Vertical gradients of mineral elements in Pinus sylvestris crown in alkalised soil

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Alkalisation of soil has been assumed to be the principal cause of changes in vertical gradients of nutrients in Pinus sylvestris crown. The long-term influence of alkaline dust pollution (\({\rm {pH}}_{{\rm H}_{2}{\rm O}}\) 12.3–12.6) emitted from a cement plant on the element composition of soil and needles of Scots pine in different canopy layers was studied. In the polluted area, the pH of soils was >7, and high amounts of Ca, K and Mg were measured in the upper layers of soil (0–30 cm), while the mobility and solubility of some contaminants have decreased, nutrition processes have become complicated, and imbalance of mineral composition of trees was revealed. Reduced N and increased K, Ca and Mg concentrations in needles were observed in the heavily polluted area. Vertical gradients of elements and their ratios in canopies varied depending on the alkalisation level of soil. Needles on the upper-crown shoots had higher concentrations of N, C, Ca and Mg and lower concentrations of P and K compared to the lower layer of the crown. In the unpolluted area, higher concentrations of N, P, K and Ca were found in lower-crown needles and of C and Mg in needles at the top of the canopy. The P/N ratio below 0.125 indicated P deficiency in pines. The ratios N/Ca, N/Mg and N/K had significantly decreased, while the ratios Ca/Mg, K/Mg and K/Ca had a tendency to increase in heavily polluted sample plots. Magnitude of changes of element ratios indicates on the disbalances of availability and translocation of nutrients in the crown of trees.

Keywords

Alkalisation Cement dust Pinus sylvestris Vertical gradient Nutrient Partitioning Crown 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ali, A. A., Ikeda, M., & Yamada, Y. (1987). Effect of the supply of potassium, calcium and magnesium on the absorption, translocation and assimilation of ammonium- and nitrate-nitrogen in wheat plants. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 33, 585–594.Google Scholar
  2. Brooks, J. R., Sprugel, D. G., & Hinckley, T. M. (1996). The effects of light acclimation during and after foliage expansion on photosynthesis of Abies amabilis foliage within the canopy. Oecologia, 107, 21–32. doi:10.1007/BF00582231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, R. B., & Stokes, P. M. (1986). Overview of historical and paleoecological studies of acidic air pollution and its effects. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 30, 311–318. doi:10.1007/BF00305202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Environmental Review Kunda 2007, No.16 (2007). (16 pp.). Kunda Nordic Heidelberg Cement Group, Kunda, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  5. Ericsson, T. (1994). Nutrient dynamics and requirements of forest crops. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 24, 133–168.Google Scholar
  6. Estonian Environment 1991 (1991). Environmental report 4 (64 pp.). Environmental Data Centre, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  7. Estonian Environment 1995 (1996). (96 pp.). Ministry of the Environment of Estonia, Environmental Information Centre, Tallinn.Google Scholar
  8. Farmer, A. M. (1993). The effect of dust on vegetation—a review. Environmental Pollution, 79, 63–75. doi:10.1016/0269-7491(93)90179-R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Formánek, P., & Vranová, V. (2002). A contribution to the effect of liming on forest soils: Review of literature. Journal of Forest Science, 48, 182–190.Google Scholar
  10. Grassi, G., & Bagnaresi, U. (2001). Foliar morphological and physiological plasticity in Picea abies and Abies alba saplings along a natural light gradient. Tree Physiology, 21, 959–967.Google Scholar
  11. Güsewell, S., Koerselman, W., & Verhoeven, J. T. A. (2003). Biomass N: P ratios as indicators of nutrient limitation for plant populations in wetlands. Ecological Applications, 13, 372–384. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0372:BNRAIO]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han, Q., Kawasaki, T., Katahata, S., Mukai, Y., & Chiba, Y. (2003). Horizontal and vertical variations in photosynthetic capacity in a Pinus densiflora crown in relation to leaf nitrogen allocation and acclimation to irradiance. Tree Physiology, 23, 851–857.Google Scholar
  13. Hellmann, B. (1993). N2O-Emissionen aus unterschiedlich behandelten Fichtenstandorten im Höglwald. Schriftenreihe des Fraunhofer-Institut für Atmosphärische Umweltforschung 19, 278.Google Scholar
  14. Hons, F. M., & Aljoe, K. D. (1985). Effects of applied calcium on growth and ammonium utilization by corn. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 16, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingestad, T. (1962). Macroelement nutrition of pine, spruce and birch seedlings in nutrient solutions. Meddelanden från Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut, 51, 1–150.Google Scholar
  16. Ingestad, T. (1979). Mineral nutrient requirements of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum, 45, 373–380. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1979.tb02599.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ingestad, T. (1981). Nutrition and growth of birch and grey alder seedlings in low conductivity solutions and at varied relative rates of nutrient addition. Physiologia Plantarum, 52, 454–466. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1981.tb02716.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ingestad, T. (1987). New concepts on soil fertility and plant nutrition as illustrated by research on forest trees and stands. Geoderma, 40, 237–252. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(87)90035-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ingestad, T., & Ågren, G. I. (1988). Nutrient uptake and allocation at steady-state nutrition. Physiologia Plantarum, 72, 450–459. doi:110.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb09150.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ISO/10390 (1994). Soil quality. Determination of pH.Google Scholar
  21. ISO/11260 (1995). Soil quality. Determination of CEC and base saturation.Google Scholar
  22. ISO/11261 (1995). Soil quality. Determination of total nitrogen. Modified Kjeldahl Method.Google Scholar
  23. Jäger, H. J. (1980). Indikation von Luftverunreinigungen durch morphometrische Untersuchungen an höheren Pflanzen. In R. Schubert, & J. Schuh (Eds.), Bioindikation 3. Wissenschaftliche Beiträge 26 (pp. 43–52). Halle, Wittenberg: Martin-Luther-Universität.Google Scholar
  24. Kaasik, M., & Sõukand, Ü. (2000). Balance of alkaline and acidic pollution loads in the area affected by oil shale combustion. Oil Shale, 17, 113–128.Google Scholar
  25. Kaasik, M., Alliksaar, T., Ivask, J., & Loosaar, J. (2005). Spherical fly ash particles from oil shale fired power plants in atmospheric precipitations. Possibilities of quantitative tracing. Oil Shale, 22, 547–561.Google Scholar
  26. Kangur, A. (1988). Changes of chlorophyll content in pine needles in the industrial region of northern Estonia. In T. Frey (Ed.), Problems of contemporary ecology (pp. 53–57). Tartu: Tartu State University, (in Estonian).Google Scholar
  27. Kannukene, L. (1995). Bryophytes in the forest ecosystem influenced by cement dust. In M. Mandre (Ed.), Dust pollution and forest ecosystems. A study of conifers in an alkalized environment. Publication 3 (pp.141–148). Tallinn: Institute of Ecology.Google Scholar
  28. Kaupenjohann, M. (1989). Effects of acid rain on soil chemistry and nutrient availability in the soil. In E.-D. Schulze, O. L. Lange, & R. Oren (Eds.), Forest decline and air pollution: A study of spruce (Picea abies) on acid soils (pp. 297–335). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Keskkond’90 (1991). Eesti Keskkonnaministeerium, Tallinn. (97 pp.) (in Estonian).Google Scholar
  30. Kim, S.-T., Maeda, Y., & Tsujino, Y. (2004). Assessment of the effect of air pollution on material damages in Northeast Asia. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klõšeiko, J. (2003). Carbohydrate metabolism of conifers in alkalised growth conditions. Doctoral thesis (183 pp). Tartu: Estonian Agricultural University.Google Scholar
  32. Knecht Billberger, M. F. (2006). Plant growth—stoiciometry and competition. Theory development in ecosystem ecology. Doctoral thesis. (20 pp.). Department of Ecology and Environmental Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Uppsala.Google Scholar
  33. Knowles, R. (1981). Denitrification. In E. A. Paul, & J. N. Ladd (Eds.), Soil biochemistry (Vol. 5, pp. 323–369). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  34. Kozlowski, T., Kramer, P. J., & Pallardy, S. G. (1991). The physiological ecology of woody plants (657 pp). San Diego, New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  35. Lal, B., & Ambasht, R. S. (1982). Impact of cement dust on the mineral and energy concentration of Psidium guayava. Environmental Pollution, 29A, 241–247.Google Scholar
  36. Landis, T. D. (1985). Mineral nutrition as an index of seedling quality. In M. L. Duryea (Ed.), Evaluating seedling quality: Principles, procedures and predictive abilities of major tests (pp. 29–48). Corvallis: Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  37. Leal, D. B., & Thomas, S. C. (2003). Vertical gradients and tree-to-tree variation in shoot morphology and foliar nitrogen in an old-growth Pinus strobus stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33, 1304–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lõhmus, K., & Lasn, R. (1990). Spruce and pine root structures and chemical characteristics in moderate acid soils. In H. Persson (Ed.), Above- and below-ground interactions in forest trees in acidified soils. Air Pollution Research Report 32 (pp. 74–78). Uppsala: Environmental Research Programme of the Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  39. Mandre, M. (1995). Dust emission and deposition. In M. Mandre (Ed.), Dust pollution and forest ecosystems. A study of conifers in an alkalized environment. Publication 3 (pp. 18–22). Tallinn: Institute of Ecology.Google Scholar
  40. Mandre, M. (2000). Stress induced changes in lignin and nutrient partitioning in Picea abies L. Karst. Baltic Forestry, 6, 30–36.Google Scholar
  41. Mandre, M. (2002). Relationships between lignin and nutrients in Picea abies L. under alkaline air pollution. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 133, 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mandre, M., & Klõšeiko, J. (1997). Changing carbohydrate partitioning in 6-year-old coniferous trees after prolonged exposure to cement dust. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 52c, 586–594.Google Scholar
  43. Mandre, M., & Tuulmets, L. (1995). Changes in the pigment system. In M. Mandre (Ed.), Dust pollution and forest ecosystems. A study of conifers in an alkalized environment. Publication 3 (pp. 66–77). Tallinn: Institute of Ecology.Google Scholar
  44. Mandre, M., & Tuulmets, L. (1997). Biochemical diagnosis of forest decline. Baltic Forestry, 3, 19–25.Google Scholar
  45. Mandre, M., Kangur, A., Laur, L., Pihlakas, E., & Ploompuu, T. (1986). Physiological-Biochemical state of plants in Kunda in 1985. II. Scots Pine (96 pp.). Report in Kunda Tsement, Tallinn, (in Estonian).Google Scholar
  46. Mandre, M., Rauk, J., Poom, K., & Pöör, M. (1995). Estimation of economical losses of forests and quality of agricultural plants on the territories affected by air pollution from cement plant in Kunda. In F. Kommonen, A. Estlander, & P. Roto (Eds.), Economic evaluation of major environmental impacts from the planned investments at Kunda Nordic Cement Plant in Estonia. Report IFC, App. 1. Washington: Soil and Water Ltd., Tampere Regional Institute of Occupational Health, International Finance Corporation.Google Scholar
  47. Mandre, M., Tullus, H., & Tamm, Ü. (1998). The partitioning of carbohydrates and biomass of leaves in Populus tremula L. canopy. Trees—Structure and Function, 12, 160–166.Google Scholar
  48. Mandre, M., Klõšeiko, J., Ots, K., & Tuulmets, L. (1999). Changes in phytomass and nutrient partitioning in young conifers in extreme alkaline growth conditions. Environmental Pollution, 105, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marcelis, L. F. M., & Heuvelink, E. (2007). Concepts of modelling carbon allocation among plant organs. In J. Vos, L. F. M. Marcelis, P. H. B. de Visser, P. C. Struik, & J. B. Evers (Eds.), Functional-structural plant modelling in crop production (pp. 103–111). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marschner, H. (2002). Mineral nutrition of higher plants (889 pp). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  51. Müller, M. M., Sundman, V., & Skujinš, J. (1980). Denitrification in low pH spodosols and peats determined with the acetylene inhibition method. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 40, 235–239.Google Scholar
  52. Niinemets, Ü., Lukjanova, A., Turnbull, M. H., & Sparrow, A. D. (2007). Plasticity in mesophyll volume fraction modulates light-acclimation in needle photosynthesis in two pines. Tree Physiology, 27, 1137–1151.Google Scholar
  53. Nilsen, E. T., & Orcutt, D. M. (1996). The physiology of plants under stress (689 pp). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  54. Nilson, E. (1995). Species composition and structure of epiphytic lichen assemblages on Scots pine around the Kunda cement plant. In M. Mandre (Ed.), Dust pollution and forest ecosystems. A study of conifers in an alkalized environment. Publication 3 (pp. 134–140). Tallinn: Institute of Ecology.Google Scholar
  55. Olsson, M. T. (1986). Long-term impact of lime on the humus form in a beech stand on sandy till. Studia Forestalia Suecica, 174, 12.Google Scholar
  56. Ots, K. (2002). Impact of air pollution on the growth of conifers in the industrial region of northeast Estonia. Doctoral thesis (222 pp.). Estonian Agricultural University, Tartu.Google Scholar
  57. Papke-Rothkamp, H. (1994). Einfluß saurer Beregnung und kompensatorischer Kalkung auf die Emission gasförmiger Stickstoffverbindungen aus Böden eines Fichtenbestandes. Schriftenreihe des Fraunhofer-Institut für Atmosphärische Umweltforschung, 25, 175.Google Scholar
  58. Pärn, H. (2002). Relationships between radial growth of Scots pine and climate in the northeastern industrial region of Estonia. Metsanduslikud Uurimused/Forestry Studies, 36, 47–61.Google Scholar
  59. Paul, E. A., & Clark, F. E. (1996). Soil microbiology and biochemistry (340 pp.). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  60. Pearcy, R. W., & Sims, D. A. (1994). Photosynthetic acclimation to changing light environments: Scaling from the leaf to the whole plant. In M. M. Caldwell, & R. W. Pearcy (Eds.), Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants: Ecophysiological processes above and below ground (pp. 145–174). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  61. Porgasaar, V. (1973). Mineral nutrition of scots pine and its diagnostics. Doctoral thesis (196+42 pp). Tartu: Tartu State University, (in Estonian with Russian summary).Google Scholar
  62. Portsmuth, A. (2007). Ecophysiological mechanisms of forest plant growth and biomass distribution. Dissertations on natural sciences 16 (189 pp). Tallinn: Tallinn University.Google Scholar
  63. Portsmuth, A., Niinemets, Ü., Truus, L., & Pensa, M. (2005). Biomass allocation and growth rates in Pinus sylvestris are interactively modified by nitrogen and phosphorus availabilities and by tree size and age. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35, 2346–2359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Posch, S., Warren, C. R., Kruse, J., Guttenberger, H., & Adams, M. A. (2008). Nitrogen allocation and the fate of absorbed light in 21-year-old Pinus radiata. Tree Physiology, 28, 375–384.Google Scholar
  65. Richardson, A. D., Ashton, P. M. S., Berlyn, G. P., McGroddy, M. E., & Cameron, I. R. (2001). Within-crown foliar plasticity of western helmlock, Tsuga heterophylla, in relation to stand age. Annals of Botany, 88, 1007–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rook, D. A. (1991). Seedling development and physiology in relation to mineral nutrition. In R. van den Driessche (Ed.), Mineral nutrition of conifer seedlings (pp. 85–111). Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
  67. Roots, O., Frey, T., Kirjanen, I., Kört, M., & Kohv, N. (1997). Air pollution: Emissions and loads. In Estonian Environmental Monitoring 1996 (pp. 10–12). Ministry of the Environment, Estonian Environment Information Centre, Tallinn.Google Scholar
  68. Schaedle, M. (1991). Nutrient uptake. In R. van den Driessche (Ed.), Mineral nutrition of conifer seedlings (pp. 25–59). Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
  69. Schulte, E. E. (1995). Recommended soil organic matter tests. In T. J. Sims, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Recommended soil testing procedures for the northeastern United States. Northeast Regional Bulletin 493 (pp. 47–56). Newark: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  70. Shalhevet, J. (1993). Plants under salt and water stress. In L. Fowden, T. Mansfield, & J. Stoddart (Eds.), Plant adaptation to environmental stress (pp. 133–155). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  71. Shuman, L. M. (1994). Mineral nutrition. In R. E. Wilkinson (Ed.), Plant–environment interactions (pp. 149–182). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  72. Simek, M., Jsova, L., & Hopkins, D. W. (2002). What is the so-called optimum pH for denitrification in soil? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34, 1227–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Świercz, A. (2006). Suitability of pine bark to evaluate pollution caused by cement-lime dust. Journal of Forest Science, 52, 93–98.Google Scholar
  74. Tessier, J. T., & Raynal, D. J. (2003). Use of nitrogen to phosphorus ratio in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tuulmets, L. (1995). Chemical composition of precipitation. In M. Mandre (Ed.), Dust pollution and forest ecosystems. A study of conifers in an alkalized environment. Publication 3 (pp. 23–32). Tallinn: Institute of Ecology.Google Scholar
  76. Wehrmann, J. (1963). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Blattanalyse in der Forstwirtschaft. Landwirtschaftliche Forschung, 16, 130–145.Google Scholar
  77. Yearbook Forest 2007 (2008). Centre of Forest Protection and Silviculture, Estonian Ministry of Environment, Tartu (217 pp.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecophysiology, Institute of Forestry and Rural EngineeringEstonian University of Life SciencesTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations