Comparison of different semi-empirical algorithms to estimate chlorophyll-a concentration in inland lake water
- First Online:
- 204 Downloads
Based on in situ water sampling and field spectral measurement from June to September 2004 in Lake Chagan, a comparison of several existing semi-empirical algorithms to determine chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) content was made by applying them to the field spectra and in situ chlorophyll measurements. Results indicated that the first derivative of reflectance was well correlated with Chl-a. The highest correlation between the first derivative and Chl-a was at 680 nm. The two-band model, NIR/red ratio of R710/670, was also an effective predictor of Chl-a concentration. Since the two-band ratios model is a special case of the three-band model developed recently, three-band model in Lake Chagan showed a higher resolution. The new algorithm named reverse continuum removal relies on the reflectance peak at 700 nm whose shape and position depend strongly upon chlorophyll concentration: The depth and area of the peak above a baseline showed a linear relationship to Chl-a concentration. All of the algorithms mentioned proved to be of value and can be used to predict Chl-a concentration. Best results were obtained by using the algorithms of the first derivative, which yielded R2 around 0.74 and RMSE around 6.39 μg/l. The two-band and three-band algorithms were further applied to MERIS when filed spectral were resampled with regard to their center wavelengths. Both algorithms showed an adequate precision, and the differences on the outcome were small with R2 = 0.70 and 0.71.
KeywordsField spectral Lake Chagan Continuum removal Three-band model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dall’Olmo, G., & Gitelson, A. A. (2006). Effect of bio-optical parameter variability and uncertainties in reflectance measurements on the remote estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration in turbid productive waters: Modeling results. Apply Optics, 45, 3577–3592. doi:10.1364/AO.45.003577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Duan, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, B., Song, K., Wang, Z., Liu, D., et al. (2008). Estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration and trophic states for inland lakes in Northeast China from Landsat TM data and field spectral measurements. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 767–786. doi:10.1080/01431160701355249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gitelson, A., Laorawat, S., Keydan, G., & Vonshak, A. (1995). Optical properties of dense algal cultures outdoors and its application to remote estimation of biomass and pigment concentration in Spirulina platensis. Journal of Phycology, 31, 828–834. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3646.1995.00828.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gitelson, A. A., Dall’Olmo, G., Moses, W., Rundquist, D. C., Barrow, T., Fisher, T. R., et al. (2008). A simple semi-analytical model for remote estimation of chlorophyll-a in turbid waters: Validation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112, 3582–3593. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.04.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ingle, J. D., & Crouch, S. R. (1998). Spectrochemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Koponen, S., Pulliainen, J., Servomaa, H., Zhang, Y., Hallikainen, M., Kallio, K., et al. (2001). Analysis on the feasibility of multisource remote sensing observations for Chl-a monitoring in Finish lakes. The Science of the Total Environment, 268, 95–106. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00689-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mutanga, O., Skidmore, A. K., & Van Wieren, S. (2003). Discriminating tropical grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) canopies grown under different nitrogen treatments using spectroradiometry. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57, 263–272. doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00158-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, Y., Koponen, S., Pulliainen, J., & Hallikainen, M. (2002). Application of an empirical neural network to surface water quality estimation in the Gulf of Finland using combined optical data and microwave data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 81, 327–336. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00009-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar