Mercury trends in fish from rivers and lakes in the United States, 1969–2005
- 877 Downloads
A national dataset on concentrations of mercury in fish, compiled mainly from state and federal monitoring programs, was used to evaluate trends in mercury (Hg) in fish from US rivers and lakes. Trends were analyzed on data aggregated by site and by state, using samples of the same fish species and tissue type, and using fish of similar lengths. Site-based trends were evaluated from 1969 to 2005, but focused on a subset of the data from 1969 to 1987. Data aggregated by state were used to evaluate trends in fish Hg concentrations from 1988 to 2005. In addition, the most recent Hg fish data (1996–2005) were compared to wet Hg deposition data from the Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) over the same period. Downward trends in Hg concentrations in fish from data collected during 1969–1987 exceeded upward trends by a ratio of 6 to 1. Declining Hg accumulation rates in sediment and peat cores reported by many studies during the 1970s and 1980s correspond with the period when the most downward trends in fish Hg concentrations occurred. Downward Hg trends in both sediment cores and fish were also consistent with the implementation of stricter regulatory controls of direct releases of Hg to the atmosphere and surface waters during the same period. The southeastern USA had more upward Hg trends in fish than other regions for both site and state aggregated data. Upward Hg trends in fish from the southeastern USA were associated with increases in wet deposition in the region and may be attributed to a greater influence of global atmospheric Hg emissions in the southeastern USA. No significant trends were found in 62% of the fish species from six states from 1996 to 2005. A lack of Hg trends in fish in the more recent data was consistent with the lack of trends in wet Hg deposition at MDN sites and with relatively constant global emissions during the same time period. Although few significant trends were observed in the more recent Hg concentrations in fish, it is anticipated that Hg concentrations in fish will respond to changes in atmospheric Hg deposition, however, the magnitude and timing of the response is uncertain.
KeywordsMercury Fish Trends Wet deposition Atmospheric emissions
- Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
- Atkeson, T., Axelrad, D., Pollman, C., & Keeler, G. (2003). Integrating atmospheric mercury deposition and aquatic cycling in the Florida Everglades: An approach for conducting a total maximum daily load analysis for an atmospherically derived pollutant. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Environmental Protection. http://www.floridadep.org/labs/mercury/index.htm. Accessed 15 March 2009.Google Scholar
- Harris, R. C., Rudd, J. W. M., Amyot, M., Babiarz, C. L., Beaty, K. G., Blanchfield, P. J., et al. (2007). Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0704186104. Accessed 23 March 2009.
- Helsel, D. R., & Hirsch, R. M. (1992). Statistical methods in water resources. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Hinck, J. E., Bartish, T. M., Blazer, V. S., Denslow, N. D., Gross, T. S., & Myers, M. S. (2004). Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) program: Environmental contaminants and their effects on fish in the Yukon River Basin. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5285. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/usgspubs/sir/sir20045285. Accessed 15 March 2009.
- Hinck, J. E., Schmitt, C. J., Blazer, V. S., Denslow, N. D., Bartish, T. M., Anderson, P. J., et al. (2006a). Environmental contaminants and biomarker responses in fish from the Columbia River and its tributaries: Spatial and temporal trends. Science of the Total Environment, 366, 549–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hinck, J. E., Blazer, V. S., Denslow, N. D., Gross, T. S., Echols, K. R., Davis, A. P., et al. (2006b). Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) program: Environmental contaminants, health indicators, and reproductive biomarkers in fish from the Colorado River basin. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5163. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5163/pdf/SIR06-5163.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2009.
- Hinck, J. E., Blazer, V. S., Denslow, N. D., Echols, K. R., Gale, R. W., May, T. W., et al. (2007). Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) Program: Environmental contaminants, health indicators, and reproductive biomarkers in fish from the Mobile, Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint, Savannah, and Pee Dee River basins. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007- 5176. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2007/5176/. Accessed 15 March 2009.
- Hintelmann, H., Harris, R., Heyes, A., Hurley, J. P., Kelly, C. A., Krabbenhoft, D. P., et al. (2002). Reactivity and mobility of new and old mercury deposition in a boreal forest ecosystem during the first year of the METAALICUS study. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 5034–5040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krabbenhoft, D. P., Branfireum, B. A., & Heyes, A. (2005). Biogeochemical cycles affecting the speciation, fate, and transport of mercury in the environment. In M. B. Parsens & J. B. Perival (Eds.), Mercury: Sources, measurements, cycles, and effects, short course series (Vol. 34, pp. 139–156). Ottawa: Mineralogical Association of Canada.Google Scholar
- Krabbenhoft, D. P., Engstrom, D., Gilmour, C., Harris, R., Hurley, J., & Mason, R. (2007). Monitoring and evaluating trends in sediment and water indicators. In R. Harris, D. Krabbenhoft, R. Mason, M. W. Murray, R. Reash, & T. Saltman (Eds.), Ecosystem responses to mercury contamination: Indicators of change (pp. 47–87). New York: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) North America Workshop on Mercury Monitoring and Assessment, CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lamborg, C. H., Fitzgerald, W. F., Damman, A. W. H., Benoit, J. M., Balcom, P. H., & Engstrom, D. R. (2002). Modern and historical atmospheric mercury fluxes in both hemispheres: Global and regional mercury cycling implications. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16(4), 1104. doi:10.1029/2001GB001847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- May, T. W., & McKinney, G. L. (1981). Cadmium, lead, mercury, arsenic, and selenium concentrations in freshwater fish, 1976–77—National Pesticide Monitoring Program. Pesticides Monitoring Journal, 15(1), 14–38.Google Scholar
- SAS Institute, Inc (2002). SAS/STAT user’s guide (version 8.02). Cary: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, C. J. (2002). Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) program: Environmental contaminants and their effects on fish in the Mississippi River basin. U.S. Geological Survey Biological Science Report USGS/BRD/BSR 2002–0004. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/usgspubs/bsr/bsr020004. Accessed 15 March 2009.
- Schmitt, C. J., Zajicek, J. L., May, T. W., & Cowman, D. F. (1999). Organochlorine residues and elemental contaminants in U.S. freshwater fish, 1976–1986: National Contaminant Biomonitoring Program. Reviews of Environmental Toxicology, 162, 43–104.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, C. J., Hinck, J. E., Blazer, V. S., Denslow, N. D., Dethloff, G. M., Bartish, T. M., et al. (2005). Environmental contaminants and biomarker responses in fish from the Rio Grande and its U.S. tributaries: Spatial and temporal trends. Science of the Total Environment, 350, 161–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schuster, P. F., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Naftz, D. L., Cecil, L. D., Olson, M. L., DeWild, J. F., et al. (2002). Atmospheric mercury deposition during the last 270 years: A glacial ice core record of natural and anthropogenic sources. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 2303–2310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2007). EPA Fact Sheet: 2005/2006 National listing of fish advisories. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA, EPA-823-F-07-003. http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/fish/advisories/2006/tech.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2009.
- USEPA (1997). Mercury Study Report to Congress. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C, USA, USEPA 452R-97-004.Google Scholar
- USEPA (2004). http://www.epa.gov/mercury/control_emissions/emissions.htm. Accessed 23 March 2009.
- USEPA (2006). National Hydrography Dataset Plus. http://www.epa.gov/waters. Accessed 23 March 2009.
- U. S. Geological Survey (2000). National Land Cover Data (NLCD) circa 1992, completed nationwide September 2000. http://seamless.usgs.gov/. Accessed 23 March 2009.
- Van Metre, P. C., Wilson, J. T., Fuller, C. C., Callender, E., & Mahler, B. J. (2004). Methods, site characteristics, and age dating of sediment cores for 56 U.S. lakes and reservoirs sampled by the USGS National Water-Quality Assessment program, 1993–2001. U.S. Geological Survey SIR 2004-5184.Google Scholar
- Wiener, J. G., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Heinz, G. H., & Scheuhammer, A. M. (2003). Ecotoxicology of mercury. In D. J. Hoffman, B. A. Rattner, G. A. Burton Jr., & J. Cairns Jr. (Eds.), Handbook of ecotoxicology (2nd ed., pp. 409–463). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Wiener, J. G., Knights, B. C., Sandheinrich, M. B., Jeremiason, J. D., Brigham, M. E., Engstrom, D. R., et al. (2006). Mercury in soils, lakes, and fish in Voyageurs National Park (Minnesota): Importance of atmospheric deposition and ecosystem factors. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 6261–6268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wiener, J. G., Bodaly, R. A., Brown, S. S., Lucotte, M., Newman, M. C., Porcella, D. B., et al. (2007). Monitoring and evaluating trends in methylmercury accumulation in aquatic biota. In R. Harris, D. P. Krabbenhoft, R. Mason, M. W. Murray, R. Reash, & T. Saltman (Eds.), Ecosystem responses to mercury contamination: Indicators of change (pp. 47–87). New York: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) North America Workshop on Mercury Monitoring and Assessment, CRC.Google Scholar