Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 169, Issue 1–4, pp 143–157 | Cite as

The changes in different ozone metrics and their implications following precursor reductions over northern Taiwan from 1994 to 2007

  • Yu-Kai Lin
  • Ta-Hsiung Lin
  • Shuenn-Chin Chang


The changes of different O3 metrics such as O3_avg (daily mean), OX (NO2 + O3), O3_8h (daily maximum 8-h moving average), O3_max (daily maximum 1-h average), and exceedances of O3_8h and O3_max at 16 air quality monitoring stations over northern Taiwan from 1994 to 2007 are evaluated. The O3_avg at the background site displays an increasing trend at 0.54 ±0.21 ppb (1.28 ±0.49%) per year. The OX at urban sites shows a significant increase, indicating that even with the effect of reduced NO titration increasing photochemical production is evident. The exceedances of O3_8h (>80 ppb) are about 14.9% higher than O3_max (>120 ppb) with more exceedances at coastal or background sites, where the anthropogenic O3 precursor emissions are lower. In addition to increasing background O3 and reductions in NO titration, increasing O3 production efficiency also plays a key role in the increase of moderate to high O3 concentrations. The findings help explain the different trends in exceedances and levels of O3_8h and O3_max and are likewise important in the formation of O3 control strategies.


NO titration effect Background ozone Exceedance Ozone control 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chameides, W. L., Saylor, R. D., & Cowling, E. B. (1997). Ozone pollution in the rural United States and the new NAAQS. Science, 276, 916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang, S. C., & Lee, C. T. (2006). Ozone variations through vehicle emissions reductions based on air quality monitoring data in Taipei City, Taiwan, from 1994 to 2003. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 3513–3526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, S. C., & Lee, C. T. (2007a). Assessment of PM10 enhancement by yellow sand on the air quality of Taipei, Taiwan in 2001. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 132, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, S. C., & Lee, C. T. (2007b). Evaluation of the trend of air quality in Taipei, Taiwan from 1994 to 2003. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 127, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, S. C., & Lee, C. T. (2008). Evaluation of the temporal variations of air quality in Taipei City, Taiwan, from 1994 to 2003. Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chock, D. P., Chang, T. Y., Winkler, S. L., & Nance, B. I. (1999). The impact of an 8 h ozone air quality standard on ROG and NOX controls in Southern California. Atmospheric Environment, 33, 2471–2485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chou, C. K., Liu, S. C., Lin, C. Y., Shiu, C. J., & Chang, K. H. (2006). The trend of surface ozone in Taipei, Taiwan, and its causes: Implications for ozone control strategies. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 3898–3908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coyle, M., Smith, R. I., Stedman, J. R., Weston, K. J., & Fowler, D. (2002). Quantifying the spatial distribution of the surface ozone concentration in the UK. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 1013–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derwent, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Saunders, S. M., Pilling, M. J., Simmonds, P. G., Passant, N. R., et al. (2003). Photochemical ozone in north-west Europe and its control. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 1983–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derwent, R. G., Simmonds, P. G., O’Doherty, S., Stevenson, D. S., Collins, W. J., Sanderson, M. G., et al. (2006). External influences on Europe’s air quality: Baseline methane, carbon monoxide and ozone from 1990 to 2030 at Mace head, Ireland. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 844–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1998). National air quality and emission trends reports, 1997 (EPA report No. EPA 454/R-98-016). Research Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
  12. Jenkin, M. E., Davies, T. J., & Stedman, J. R. (2002). The origin and day-of-week dependence of photochemical ozone episodes in the UK. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 999–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kley, D., Geiss, H., & Mohnen, V. A. (1994). Tropospheric ozone at elevated sites and precursor emissions in the United States and Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 28, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lefohn, A. S., Foley, J. K., Shadwick, D. S., & Tilton, B. E. (1993). Changes in diurnal patterns related to changes in ozone levels. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 43, 1472–1478.Google Scholar
  15. Lin, T. H. (2001). Long-range transport of yellow sand to Taiwan in Spring 2000: Observed evidence and simulation. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 5873–5882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin, C. Y., Jacob, D. J., Munger, J. W., & Fiore, A. M. (2000). Increasing background ozone in surface air over the United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 3465–3468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin, C. Y., Liu, S. C., Chou, C. K., Huang, S. J., Liu, C. M., Kuo, C. H., et al. (2005). Long-range transport of aerosols and their impact on the air quality of Taiwan. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 6066–6076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu, S. C., Trainer, M., Fehsenfeld, F. C., Parrish, D. D., Williams, E. J., Fahey, D. W., et al. (1987). Ozone production in the rural troposphere and the implications for regional and global ozone distribution. Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 4191–4207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Qin, Y., Tonnesen, G. S., & Wang, Z. (2004). One-hour and eight-hour average ozone in the California South Coast air quality management district: Trends in peak values and sensitivity to precursors. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 2197–2207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reynolds, S. D., Blanchard, C. L., & Ziman, S. D. (2003). Understanding the effectiveness of precursor reductions in lowing 8-hr ozone concentrations. Journal of Air & Waste Management Association, 53, 195–205.Google Scholar
  21. Reynolds, S. D., Blanchard, C. L., & Ziman, S. D. (2004). Understanding the effectiveness of precursor reductions in lowing 8-hrozone concentrations—Part II. The Eastern United States. Journal of Air & Waste Management Association, 54, 1452–1470.Google Scholar
  22. Saylor, R. D., Chameides, W. L., & Cowling, E. B. (1998). Implications of the new ozone ambient air quality national standards for compliance in rural areas. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 31137–31141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seinfeld, J. H. (1989). Urban air pollution: State of art. Science, 243(4892), 745–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simmonds, P. G., Derwent, R. G., Manning, A. L., & Spain, G. (2004). Significant growth in surface ozone at Mace Head, Ireland, 1987–2003. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 4769–4778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stedman, J. R., & Kent, A. J. (2008). An analysis of the spatial patterns of human health related surface ozone metrics across the UK in 1995, 2003 and 2005. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 1702–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA) (2007). Taiwan environmental database.
  27. Vingarzan, R. (2004). A review of surface ozone background levels and trends. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 3431–3442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu-Kai Lin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ta-Hsiung Lin
    • 3
  • Shuenn-Chin Chang
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Environmental Protection AdministrationTaipeiRepublic of China
  2. 2.Institute of Environmental HealthNational Taiwan University College of Public HealthTaipeiRepublic of China
  3. 3.Department and Graduate School of Environmental Resources ManagementTransworld Institute of TechnologyDouliuRepublic of China
  4. 4.National Defense Medical CenterSchool of Public HealthTaipeiRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations