Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 163, Issue 1–4, pp 619–641 | Cite as

A macroinvertebrate assessment of Ozark streams located in lead–zinc mining areas of the Viburnum Trend in southeastern Missouri, USA

  • Barry C. Poulton
  • Ann L. Allert
  • John M. Besser
  • Christopher J. Schmitt
  • William G. Brumbaugh
  • James F. Fairchild
Article

Abstract

The Viburnum Trend lead–zinc mining subdistrict is located in the southeast Missouri portion of the Ozark Plateau. In 2003 and 2004, we assessed the ecological effects of mining in several watersheds in the region. We included macroinvertebrate surveys, habitat assessments, and analysis of metals in sediment, pore water, and aquatic biota. Macroinvertebrates were sampled at 21 sites to determine aquatic life impairment status (full, partial, or nonsupport) and relative biotic condition scores. Macroinvertebrate biotic condition scores were significantly correlated with cadmium, nickel, lead, zinc, and specific conductance in 2003 (r = −0.61 to −0.68) and with cadmium, lead, and pore water toxic units in 2004 (r = −0.55 to −0.57). Reference sites were fully supporting of aquatic life and had the lowest metals concentrations and among the highest biotic condition scores in both years. Sites directly downstream from mining and related activities were partially supporting, with biotic condition scores 10% to 58% lower than reference sites. Sites located greater distances downstream from mining activities had intermediate scores and concentrations of metals. Results indicate that elevated concentrations of metals originating from mining activities were the underlying cause of aquatic life impairment in several of the streams studied. There was general concurrence among the adversely affected sites in how the various indicators responded to mining activities during the overall study.

Keywords

Bioassessment Macroinvertebrates Streams Mining Ozark region 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allert, A. L., Fairchild, J. F., DiStefano, R. J., Schmitt, C. J., Besser, J. M., Brumbaugh, W. G., et al. (2008). Effects of lead–zinc mining on crayfish (Orconectes hylas) in the Black River watershed, Missouri, USA. Freshwater Crayfish, 16, 99–113.Google Scholar
  2. Applegate, J. M., Baumann, P. C., Emery, E. B., & Wooten, M. S. (2007). First steps in developing a multimetric macroinvertebrate index for the Ohio River. River Research and Applications, 23(7), 683–697. doi:10.1002/rra.1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axtmann, E. V., & Luoma, S. N. (1991). Large-scale distribution of metal contamination in the fine grained sediments of the Clark Fork River, Montana. Applied Geochemistry, 6, 75–88. doi:10.1016/0883-2927(91)90064-V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bain, M. B., & Stevenson, N. J. (1999). Aquatic habitat assessment: Common methods (p. 216). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, J. (1982). Stream classification guidelines for Wisconsin. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin.Google Scholar
  6. Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D., & Stribling, J. B. (1999). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish (2nd edn.). EPA 841/B-99/002. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  7. Barbour, M. T., Stribling, J. B., & Karr, J. R. (1995). Multimetric approach for establishing biocriteria and measuring biological condition. In W. S. Davis & T. P. Simon (Eds.), Biological assessment and criteria: Tools for water resource planning and decision making (pp. 63–77). Boca Raton: Lewis.Google Scholar
  8. Besser, J. M., Brumbaugh, W. G., Allert, A. L., Poulton, B. C., Schmitt, C. J., & Ingersoll, C. G. (2009). Ecological impacts of lead mining on Ozark streams: Toxicity of sediment and pore water. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 72, 516–526. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Besser, J. M., Brumbaugh, W. G., May, T. W., & Schmitt, C. J. (2007). Biomonitoring of lead, zinc, and cadmium in streams draining lead-mining and non-mining areas, southeast Missouri, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 129, 227–241. doi:10.1007/s10661-006-9356-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brumbaugh, W. G., Petty, J. D., Huckins, J. N., & Manahan, S. E. (2002). Stabilized liquid membrane device (SLMD) for the passive, integrative sampling of labile metals in water. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 133, 109–119. doi:10.1023/A:1012923529742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brumbaugh, W. G., May, T. W., Besser, J. M., Allert, A. L., & Schmitt, C. J. (2007). Assessment of elemental concentrations in streams of the New Lead Belt in southeastern Missouri, 2002–05. United States Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report SIR 2007-5057. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2007/5057/pdf/SIR07-5057.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2008.
  12. Burrows, I. G., & Whitton, B. A. (1983). Heavy metals in water, sediments and invertebrates from a metal-contaminated river free of organic pollution. Hydrobiologia, 106, 263–273. doi:10.1007/BF00008125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cain, D. J., Luoma, S. N., Carter, J. L., & Fend, S. V. (1992). Aquatic insects as bioindicators of trace element contamination in cobble-bottom rivers and streams. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 2141–2154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlisle, D. M., & Clements, W. H. (1999). Sensitivity and variability of metrics used in biological assessments of running waters. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18(2), 285–291. doi:10.1897/1551-5028(1999)018<0285:SAVOMU>2.3.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chadwick, J. W., Canton, S. P., & Dent, R. L. (1986). Recovery of benthic invertebrate communities in Silver Bow Creek, Montana, following improved metal mine wastewater treatment. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 28, 427–438.Google Scholar
  16. Clements, W. H., Carlisle, D. M., Lazorchak, J. M., & Johnson, P. C. (2000). Heavy metals structure benthic communities in Colorado mountain streams. Ecological Applications, 10, 626–638. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0626:HMSBCI]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cuffney, T. F., Gurtz, M. E., & Meador, M. R. (1993). Methods for collecting benthic invertebrate samples as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. United States Geological Survey Open File Report 93-406. http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/protocols/OFR-93-406/. Accessed 24 October 2008.
  18. Czarneski, J. (1985). Accumulation of lead in fish from Missouri streams affected by lead mining. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 34, 736–745. doi:10.1007/BF01609801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davies, S. P., & Jackson, S. K. (2006). The Biological Condition Gradient—A conceptual model for interpreting detrimental change in aquatic ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 16(4), 1251–1266. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1251:TBCGAD]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DiStefano, R. J. (2005). Trophic interactions between Missouri Ozarks stream crayfish communities and sport fish predators: Increased abundance and size structure of predators cause little change in crayfish community densities. Final report, Dingell-Johnson Project F-1-R-054, Study S-41, Job 4, Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
  21. Dixit, S. S., & Whitcomb, D. (1983). Heavy metal burden in water, substrate, and macroinvertebrate body tissue of a polluted River Irwell (England). Environmental Pollution (Series B), 6, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duchrow, R. M. (1983). Effects of lead tailings on benthos and water quality of three Ozark streams. Transactions of the Missouri Academy of Science, Missouri Academy of Science, 17(2), 5–17.Google Scholar
  23. Duchrow, R. M., Robinson-Wilson, E., & Trial, L. (1980). The effects of lead mine tailings on the water quality of Logan Creek, Reynolds County, Missouri. Internal report 1980, p. 29. Columbia, MO: Missouri Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
  24. Eisler, R. (1988). Lead hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: A synoptic review. Contaminant hazard reviews. Biological report 85 (1.14). Laurel, MD: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.Google Scholar
  25. Feldmann, R. S., & Connor, E. F. (1992). The relationship between pH and community structure of invertebrates in streams of the Shennandoah National Park, Virginia, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology, 27, 261–276. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00538.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Femmer, S. R. (2004). Background and comparison of water-quality, streambed-sediment, and biological characteristics of streams in the Viburnum Trend and the exploration study areas, southern Missouri. Water-resources investigations report 03-4285. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  27. Ferderer, D. A. (1996). National Overview of Abandoned Mine Land Sites Utilizing the Minerals Availability System (MAS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) Technology. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-549. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1996/ofr-96-0549/ofr-96-549.html. Accessed 24 October 2008.
  28. Gale, N. L., Wixson, B. G., Hardie, M. G., & Jennett, J. L. (1973). Aquatic organisms and heavy metals in Missouri’s new lead belt. American Water Resources Bulletin, 9, 673–688. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1973.tb01790.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haggard, B. E., Storm, D. E., Tejral, R. D., Popova, Y. A., Keyworth, V. G., & Stanley, E. H. (2001). Stream nutrient retention in three northeastern Oklahoma agriculture catchments. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 44(3), 597–605.Google Scholar
  30. Hamilton, K., & Bergersen, E. P. (1984). Methods to estimate aquatic habitat variables. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (p. 372). Fort Collins: Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Colorado State University.Google Scholar
  31. Hayslip, G. A. (1993). EPA Region 10 in-stream biological monitoring handbook (for wadeable streams in the Pacific Northwest). Environmental Services Division, EPA-910-9-92-013. Seattle, WA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  32. Hoiland, W. K., & Rabe, F. W. (1992). Effects of increasing zinc levels and habitat degradation on macroinvertebrate communities in three northern Idaho streams. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 7(4), 373–380.Google Scholar
  33. Hoiland, W. K., Rabe, F. W., & Biggam, R. C. (1994). Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from metal pollution in the South Fork and mainstem of the Coer d’Alene River, Idaho. Water Environment Research, 66(1), 84–88.Google Scholar
  34. Hudson-Edwards, K., Macklin, M., & Taylor, M. (1997). Historic metal mining inputs to Tees river sediment. The Science of the Total Environment, 194/195, 437–445. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(96)05381-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Humphrey, S., & Lister, K. (2004). Biological assessment study: Indian Creek and Courtois Creek, Washington County, 2001–2002. Jefferson City, MO: Department of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  36. Imes, J. L. (2002). Geohydrological and biological investigations associated with a new lead–zinc exploration area near Winona, Missouri, and the Viburnum Trend of southeastern Missouri. Fact Sheet FS 0005-02. Rolla, MO: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  37. Imes, J., Plummer, N. L., Kleeshculte, M. J., & Schumacher, J. G. (2007). Recharge area, base-flow and quick-flow discharge rates and ages, and general water quality of Big Spring in Carter County, Missouri, 2000–04. Scientific investigations report 2007-5049. Rolla, MO: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  38. Jessey, D. R. (1981). An investigation of the nickel-cobalt occurrence in the southeast Missouri mining district. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri-Rolla, p. 217.Google Scholar
  39. Karr, J. R., & Kerans, B. L. (1991). Components of biological integrity: Their definition and use in development of an invertebrate IBI. Environmental sciences division report 905-R-92-003. Chicago, IL: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  40. Kerans, B. L., & Karr, J. R. (1994). A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley. Ecological Applications, 4(4), 768–785. doi:10.2307/1942007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kiffney, P. M., & Clements, W. H. (1994). Effects of heavy metals on a macroinvertebrate assemblage from a Rocky Mountain stream in experimental microcosms. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 13(4), 511–523. doi:10.2307/1467847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kleeschulte, M. J. (2000). Ground- and surface-water relations in the Eleven Point and Current River Basins, south-central Missouri. Fact Sheet 032-00. Rolla, MO: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  43. Kleeschulte, M. J. (2003). Geohydrological and biological investigations associated with lead–zinc exploration and mining in southeastern Missouri. http://mo.water.usgs.gov/mining/leadmining.htm.
  44. Kleeschulte, M. J., & Seeger, C. M. (2003). Stratigraphy and vertical hydraulic specific conductance of the St. Francois confining unit in the Viburnum Trend and evaluation of the unit in the Viburnum Trend and exploration areas, southeastern Missouri. Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4329. Rolla, MO: U.S. Geological Survey Report.Google Scholar
  45. Klemm, D. J., Lewis, P. A., Fulk, F., & Lazorchak, J. M. (1990). Macroinvertebrate field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters. EPA/600/4-90/030. Location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Monitoring Series Report.Google Scholar
  46. Kreis, R. G. Jr. (1988). Integrated study of exposure and biological effects of in-place sediment pollutant in the upper connecting channels [Trenton Channel, Detroit River]: Interim results. Grosse Ile, MI: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, LLRS.Google Scholar
  47. Lister, K. B., & Humphrey, S. (2005). Biological assessment and fine sediment study: Big River (lower): Irondale to Washington State Park, St Francois, Washington, and Jefferson Counties, Missouri. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Department of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  48. Mining and Quarry World (2004). U.S. lead leader. Mining and Quarry World Journal, 1(3), 14–21.Google Scholar
  49. Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) (2003). Semi-quantitative macroinvertebrate stream bioassessment project procedure. Jefferson City, MO: Air & Land Protection Div., Environmental Services Program.Google Scholar
  50. Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) (2004). The mineral industry of Missouri: Geological Survey and Resources Assessment Division. http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/state/2004/mostmyb04.pdf.
  51. Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) (2007). The stat0065 of Missouri’s Environment: 2007. Pub. #1332. Jefferson City, MO.Google Scholar
  52. Missouri Natural Heritage Program. (2007). Missouri species and communities of conservation concern checklist. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Dept. of Conservation.Google Scholar
  53. Petersen, J. C., Adamski, J. C., Bell, R. W., Davis, J. V., Femmer, S. R., Freiwald, D. A., et al. (1998). Water quality in the Ozark Plateaus, Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma, 1992–95. Circular, 1158. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  54. Pflieger, W. L. (1996). The crayfishes of Missouri. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
  55. Platts, W. S., Megahan, W. F., & Minshall, G. W. (1983). Methods for evaluating stream, riparian, and biotic conditions. General technical report INT-138. Ogden, UT: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  56. Poulton, B. C., Monda, D. P., Woodward, D. F., Wildhaber, M. L., & Brumbaugh, W. G. (1995). Relations between benthic community structure and metals concentrations in aquatic macroinvertebrates: Clark Fork River, Montana. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 10(3), 277–293.Google Scholar
  57. Poulton, B. C., Rasmussen, T. J., & Lee, C. J. (2007). Assessment of biological conditions at selected stream sites in Johnson County, Kansas and Cass and Jackson Counties, Missouri, 2003 and 2004. Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5108. Columbia, MO: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  58. Probst, W. E., Rabeni, C. F., Covington, W. G., & Marteney, R. E. (1984). Resource use by stream-dwelling rock bass and smallmouth bass. Transactions of American Fisheries Society, 113, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rabeni, C. F. (1992). Trophic linkage between stream centrarchids and their crayfish prey. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 49, 1714–1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rabeni, C. F., & Doisy, K. E. (2000). Correspondence of stream benthic invertebrate assemblages to regional classification schemes in Missouri. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 19(3), 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rabeni, C. F., & Sowa, S. P. (2002). A landscape approach to managing the biota of rivers and streams. In J. Liu and W. W. Taylor (Eds.), Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management (pp. 114–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reish, D. J., & Gerlinger, T. V. (1964). The effects of cadmium, lead, and zinc on survival and reproduction in the polychaetous annelid Neanthes arenaceodentata (F. Nereididae). In P. A. Hutchings (Ed.), Proceedings of the first international polychaete conference (pp. 383–389). Sidney: Linnean Society N.S.W.Google Scholar
  63. Rosenberg, D. M., & Resh, V. H. (Eds.) (1993). Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates (p. 488). New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  64. Ryck, F. M. (1974). Water quality survey of the southeast Ozark mining area, 1965–1971., Aquatic Series report no. 10. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
  65. Ryck, F. M., & Whitley, J. R. (1974). Pollution abatement in the lead mining district of Missouri. Proceedings of the Purdue Industrial Waste Conference, 29, 857–863.Google Scholar
  66. Sarver, R. J., & McCord, S. (2005). Taxonomic levels for macroinvertebrate identifications, and biotic index values for macroinvertebrate taxa found in Missouri. SOP# MDNR-WQMS-209. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Air & Land Protection Division, Environmental Services Program.Google Scholar
  67. Sarver, R., Harlan, S., Rabeni, C. F., & Sowa, S. P. (2002). Biological criteria for wadeable/perennial streams of Missouri. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Air & Land Protection Division, Environmental Services Program.Google Scholar
  68. Scheiring, J. F. (1993). Effects of surface mine drainage on leaf litter insect communities and detritus processing in headwater streams. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 66(1), 31–40.Google Scholar
  69. Schmitt, C. J., & Finger, S. E. (1982). The transport, fate, and effects of trace metals in the Big and Black River watersheds, Southeastern Missouri. Final report to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia National Fisheries Research Laboratory, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
  70. Schmitt, C. J., & Finger, S. E. (1987). The effects of sample preparation on the measured concentrations of eight elements in the edible tissues of fish contaminated by lead mining. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 16, 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schmitt, C. J., Wildhaber, M. L., Hunn, J. B., Nash, T., Tieger, M. N., & Steadman, B. L. (1993). Biomonitoring of lead-contaminated Missouri streams with an assay for erythrocyte δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALA-D) activity in fish blood. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 25, 464–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schmitt, C. J., Brumbaugh, W. G., & May, T. W. (2007a). Accumulation of metals in fish from lead–zinc mining areas of southeastern Missouri, USA. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 67(1), 14–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schmitt, C. J., Whyte, J. J., Roberts, A. P., Annis, M. L., & Tillitt, D. E. (2007b). Biomarkers of metals exposure in fish from lead–zinc mining in southeastern Missouri, USA. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 67(1), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shackleford, B. (1988). Rapid bioassessments of lotic macroinvertebrate communities: Biocriteria development (p. 44). Little Rock: Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology.Google Scholar
  75. Smock, L. A. (1983). The influence of feeding habits on whole-body metals concentrations in aquatic insects. Freshwater Biology, 13, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Soucek, D. J., Cherry, D. S., Currie, R. L., Latimer, H. A., & Claire, T. G. (2000). Laboratory to field validation in an integrative assessment of an acid mine drainage-impacted watershed. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19(4), 1036–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sowa, S. P., Annis, G. M., Diamond, D. D., Figg, D., Morey, M. E., & Nigh, T. (2004). An overview of the data developed for the Missouri Aquatic GAP project and an example of how it is being used for conservation planning. Gap Analysis Bulletin, 12, 7–19.Google Scholar
  78. Sowa, S. P., Annis, G. M., Morey, M. E., & Diamond, D. D. (2007). A gap analysis and comprehensive conservation strategy for riverine ecosystems of Missouri. Ecological Monographs, 77(3), 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Starnes, L. B., & Gasper, D. C. (1996). Effects of surface mining on aquatic resources in North America. Fisheries, 21(5), 24–26.Google Scholar
  80. Sumi, Y., Fukuoka, H. R., Murakami, T., Suzuki, T., Hatakeyama, S., & Suzuki, K. T. (1991). Histochemical localization of copper, iron and zinc in the larvae of the mayfly Baetis thermicus inhabiting a river polluted with heavy metals. Zoological Science, 8, 287–293.Google Scholar
  81. Timmermans, K. R., Van Hattum, B., Kraak, M. H. S., & Davids, C. (1989). Trace metals in a littoral foodweb: Concentrations in organisms, sediment, and water. Science of the Total Environment, 87/88, 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2005). Project plan for Mark Twain National Forest. http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/marktwain/projects/forest_plan/.
  83. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1983). Waterbody surveys and assessments for conducting use attainability analysis. Technical support manual. Washington, DC: Office of Water Regulations and Standards.Google Scholar
  84. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990). Biological Criteria: National program guidance for surface waters. EPA-440/5-90-004. Washington, DC: Office of Water.Google Scholar
  85. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1994). Lead–zinc mining industry profile, environmental effects. Technical resource document, extraction and beneficiation of ores and minerals, vol. I, lead–zinc. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.Google Scholar
  86. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000). National water quality inventory: 1998 report to Congress. EPA 841-R-00-001. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  87. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002). National recommended water quality criteria. http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/aqlife.htm.
  88. Vinyard, J. D., & Feder, G. L. (1974). Springs of Missouri. Water resources report 29 (p. 212). Rolla, MO: Missouri Geological Survey and Water Resources.Google Scholar
  89. Washington, H. G. (1984). Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: A review with special reference to aquatic systems. Water Resources, 18(6), 653–694.Google Scholar
  90. Wildhaber, M. L., & Schmitt, C. J. (1996). Estimating aquatic toxicity as determined through laboratory tests of Great Lakes sediments containing complex mixtures of environmental contaminants. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 41, 255–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Winner, R. W., Boesel, M. W., & Farrell, M. P. (1980). Insect community structure as an index of heavy metal pollution in lotic ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37, 647–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wixson, B. G. (Ed.) (1977). The Missouri lead study, vol. 1—An interdisciplinary investigation of environmental pollution by lead and other heavy metals from industrial development in the New Lead Belt of southeastern Missouri. Final report to National Science Foundation, Research Applied to National Needs Program, University of Missouri, Columbia and Rolla, Missouri.Google Scholar
  93. Woodward, D. F., Brumbaugh, W. G., DeLonay, A. J., Little, E. E., & Smith, C. E. (1994). Effects on rainbow trout fry of a metals-contaminated diet of benthic invertebrates from the Clark Fork River, Montana. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 123, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Woodward, D. F., Farag, A. M., Bergman, H. L., DeLonay, E. E., Smith, C. E., & Barrows, F. T. (1995). Metals-contaminated benthic invertebrates in the Clark Fork River, Montana: Effects on age-0 brown trout. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 52, 1992–1994.Google Scholar
  95. Yoder, C. O., & DeShon, J. E. (2003). Using biological response signatures within a framework of multiple indicators to assess and diagnose causes and sources of impairments to aquatic assemblages in selected Ohio rivers and streams. In T. P. Simon (Ed.), Biological response signatures: Indicator patterns using aquatic communities (pp. 23–81). Boca Raton: Lewis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry C. Poulton
    • 1
  • Ann L. Allert
    • 1
  • John M. Besser
    • 1
  • Christopher J. Schmitt
    • 1
  • William G. Brumbaugh
    • 1
  • James F. Fairchild
    • 1
  1. 1.Columbia Environmental Research CenterU.S. Geological SurveyColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations