Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 171, Issue 1–4, pp 289–308

Evaluation of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural use in Thanjavur city, Tamil Nadu, India

  • R. Nagarajan
  • N. Rajmohan
  • U. Mahendran
  • S. Senthamilkumar


As groundwater is a vital source of water for domestic and agricultural activities in Thanjavur city due to lack of surface water resources, groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural usage were evaluated. In this study, 102 groundwater samples were collected from dug wells and bore wells during March 2008 and analyzed for pH, electrical conductivity, temperature, major ions, and nitrate. Results suggest that, in 90% of groundwater samples, sodium and chloride are predominant cation and anion, respectively, and NaCl and CaMgCl are major water types in the study area. The groundwater quality in the study site is impaired by surface contamination sources, mineral dissolution, ion exchange, and evaporation. Nitrate, chloride, and sulfate concentrations strongly express the impact of surface contamination sources such as agricultural and domestic activities, on groundwater quality, and 13% of samples have elevated nitrate content (>45 mg/l as NO3). PHREEQC code and Gibbs plots were employed to evaluate the contribution of mineral dissolution and suggest that mineral dissolution, especially carbonate minerals, regulates water chemistry. Groundwater suitability for drinking usage was evaluated by the World Health Organization and Indian standards and suggests that 34% of samples are not suitable for drinking. Integrated groundwater suitability map for drinking purposes was created using drinking water standards based on a concept that if the groundwater sample exceeds any one of the standards, it is not suitable for drinking. This map illustrates that wells in zones 1, 2, 3, and 4 are not fit for drinking purpose. Likewise, irrigational suitability of groundwater in the study region was evaluated, and results suggest that 20% samples are not fit for irrigation. Groundwater suitability map for irrigation was also produced based on salinity and sodium hazards and denotes that wells mostly situated in zones 2 and 3 are not suitable for irrigation. Both integrated suitability maps for drinking and irrigation usage provide overall scenario about the groundwater quality in the study area. Finally, the study concluded that groundwater quality is impaired by man-made activities, and proper management plan is necessary to protect valuable groundwater resources in Thanjavur city.


Groundwater quality Suitability maps Contamination Thanjavur city South India 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, S., Titus, R., Pietersen, K., Tredoux, G., & Harris, C. (2001). Hydrochemical characteristics of aquifers near Sutherland in the Western Karoo, South Africa. Journal of Hydrology, 241, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Bassam, A. M., & Al-Rumikhani, Y. A. (2003). Integrated hydrochemical method of water quality assessment for irrigation in arid areas: Application to the Jilh aquifer, Saudi Arabia. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 36, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Futaisi, A., Rajmohan, N., & Al-Touqi, S. (2007). Groundwater quality monitoring in and around Barka dumping site, Sultanate of Oman. The Second IASTED (The International Association of Science and Technology for Development) International Conference on Water Resources Management (WRM 2007). August 20–22, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Alison, E. C., Janet, S. H., & Blair, F. J. (1992). The chemical influence of clay minerals on groundwater composition in a lithologically heterogeneous carbonate aquifer. In Y. K. Kharaka, & A. S. Maest (Eds.), Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Water–Rock Interaction (WRI7, Vol. 2) (pp. 779–782). Utah: Balkema.Google Scholar
  5. APHA (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (19th edn). Washington: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  6. Ator, S. W., & Denis, J. M. (1997). Relation of nitrogen and phosphorus in ground water to land use in four subunits of the Potomac River Basin. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report, 97–4268. Reston: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  7. Bhatt, K. B., & Saklani, S. (1996). Hydrogeochemistry of the Upper Ganges River, India. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 48, 171–182.Google Scholar
  8. Blake, R. (1989). The origin of high sodium bicarbonate waters in the Otway Basin, Victoria, Australia. In D. L. Miles (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Water–Rock Interaction (WRI-6) (pp. 83–85). England: Malvern.Google Scholar
  9. Canter, L. W. (1997). Nitrates in groundwater. Boca Raton: CRC/Lewis.Google Scholar
  10. Census of India. (2001). Data from the 2001 Census, including cities, villages and towns (Provisional). Census Commission of India.Google Scholar
  11. Cerling, T. E., Pederson, B. L., & Damm, K. L. V. (1989). Sodium calcium ion exchange in the weathering of shales: Implications for global weathering budgets. Geology, 17, 552–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, I., & Fritz, P. (1997). Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. New York: Lewis.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, S. N., & DeWiest, R. J. M. (1966). Hydrogeology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Eaton, E. M. (1950). Significance in carbonate in irrigation water. Soil Science, 69, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elampooranan, T., Rajmohan, N., & Abirami, L. (1999). Hydrochemical studies of Artesian well waters in Cauvery deltaic area, South India. Indian Journal of Environmental Health, 41(2), 107–114.Google Scholar
  16. Elango, L., Rajmohan, N., & Gnanasundar, D. (1998). Groundwater quality monitoring in intensively cultivated regions of Tamil Nadu, India. In Proceedings of International Association of Hydrogeologists & International Groundwater Conference, February 8–13. University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  17. Elango, L., Suresh Kumar, S., & Rajmohan, N. (2003). Hydrochemical studies of groundwater in Chengalpet region, South India. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 23(6), 624–632.Google Scholar
  18. Elhatip, H., Afsin, M., Kuscu, L., Dirik, K., Kurmac, A., & Kavurmac, M. (2003). Influences of human activities and agriculture on groundwater quality of Kayseri–Incesu–Dokuzpınar springs, central Anatolian part of Turkey. Environmental Geology, 44, 490–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fetters, C. W. (1990). Applied hydrogeology. New Delhi: CBS.Google Scholar
  20. Foster, M. D. (1950). The origin of high sodium bicarbonate waters in the Atlantic and Gulf Coast plains. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeze, R. A., & Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, pp. 604.Google Scholar
  22. Gibbs, R. J. (1970). Mechanism controlling world water chemistry. Science, 170, 1088–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Indian Standard Institution. (1991). Indian standard specification for drinking water. IS, 10500, 1–5.Google Scholar
  24. Jeevanandam, M., Kannan, R., Srinivasalu, S., & Rammohan, V. (2006). Hydrogeochemistry and Groundwater Quality Assessment of Lower Part of the Ponnaiyar River Basin, Cuddalore District, South India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 132(1–3), 263–274.Google Scholar
  25. Jeong, C. H. (2001). Effect of land use and urbanization on hydrochemistry and contamination of groundwater from Taejon area, Korea. Journal of Hydrology, 253, 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalkhoff, S. J., Detroy, M. G., Cherryholmes, K. L., & Kuzniar, R. L. (1992). Herbicide and nitrate variation in alluvium underlying a cornfield at a site in Iowa County, Iowa. Water Resources Bulletin, 28(6), 1001–1011.Google Scholar
  27. Karanth, K. R. (1987). Groundwater assessment, development and management. New Delhi: Tata-McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  28. Laluraj, C. M., & Gopinath, G. (2006). Assessment on seasonal variation of groundwater quality of phreatic aquifers—A river basin system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 117, 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, S. M., Min, K. D., Woo, N. C., Kim, Y. J., & Ahn, C. H. (2003). Statistical models for the assessment of nitrate contamination in urban groundwater using GIS. Environmental Geology, 44, 210–221.Google Scholar
  30. Lloyd, J. W., & Heathcote, J. A. (1985). Natural inorganic hydrochemistry in relation to groundwater. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 294.Google Scholar
  31. Ma, J., Ding, Z., Wei, G., Zhao, H., & Huang, T. (2009). Sources of water pollution and evolution of water quality in the Wuwei basin of Shiyang River, Northwest China. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1168–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nisi, B., Buccianti, A., Vaselli, O., Perini, G., Tassi, F., Minissale, A., et al. (2008). Hydrogeochemistry and strontium isotopes in the Arno River Basin (Tuscany, Italy): Constraints on natural controls by statistical modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 360, 166–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parkhurst, D. L., & Appelo, C. A. J. (1999). User’s guide to PHREEQC (version 2)—A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. USGS Water–Resources Investigations Report, 99–4259.Google Scholar
  34. Piper, A. M. (1944). A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analyses. American Geophysical Union Transactions, 25, 83–90.Google Scholar
  35. Pritchard, M., Mkandawire, T., & O’Neill, J. G. (2008). Assessment of groundwater quality in shallow wells within the southern districts of Malawi. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, 812–823.Google Scholar
  36. Rajmohan, N., & Elango, L. (2005). Nutrient chemistry of groundwater in an intensively irrigated region of Southern India. Environmental Geology, 47, 820–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rajmohan, N., Elango, L., & Elampooranan, T. (1997). Groundwater quality in Nagai Quaid-E-Milleth District and Karaikal, South India. Indian Water Resources Society, 17(3–4), 25–30.Google Scholar
  38. Rajmohan, N., Al-Futaisi, A., & Al-Touqi, S. (2009). Geochemical process regulating groundwater quality in a coastal region with complex contamination sources: Barka, Sultanate of Oman. Environmental Earth Sciences, 59, 385–398. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0037-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramakrishna (1998). Groundwater handbook, India.Google Scholar
  40. Richards, L. A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Washington: US Dept. of Agriculture, Agri. Hand book 60.Google Scholar
  41. Sarin, M. M., Krishnaswamy, S., Dilli, K., Somayajulu, B. L. K., & Moore, W. S. (1989). Major-ion chemistry of the Ganga–Brahmaputra river system: Weathering processes and water quality assessment. Environment Geology, 48, 1014–1028.Google Scholar
  42. Schoeller, H. (1965). Qualitative evaluation of groundwater resources. In Methods and techniques of groundwater investigations and development (pp. 54–83). UNESCO.Google Scholar
  43. Schoeller, H. (1967). Geochemistry of groundwater. An international guide for research and practice (pp. 1–18). UNESCO, chap 15.Google Scholar
  44. Schot, P. P., & Van der Wal, J. (1992). Human impact on regional groundwater composition through intervention in natural flow patterns and changes in land use. Journal of Hydrology, 134, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Subba Rao, N. (2002). Geochemistry of groundwater in parts of Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Geology, 41, 552–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Subramani, T., Elango, L., & Damodarasamy, S. R. (2005). Groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural use in Chithar River Basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Environmental Geology, 47, 1099–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sujatha, D., & Rajeshwara Reddy, B. (2003). Quality characterization of groundwater in the south-eastern part of the Ranga Reddy district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Geology, 44, 579–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (2002–2004). Cauvery Delta Zone—Status paper (P88). http://www.tnau.ac.in/dr/zonepdf/CauveryDeltaZone.pdf.
  49. Trivedy, R. K., & Goel, P. K. (1984). Chemical and biological methods for water pollution studies. Karad: Environmental Publication.Google Scholar
  50. UNESCO. (2007). UNESCO water portal newsletter no. 161: Water-related diseases. http://www.unesco.org/water/news/newsletter/161.shtml.
  51. United States Salinity Laboratory. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. Washington: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  52. WHO (World Health Organization). (1993). Guidelines for drinking water quality, recommendations (2nd ed). Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  53. WHO (World Health Organization). (1997). Guideline for drinking water quality. Health criteria and other supporting information (2nd ed). Geneva: World Health organization.Google Scholar
  54. Wilcox, L. V. (1948). The quality of water for irrigation, Use US Dept. of Agriculture, Tech, Bull, 962, Washington, D. C., pp 1–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Nagarajan
    • 1
  • N. Rajmohan
    • 2
  • U. Mahendran
    • 3
  • S. Senthamilkumar
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Science and Mathematics, School of Engineering and ScienceCurtin University of TechnologyMiriMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Waste Treatment and Conditioning ResearchCommissariat a l’energie atomique (CEA), Centre De Valrho/MarcouleBagnols-Sur-CèzeFrance
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringPeriyar Maniammai UniversityThanjavurIndia

Personalised recommendations