Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 176, Issue 1–4, pp 561–574 | Cite as

How safe are the global water coverage figures? Case study from Madhya Pradesh, India

  • Sam Godfrey
  • Pawan Labhasetwar
  • Satish Wate
  • Sarika Pimpalkar
Article

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO)/United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply and Sanitation was designed to provide reference figures for access in individual countries to safe water. The JMP is based on non-administrative or nongovernment data from national-level surveys such as the Multiple Indicator Clusters Survey (MICS) or Demographic Health Survey. In the 2007 JMP report, India is noted to have water supply coverage of 89% (95% in urban areas and 85% in rural areas) compared to the Government of India estimates of 95%. The central state of Madhya Pradesh is noted by the Government of India to have coverage of 60%. However, the definition of access to safe water currently does not consider the quality or safety of the water being consumed. This paper, therefore, presents results from the application of a statistical tool (random multiple cluster technique—termed Rapid Assessment of Drinking Water Quality [RADWQ]) to Indore Zone in Madhya Pradesh. When results provided by the RADWQ technique are compared to the JMP MICS data, coverage levels reported in the JMP are reduced by up to 40% due to the high risk of microbiological (thermotolerant coliforms) contamination. In Indore Zone, the coverage of safe water reduced from 42% to 25% through the inclusion of the water safety parameters. The study recommends the inclusion of water quality/safety data in reported data under the UNICEF/WHO JMP.

Keywords

Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) Rapid Assessment of Drinking Water Quality (RADWQ) Multidistrict Assessment of Water Safety (MDWAS) Sanitary risks Water safety 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartram, J., & Balance, R. (1996). Water quality monitoring: A practical guide to the design and implementation of freshwater quality studies and monitoring programmes. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Baumgart, H., & Sperling, F. (1984). Monitoring stations and water quality measurements on the river Lippe: Equipment-results-costs. Water Science and Technology, 16, 327–346.Google Scholar
  3. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (1991). Drinking water quality standards.Google Scholar
  4. Canter, L. (1985). River water quality monitoring. Chelsea: Lewis.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, Y. X., Lin, M. Q., He, Z. L., Xiao, Y. D., Chen, C., Min, D., et al. (1996). Relationship between total fluoride intake and dental fluorosis in areas polluted by airborne fluoride. Fluoride, 29(1), 7–12.Google Scholar
  6. Dissanayake, C. B., & Rohana, C. (1999). Medical geochemistry of tropical environments. Earth-Science Reviews, 47, 219–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Government of India (CENSUS) (2001). National census data. New Delhi, India: Government of India.Google Scholar
  8. Herricks, E. (1982). Biological monitoring: Receiving system methodology based on community structure. Water Research, 16, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Howard, G., Ince, M., & Smith, M. (2003). Rapid assessment of drinking water quality: A handbook for implementation. Unpublished draft, WHO/UNICEF/WEDC, WEDC, Loughborough University, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Kahama, R. W., Karuiki, D. N., & Njenga, L. W. (1997). Fluorosis in children and sources of fluoride around lake Elimentaite region of Kenya. Fluoride, 30(1), 19–25Google Scholar
  11. Ortiz, D., Castro, L., Turrubiartes, F., Milan, J., & Diaz Barriga, F. (1998). Assessment of exposure to fluoride from drink water in Durango, Mexico, using a geographic information system. Fluoride, 31(4), 183–187.Google Scholar
  12. Planning Commission, Government of India (2007). Eleventh five-year plan (2007–2012), rural drinking water and sanitation.Google Scholar
  13. Sanders, T. G. (1980). Water quality as a stochastic process. In Proceedings of the ASCE national convention, 14–18 April. Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  14. Sanders, T., Ward, R., Loftis, R., Steele, T., Adrian, D., & Yevjevich, V. (1983). Design of networks for monitoring water quality. Highlands Ranch: Water Resources Publications LLC.Google Scholar
  15. US Geological Survey (1977). Elements needed in design of a ground-water-quality monitoring network in the Hawaiian Islands. Water-Supply Paper 2041.Google Scholar
  16. WaterAid India (2005). Water and sanitation in Madhya Pradesh: A profile of the state, institutions and policy environment. India: WaterAid Publication.Google Scholar
  17. WaterAid India (2006). Water and sanitation in rural areas of Madhya Pradesh. India: WaterAid Publication.Google Scholar
  18. Whitfield, P.H. (1988). Goals and data collection design for water quality monitoring. Water Resources Bulletin, 24(4), 775–780.Google Scholar
  19. WHO (2004). Guidelines for drinking water quality: Recommendations (Vol. 1, 3rd Ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/gdwq3rev/en/index.html.
  20. WHO (2005). Water-related diseases, fluorosis; the disease and how it affects people. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  21. WHO/UNICEF (2008). Joint monitoring programme for water supply and sanitation (JMP), progress on drinking water and sanitation: Special focus on sanitation. New York: WHO/UNICEF.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sam Godfrey
    • 1
  • Pawan Labhasetwar
    • 2
  • Satish Wate
    • 2
  • Sarika Pimpalkar
    • 2
  1. 1.UNICEFMaputoMozambique
  2. 2.Geo-environment Management Division (GEM)National Environmental Engineering and Research Institute (NEERI)NagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations