Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 183, Issue 1–4, pp 381–394 | Cite as

Soil tillage erosion estimated by using magnetism of soils—a case study from Bulgaria

  • Diana Jordanova
  • Neli Jordanova
  • Anna Atanasova
  • Tsenka Tsacheva
  • Petar Petrov


A detailed field and laboratory study on small 0.84-ha test site of agricultural land near Sofia (Bulgaria) has been carried out in order to test the applicability of magnetic methods in soil erosion estimation in the particular case of strongly magnetic parent material. Field measurements of magnetic susceptibility were carried out with grid size of 6 m, resulting in 258 data points. Bulk soil material was gathered from 78 grid points. Natural, non-disturbed soil section was sampled near the agricultural field for reference profile of complete undisturbed soil. Surface susceptibility measurements reveal well-defined maxima down slope which, however, cannot be assigned directly to a certain depth interval, corresponding with susceptibilities along the non-disturbed soil profile. This is caused by the high magnetic susceptibility of the lithogenic coarse-grained magnetic fraction. Non-uniqueness is resolved by using magnetic susceptibility of coarse (1 mm > d > 63 μm) and fine (d < 63 μm) mechanical fractions and the parameter Δχ = 100*(χcoarse − χfine)/χbulk (%). It shows increased values in the C-horizon of undisturbed soil profile, which corresponds to a certain part of the studied area. After the application of an empirical model to predict the values of magnetic parameter after tillage homogenization and removal of soil material from the surface, the amount of soil loss is estimated.


Tillage erosion Magnetism Vertisol Bulgaria 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bogdanov, B. (1982). Bulgaria. In F. W. Dunning, W. Mykura, D. Slater (Eds.), Mineral deposits of Europe, (Vol. 2, pp. 215–232). London: Mineralogy Society and Inst. Of Mineralogy and Metallurgy.Google Scholar
  2. Borselli, L., & Torri, D. (2001). Measurement of soil translocation by tillage using a non-invasive electromagnetic method. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 56(2), 106–111.Google Scholar
  3. De Alba, S. (2001). Modelling the effects of complex topography and patterns of tillage on soil translocation by tillage with mouldboard plough. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 56(4), 335–345.Google Scholar
  4. De Alba, S., Borselli, L., Torri, D., Pellegrini, S., & Bazzoffi, P. (2006). Assessment of tillage erosion by mouldboard plough in Tuscani (Italy). Soil & Tillage Research, 85, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dearing, J. A., Morton, R. I., Price, T. W., & Foster, I. D. L. (1986). Tracing movements of topsoil by magnetic measurements: Two case studies. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 42, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dearing, J., Hay, K., Baban, S., Huddleston, A., Wellington, E., & Loveland, P. (1996). Magnetic susceptibility of topsoils: A test of conflicting theories using a national database. Geophysical Journal International, 127, 728–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Jong, E., Nestor, P. A., & Pennock, D. J. (1998). The use of magnetic susceptibility to measure long-term soil redistribution. Catena, 32, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunlop, D., & Ozdemir, O. (1997). Rock magnetism. Fundamentals and frontiers. In D. Edwards (Ed.), Cambridge studies in magnetism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Govers, G., Vandaele, R., Desmet, P. J. J., Poesen, J., & Bunte, K. (1994). The role of tillage in soil redistribution on hillslopes. European Journal of Soil Science, 45, 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Govers, G., Lobb, D., & Quine, T. A. (1999). Tillage erosion and translocation: emergence of a new paradigm in soil erosion research. Soil & Tillage Research, 51, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grimley, D., & Arruda, N. (2007). Observations of magnetite dissolution in poorly drained soils. Soil Science, 172(12), 968–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanesch, M., & Scholger, R. (2005). The influence of soil type on the magnetic susceptibility measured through soil profiles. Geophysical Journal International, 161(1), 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heckrath, G., Halekoh, U., Djurhuus, J., & Govers, G. (2006). The effect of tillage direction on soil redistribution by mouldboard ploughing on complex slopes. Soil & Tillage Research, 88, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenny, H. (1941). Factors of soil formation. In R. Amundson (Ed.), A system of quantitative pedology 1994 edn. New York: Dover Publ. Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Koinov, V., Kabakchiev, I., & Boneva, K. (1998). Atlas of soils in Bulgaria. In V. Koinov, & K. Boneva (Eds.). Zemizdat, Sofia.Google Scholar
  16. Landgraf, C. E., & Royall, D. (2006). Spatial patterns of surface soil magnetism and soil redistribution across a fallow field, Northern Alabama. Southeastern Geographer, 46(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mabit, L., Benmansour, M., & Walling, D. E. (2008). Comparative advantages and limitations of the fallout radionuclides 137Cs, 210Pbex and 7Be for assessing soil erosion and sedimentation—a review. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 99, 1799–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maher, B. (1986). Characterization of soils by mineral magnetic measurements. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 42, 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maher, B. (1998). Magnetic properties of modern soils and Quaternary loessic paleosols: paleoclimatic implications. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 137, 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maher, B., & Taylor, R. (1988). Formation of ultrafine-grained magnetite in soils. Nature, 336, 368–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mullins, C., & Tite, M. (1973). Magnetic viscosity, quadrature susceptibility and frequency dependence of susceptibility in single domain assemblies of magnetite and maghemite. Journal of Geophysical Research, 78, 804–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Poesen, J., van Wesemael, B., Govers, G., Martinez-Hernandez, J., Desmet, P. J. J., Vandaele, K., et al. (1997). Patterns of rock fragment cover generated by tillage erosion. Geomorphology, 18, 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Renard, K. G., Laflen, J. M., Foster, G. R., & McCool, D. K. (1994). RUSLE revisited: status questions, answers and the future. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 49, 213–220.Google Scholar
  24. Rousseva, S., Tcvetkova, E., & Lozanova, L. (2009). Soil erosion rates at field plot studies in Bulgaria. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72(12), A1124. Suppl.1.Google Scholar
  25. Royall, D. (2001). Use of mineral magnetic measurements to investigate soil erosion and sediment delivery in a small agricultural catchment in limestone terrain. Catena, 46, 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Royall, D. (2004). Particle-size and analytical considerations in the mineral–magnetic interpretation of soil loss from cultivated landscapes. Catena, 57, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Royall, D. (2007). A comparison of mineral-magnetic and distributed RUSLE modeling in the assessment of soil loss on a southeastern U.S. cropland. Catena, 69, 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thompson, R., & Oldfield, F. (1986). Environmental magnetism. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  29. Walling, D. E., & He, Q. (1999). Improved models for estimating soil erosion rates from Cs-137 measurements. Journal of Environmental Quality, 28(2), 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang, H., Huo, Y., Zeng, L., Wu, X., & Cai, Y. (2008). A 42-yr soil erosion record inferred from mineral magnetism of reservoir sediments in a small carbonate-rock catchment, Guizhou Plateau, southwest China. Journal of Paleolimnology, 40(3), 897–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang, J. H., Su, Z. A., & Nie, X. J. (2009). An investigation of soil translocation and erosion by conservation hoeing tillage on steep lands using a magnetic tracer. Soil & Tillage Research, 105, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Jordanova
    • 1
    • 2
  • Neli Jordanova
    • 2
  • Anna Atanasova
    • 2
  • Tsenka Tsacheva
    • 3
  • Petar Petrov
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsSofia University “St. Kl. Ohridski”SofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and GeographyBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  3. 3.Institute of Physical ChemistryBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations