Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 157, Issue 1–4, pp 89–96

Land cover changes on the coastal zone of Candarli Bay, Turkey using remotely sensed data

Article

Abstract

Land cover of the Earth is changing dramatically because of human activities. Information about changes is useful for management of natural resources. Rapid land cover changes have taken place in many coastal areas of Turkey over the last two decades due to urbanization and land degradation. In this paper, land cover change dynamics were investigated by the combined use of satellite remote sensing and geographical information systems. The main objective of the study was to determine land-cover transition rates among land cover types in coastal areas of Turkey. A time series of Landsat TM and ASTER images were used to gather land cover change data of the coastal line of Candarli Bay, Izmir, Turkey. The images were classified using supervised classification and a post-classification comparison approach was used in change detection. The results show significant increase in urban areas but decrease in semi natural and agricultural areas.

Keywords

Land cover Change detection Post-classification Multi-temporal imagery Candarli Bay 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acharya, R. (2002). Comparison of change detection techniques in Chitwan District of Nepal. http://www.gisdevelopment.net/aars/acrs/2002/had/156.pdf.
  2. Alphan, H. (2004). Monitoring program on coastal zone management based on remote sensing techniques. Dissertation, Cukurova University.Google Scholar
  3. Ayanz, J. S.-M., Barbosa, P., Schmuck, G., Liberta, G., & Schule, E. (2003). Towards a coherent forest fire information system in Europe: The European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS). Options Mediterraneennes-. Série B, 46, 5–16.Google Scholar
  4. Bossard, M., Feranec, J., & Otahel, J. (2000). CORINE land cover, technical guide-addendum 2000. Report No. 40. Retrieved from European Environmental Agency. http://europa.eu.int.
  5. Bottomley, B. R. (1998). Mapping rural land use and land cover change in Carroll County, Arkansas utilizing multi-temporal Landsat Thematic Mapper satellite imagery. Dissertation, University of Arkansas. http://www.cast.uark.edu/local/brandon_thesis/.
  6. Efe, R. (2000). The impact of land use changes on natural vegetation along the coastal zone between Edremit and Kucukkuyu. In International Symposium on Desertification, Turkey, Proceedings, pp. 222–227.Google Scholar
  7. Erdas Field Guide (1999). ERDAS Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
  8. Guvensen, A., & Oztürk, M. (2003). Halophytic plant diversity of south Aegean coastal zone in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 35(5), 853–864.Google Scholar
  9. Hinrichsen, D. (1998). Coastal waters of the world: Trends, threats and strategies. ISBN 1 55963 383 2, 275 pages. Washington, D.C.: Island Pres.Google Scholar
  10. Huang, W., & Fu, B. (2002). Remote sensing for coastal area management in China. Coastal Management, 30, 271–276. doi:10.1080/08920750290042200.
  11. Jensen, J. R. (2007). Digital techniques of remote sensing. Retrieved from University of South Carolina, Center for GIS and RS. http://www.cas.sc.edu/geog/rslab/751/e11.html.
  12. Jensen, J. R., & Schill, S. R. (2007). General steps required to perform change detection. Vol. 3: Introductory Digital Image Processing, University of South Carolina. http://www.cas.sc.edu/geog/rslab/Rscc/mod8/8-1/8-1.html8-1/8-1.html.
  13. Kesgin, B. (2007). Research on monitoring coastal land use change based on remote sensing techniques. Dissertation, Ege University.Google Scholar
  14. Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., & Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12), 2365–2407. doi:10.1080/0143116031000139863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mas, J. F. (1999). Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(1), 139–152. doi:10.1080/014311699213659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mundia, C. N., & Aniya, M. (2005). Analysis of land use/cover changes and urban expansion of Nairobi city using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(13), 2831–2849. doi:10.1080/01431160500117865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Munyati, C. (2000). Wetland change detection on the Kafue Flats, Zambia by classification of a multitemporal remote sensing image dataset. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(9), 1787–1806. doi:10.1080/014311600209742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muttitanon, W., & Tripathi, N. K. (2005). Land use/land cover changes in the coastal zone of Ban Don Bay, Thailand using Landsat 5 TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(11), 2311–2323. doi:10.1080/0143116051233132666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. National Research Council (2008). Earth observations from space: The first 50 years of scientific achievements. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11991.html. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press.
  20. Nurlu, E., & Erdem, U. (2002). An overview of the Turkish coastal zone management within the framework of the European Union. In D. Camarda & L. Grassini (Eds.), Proceedings of the second meeting on “agriculture and urbanization in the mediterranean region. Enabling-policies for sustainable use of soil and water” (pp. 107–111), Options Mediterraneennes, Series: A, Mediterranean Seminars 53, Bari.Google Scholar
  21. Perdigão, V., & Annoni, A. (1997). Technical and methodological guide for updating CORINE land cover data base. EUR 17288 EN, ECSC-EC-EAEC, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  22. Peterson, D. L., Egbert, S. L., Price, K. P., & Martinko, E. A. (2004). Identifying historical and recent land-cover changes in Kansas using post-classification change detection techniques. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 107(3/4), 105–118. doi:10.1660/0022–8443(2004)107[0105:IHARLC]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Singh, A. (1989). Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(6), 989–1003. doi:10.1080/01431168908903939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tardie, P. S., & Congalton, R. G. (2007). A change-detection analysis: Using remotely sensed data to assess the progression of development in Essex County, Massachusetts from 1990 to 2001. Retrieved from University of New Hampshire Durham. http://www.unh.edu/natural-resources/pdf/tardie-paper1.pdf.
  25. Turkish State Meteorological Service. (2007). Meteorological data of Dikili, from We site: http://izmir.meteor.gov.tr/istasyonlar/dikiliyagis.htm.
  26. U.S. EPA (2000). Projecting land-use change, a summary of models for assessing the effects of community growth and change on land-use patterns. EPA/600/R-00/098, from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Yang, X., & Lo, C. P. (2002). Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(9), 1775–1798. doi:10.1080/01431160110075802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhao, G. X., Lin, G., & Warner, T. (2004). Using Thematic Mapper data for change detection and sustainable use of cultivated land: A case study in the Yellow River delta, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(13), 2509–2522. doi:10.1080/01431160310001619571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape ArchitectureEge UniversityBornova, IzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of AgricultureEge UniversityIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations