Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 171, Issue 1–4, pp 111–128 | Cite as

Soil chemical and physical properties at the Bear Brook Watershed in Maine, USA

  • Michael D. SanClements
  • Ivan J. Fernandez
  • Stephen A. Norton
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Acidic deposition leads to the acidification of waters and accelerated leaching and depletion of soil base cations. The Bear Brook Watershed in Maine has used whole-watershed chemical manipulations to study the effects of elevated N and S on forest ecosystem function on a decadal time scale. The objectives of this study were to define the chemical and physical characteristics of soils in both the reference and treated watersheds after 17 years of treatment and assess evidence of change in soil chemistry by comparing soil studies in 1998 and 2006. Results from 1998 confirmed depletion of soil base cation pools and decreased pH due to elevated N and S within the treated watershed. However, between 1998 and 2006, during a period of declining SO\(_{4}^{\,\,2-}\) deposition and continued whole-watershed experimental acidification on the treated watershed, there was little evidence of continued soil exchangeable base cation concentration depletion or recovery. The addition of a pulse of litterfall and accelerating mineralization from a severe ice storm in 1998 may have had significant effects on forest floor nutrient pools and cycling between 1998 and 2006. Our findings suggest that mineralization of additional litter inputs from the ice storm may have obscured temporal trends in soil chemistry. The physical data presented also demonstrate the importance of coarse fragments in the architecture of these soils. This study underscores the importance of long-term, quantitative soil monitoring in determining the trajectories of change in forest soils and ecosystem processes over time.

Keywords

Soil chemistry Acidification Nitrogen Sulfur Calcium Forest 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aber, J. D., McDowell, W., Nadelhoffer, K., Magill, A., Bernston, G., Kamakea, M., et al. (1998). Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems. Hypothesis revisited. Bioscience, 48, 921–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, M. B., Burger, J. A., Jenkins, A. B., & Zelazny, L. (2000). Impact of harvesting and atmospheric pollution on nutrient depletion of eastern US hardwood forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 138, 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg, B., & Ekbohm, G. (1983). Nitrogen immobilization in decomposing needle litter at variable carbon:nitrogen ratios. Ecology, 64, 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman, W. D., Cleveland, C. C., Halada, L., Hreško, J., & Baron, J. S. (2008). Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity. Nature Geoscience, 1, 767–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (1999). Elements of the nature and properties of soils. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Cronan, C. S., & Schofield, C. L. (1979). Aluminum leaching response to acid precipitation: Effects on high elevation watersheds in the northeast. Science, 204, 304–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delaney, M. T., Fernandez, I. J., & Simmons, J. A. (1996). Red maple and white pine litter quality: Initial changes with decomposition. Maine Agricultural Forest Experiment Station. Technical Bulletin 162. Orono: University of Maine.Google Scholar
  8. Driscoll, C. T. (1985). Aluminum in acidic surface waters: Chemistry, transport, and effects. Environmental Health Perspectives, 63, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Driscoll, C. T., Lawrence, G. B., Bulger, A. J., Butler, T. J., Cronan, C. S., Eager, C., et al. (2001). Acidic deposition in the northeastern United States: Sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies. BioScience, 51, 180–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Driscoll, C. T., Driscoll, K. M., Mitchell, M. J., & Raynal, D. J. (2003a). Effects of acidic deposition on forest and aquatic ecosystems in New York state. Environmental Pollution, 123, 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driscoll, C. T., Driscoll, K. M., Roy, K. M., & Mitchell, M. J. (2003b). Chemical response of lakes in the Adirondack region of New York to declines in acidic deposition. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 2036–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards, J. P., Kochenderfer, N. J., Coble, W. D., & Adams, M. B. (2002). Soil leachate response during 10 years of induced whole-watershed acidification. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 140, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elvir, J. A., Rustad, L., Weirsma, G. B., Fernandez, I., White, A. S., & White, G. J. (2005). Eleven-year response of foliar chemistry to chronic nitrogen and sulfur deposition additions at The Bear Brook Watershed in Maine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35, 1402–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez, I. J. (2008). Carbon and nutrients in Maine forest soils. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station. Technical Bulletin 162. Orono: University of Maine.Google Scholar
  15. Fernandez, I. J., Rustad, L. E., & Lawrence, G. B. (1993). Estimating total soil mass, nutrient content, and trace metals in soils under a low elevation spruce–fir forest. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 73, 317–328.Google Scholar
  16. Fernandez, I. J., Rustad, L. E., Norton, S. A., Kahl, J. S., & Cosby, B. J. (2003). Experimental acidification causes soil base-cation depletion at The Bear Brook Watershed in Maine. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67, 1909–1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandez, I. J., Karem, J. E., Norton, S. A., & Rustad, L. E. (2007). Temperature, soil moisture, and streamflow at The Bear Brook Watershed in Maine (BBWM). Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station. Technical Bulletin 196.Google Scholar
  18. Gundersen, P., Emmett, B. A., Kjonaas, O. J., Koopmans, C. J., & Tietema, A. (1998). Impact of nitrogen deposition on nitrogen cycling in forests: A synthesis of NITREX data. Forest Ecology and Management, 101, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamburg, S. R. (1984). Effects of forest growth on soil nitrogen and organic matter pools following release from subsistence agriculture. In E. L. Stone (Ed.),Forest soils and treatment impacts. Proceedings of the sixth North American forest soils conference (pp. 145–158). Knoxville, TN: Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee.Google Scholar
  20. Haines, B. L. & Carlson, B. L. (1989). Effects of acidic precipitation on trees. In D. C. Adriano, & A. H. Johnson (Eds.), Acidic precipitation: Biological and ecological effects (Vol. 2). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Hendershot, W. H., Lalande, L., & Duquette, M. (1993). Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity (pp. 1–28). Boca Raton: Lewis.Google Scholar
  22. Hooper, M. C., Arii, K., & Lechowicz, M. (2001). Impact of major ice storm on an old growth hardwood forest. Canadian Journal of Botany, 79, 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huntington, T. G., Hooper, R. P., Johnson, C. E., Aulenbach, B. T., Cappellato, R., & Blum, A. E. (2000). Calcium depletion in a southeastern United States forest. Soil Science of America Journal, 64, 1845–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jefts, S., Fernandez, I. J., Rustad, L. E., & Dail, D. B. (2004). Decadal responses in soil N dynamics at The Bear Brook Watershed in Maine, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 189, 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, C. E. (2002). Cation exchange properties of acid forest soils of the northeastern USA. European Journal of Soil Science, 53, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kopáček, J., Hejzlar, J., Kaňa, J., Norton, S. A., Porcal, P., & Turek, J. (2009). Trends in aluminium export from a mountainous area to surface waters, from deglaciation to the recent: effects of vegetation and soil development, atmospheric acidification, and nitrogen-saturation. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 103, 1439–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehmann, C. M. B., Bowersox, V. C., Larson, R. S., & Larson, S. M. (2007). Monitoring long-term trends in sulfate and ammonium in US precipitation: Results from the National Atmospheric Deposition Program National Trends Network. Water Air Soil Pollution: Focus, 7, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Likens, G. E., Driscoll, C. T., & Busco, D. C. (1996). Long-term effects of acid rain: response and recovery of a forest ecosystem. Science, 272, 244–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martinson, L., Lamersdorf, N., & Warfvinge, P. (2005). The Solling roof revisited—slow recovery from acidification observed and modeled despite a decade of “clean rain” treatment. Environmental Pollution, 135, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller-Weeks, M., & Eager, C. (1999). The northeastern 1998 ice storm: A forest damage assessment for New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine. Durham: Northeastern Research Station.Google Scholar
  31. Mohamed, H. K., Pathak, S., Roy, D. N., Hutchison, T. C., Mclaughlin, D. L., & Kinch, J. C. (1997). Relationships between sugar maple decline and corresponding chemical changes in the stem tissue. Water Air Soil Pollution, 96, 321–327.Google Scholar
  32. Norton, S., Kahl, J., Fernandez, I., Haines, T., Rustad, L., Nodvin, S., et al. (1999). The Bear Brook Watershed, Maine (BBWM), USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 55, 7–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norton, S. A., Fernandez, I. J., Kahl, J. S., & Reinhardt, R. L. (2004). Acidification trends and the evolution of neutralization mechanisms through time at The Bear Brook Watershed in Maine, U.S.A. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 4, 289–310.Google Scholar
  34. Rhoads, A. G., Hamburg, S. P., Fahey, T. J., Siccama, T. G., Hane, E. N., Battles, J., et al. (2002). Effects of an intense ice storm on the structure of a northern hardwood forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Resources, 32, 1763–1775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rourke, R. V. (1990). Chemical and physical properties of the Aurelie, Burnham, Easton, Lille, Linneus, Monadnock, Nicholville, and Tunbridge Soil Map Units. Maine Agricultural and Experiment Station. Technical Bulletin 137. Orono: University of Maine.Google Scholar
  36. Rosselad, B. O., & Staurnes, M. (1994). Physiological mechanisms for toxic effects and resistance to acidic water: An ecophysiological and ecotoxicological approach. In C. E. W. Steinberg, & R. F. Wright (Eds.), Acidification of freshwater ecosystem: Implications for the future (pp. 227–246). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Rustad, L. E. (1994). Element dynamics along a decay continuum in a red spruce ecosystem in Maine, USA. Ecology, 75, 867–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SanClements, M. D. (2009). The chemistry of acidic soils in humid, temperate, forested watersheds with emphasis on phosphates, aluminum, and iron. Orono: University of Maine.Google Scholar
  39. Schaberg, P. G., Tilley, J. W., Hawley, G. J., DeHayes, D. H., & Bailey, S. W. (2006). Associations of calcium and aluminum with the growth and health of sugar maple trees in Vermont. Forest Ecology and Management, 223, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sherman, J., Fernandez, I. J., Norton, S. A., Ohno, T., & Rustad, L. E. (2006). Soil aluminum, iron, and phosphorus dynamics in response to long-term experimental nitrogen and sulfur additions at the Bear Brook Watershed in Maine, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 121, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stern, D. I. (2005). Global sulfur emissions from 1850 to 2000. Chemosphere, 58, 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stoddard, J. L., Kahl, J. S., Deviney, F. A., DeWalle, D. R., Driscoll, C. T., Herlihy, A. T., et al. (2003). The response of surface water chemistry to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. EPA 620/R-03/001 (74 pp.). Research Triangle Park: United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  43. Wang, Z., & Fernandez, I. (1999). Soil type and forest vegetation influences on forest floor nitrogen dynamics at The Bear Brook Watershed in Maine (BBWM). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 55, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Warby, R. A. F., Johnson, C. E., & Driscoll, C. T. (2005). Chemical recovery of surface waters across the Northeastern United States from reduced inputs of acidic deposition: 1984–2001. Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 6548–6554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Warby, R. A. F., Johnson, C. E., & Driscoll, C. T. (2009). Continuing acidification of organic soils across the northeastern USA: 1984–2001. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watmough, S. A., Aherne, J., Alewell, C., Arp, P., Bailey, S., Clair, T., et al. (2005). Sulphate, nitrogen and base cation budgets at 21 forested catchments in Canada, the United States and Europe. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 109, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. White, G., Fernandez, I., & Weirsma, G. (1999). Impacts of ammonium sulfate treatment on the foliar chemistry of forest trees at The Bear Brook Watershed in Maine. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 55, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wood, T., Bormann, F. H., & Voigt, G. K. (1984). Phosphorus cycling in a northern hardwood forest: Biological and chemical control. Science, 223, 391–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yanai, R. D. (1992). Phosphorus budget of a 70-year-old northern hardwood forest. Biogeochemistry, 17, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yanai, R. D. (1998). The effect of whole-tree harvest on phosphorus cycling in a northern hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 104, 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. SanClements
    • 1
  • Ivan J. Fernandez
    • 2
  • Stephen A. Norton
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Arctic and Alpine ResearchUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant, Soil, and Environmental SciencesUniversity of MaineOronoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations