Estimation and analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity over India by remote-sensing-driven terrestrial biosphere model
- 629 Downloads
In the present study, the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA), a terrestrial biosphere model, has been used to investigate spatiotemporal pattern of net primary productivity (NPP) during 2003 over the Indian subcontinent. The model drivers at 2-min spatial resolution were derived from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration advanced very high resolution radiometer normalized difference vegetation index, weather inputs, and soil and land cover maps. The annual NPP was estimated to be 1.57 Pg C (at the rate of 544 g C m − 2), of which 56% contributed by croplands (with 53% of geographic area of the country (GAC)), 18.5% by broadleaf deciduous forest (15% of GAC), 10% by broadleaf evergreen forest (5% of GAC), and 8% by mixed shrub and grassland (19% of GAC). There is very good agreement between the modeled NPP and ground-based cropland NPP estimates over the western India (R 2 = 0.54; p = 0.05). The comparison of CASA-based annual NPP estimates with the similar products from other operational algorithms such as C-fix and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) indicate that high agreement exists between the CASA and MODIS products over all land covers of the country, while agreement between CASA and C-Fix products is relatively low over the region dominated by agriculture and grassland, and the agreement is very low over the forest land. Sensitivity analysis suggest that the difference could be due to inclusion of variable light use efficiency (LUE) across different land cover types and environment stress scalars as downregulator of NPP in the present CASA model study. Sensitivity analysis further shows that the CASA model can overestimate the NPP by 50% of the national budget in absence of downregulators and underestimate the NPP by 27% of the national budget by the use of constant LUE (0.39 gC MJ − 1) across different vegetation cover types.
KeywordsCASA Net primary productivity Remote sensing Carbon cycle India
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Agrawal, S., Joshi, P. K., Shukla, Y., & Roy, P. S. (2003). SPOT VEGETATION multi temporal data for classifying vegetation in south central Asia. Current Science, 84(11), 1440–1448.Google Scholar
- Chaudhari, K. N., Sarkar, C., Patel, N. K., & Parihar, J. S. (2006). An inter-comparison of satellite based NOAA CPC rainfall estimates and gauge observations over selected stations in India. In Proc. of ISPRS symposium on Geospatial databases for Sustainable Development. Google Scholar
- Chhabra, A., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2004). Estimating terrestrial net primary productivity over India. Current Science, 86(2), 269-271.Google Scholar
- Datye, K. R., Joy, K. R., & Paranjape, S. (1997). Banking on biomass: A new strategy for sustainable prosperity based on renewable energy and dispersed industries (p. 319). Ahmedabad: Centre for Environment and Education.Google Scholar
- Heinsch, F. A., Zhao, M., Running, S. W., Kimball, J. S., Nemani, R. R., & Davis, K. J. (2006). Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(7), 1908–1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hooda, R. S., & Dye, R. G. (1996). Estimating carbon-fixation in India based on remote sensing data. In Proc. ACRS, GIS development. http://www.gisdevelopment.net/aars/acrs/1996/ts1/ts1003.asp.
- Hooda, R. S., Dye, D. G., & Shibaski, R. (2003). Evaluating agricultural and nonagricultural carbon fixation over India using remote sensing data. Proc. SPIE, 4879, 108.Google Scholar
- Hunt, E. R. J., Piper, S. C., Nemani, R., Keeling, C. D., Otto, R. D., & Running, S. W. (1996). Global net carbon exchange and intra-annual atmospheric CO2 concentrations predicted by an ecosystem process model and three-dimensional atmospheric transport model. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10(3), 431–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rawat, J. K., Saxena, A., & Gupta, S. (2004). Monitoring India’s forest cover through remote sensing, Conference proceeding, Map India 2004. Google Scholar
- Reynolds, C. A., Jackson, T. J., & Rawls, W. J. (1999). Estimated available water content from the FAO soil map of the world, global soil profile databases, pedo-transfer functions. Boulder: NOAA National Geophysical Data Center.Google Scholar
- Running, S. W., Thornton, P. E., Nemani, R. R., & Glassy, J. M. (2000). Global terrestrial gross and net primary productivity from the earth observing system. In O. Sala, R. Jackson, & H. Mooney (Eds.), Methods in ecosystem science (pp. 44–57). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Sabbe, H., Eerens, H., & Veroustraete, F. (1999). Estimation of the carbon balance of European terrestrial ecosystems by means of the C-Fix model. The 1999 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Data Users’ Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
- Scurlock, J. M., Asner, O. G. P., & Gower, S. T. (2001). Global leaf area index data from field measurements, 1932–2000. Data set. Available on-line [http://www.daac.ornl.gov] from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.
- Sellers, P. J., Los, S. O., Tucker, C. J., Justice, C. O., Dazlich, D. A., Collatz, G. J., et al. (1996). A revised land-surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs: Part II. The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from satellite data. Journal of Climate, 9, 706–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xie, P., Yarosh, Y., Love, T., Janowiak, J. E., & Arkin, P. A. (2002). A real-time daily precipitation analysis over South Asia. Preprints, 16th Conf. of Hydro., Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc.Google Scholar