A comparative study of macrobenthic community from harbours along the central west coast of India

  • B. Ingole
  • S. Sivadas
  • M. Nanajkar
  • S. Sautya
  • A. Nag
Article

Abstract

Harbours are heavily stressed coastal habitats characterised by high concentration of contaminant and low diversity of benthic community. The west coast of India harbours most of the major harbours compared to the east coast. Very few studies have compared the macrobenthic community between different Indian harbours. The present study was therefore conducted in three important harbour (Ratnagiri, Goa, Karwar) along the central west coast of India. The paper discusses the health status of the three harbours diagnosed using various biotic indices. Sediment samples were collected using van Veen grab (0.11 m2) on board CRV Sagar Sukti. A total of 55 macrobenthic taxa were identified and were numerically dominated by polychaete. Biomass was high (0.14–145.7 g m–2) and was made largely by echiurans (>80%). Overall, polychaete dominated the macrobenthic diversity. Opportunistic P.pinnata, Notomastus sp. and Mediomastus sp., dominated the macrobenthic community responding to the increased in the harbour. Biotic indices (Polychaete:Amphipod ratio, ABC curve and geometric class abundance) and the dominance of opportunistic species indicate that, the three harbours are under stress from anthropogenic activities.

Keywords

Macrobenthos Polychaetes Harbour pollution West coast India 

References

  1. Anon (2003). Road Map for Oil Spill Management for India. In A report of the project review and monitoring committee for oil spill management.Google Scholar
  2. Anon (1996). Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Coastal Pollution. Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India, (30 pp). New Delhi.Google Scholar
  3. Ansari, Z. A., Achuthankutty, C. T., & Dalal, S. G. (2006). Overexploitation of fishery resources, with particular reference Goa. In S. Sonak (Ed.), Multiple dimension of global environmental change (pp. 285–299). New Delhi: TERI Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ansari, Z. A., Sreepada, R. A., & Kanti, A. (1994). Macro benthic assemblage in the soft sediment of Mormugao harbour, Goa (central west coast of India). Indian Journal of Marine Science, 23, 225–231.Google Scholar
  5. Belan, T. A. (2003). Marine environmental quality assessment using polychaete taxocene characteristics in Vancouver harbour. Marine Environmental Research, 57, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryan, G. W., & Langston, W. J. (1992). Bioavailability, accumulation and effects of heavy metals in sediments with a special reference to United Kingdom estuaries: A review. Environmental Pollution, 76, 89–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrasco, F. D. (1997). Sublittoral macrobenthic fauna off Punta Coloso, Antofagasta, northern Chile: High persistence of the polychaete assemblages. Bulletin of Marine Science, 60, 443–459.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, K. R., & Warwick, R. M. (1994). Changes in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth, England: Plymouth Marine Laboratory.Google Scholar
  9. Danulat, E., Muniz, P., García-Alonso, J., & Yannicelli, B. (2002). First assessment of the highly contaminated harbour of Montevideo, Uruguay. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 44, 554–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dauvin, J. C., & Ruellet, T. (2007). Polychaete/amphipod ratio revisited. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55(1–6), 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franz, D. R., & Tanacredi, J. T. (1999). Secondary production of the Amphipoda, Ampelisca abidita mills and its impact in the diet of juvenile winter flounder (Pleuronectes americanus). In Jamaica Bay, N. Estuaries (Vol. 15, pp. 193–203).Google Scholar
  12. Glémarec, M., & Hily, C. (1981). Perturbations apportées à la macrofaune benthique de la baie de Concarneau par les effluents urbains et portuaires. Acta Oecologica Oecologia Applicata, 2, 139–150.Google Scholar
  13. Guerra-García, J., & García-Gómez, J. C. (2004). Polychaete assemblage and sediment pollution in a harbour with two opposing entrances. Helgoland Marine Research, 58, 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harkantra, S. N. (2004). Benthos and demersal fishery resources assessment in the shelf region of Indian coast. In V. S. Somvanshi (Ed.), Large marine ecosystems: Exploration and exploitation for sustainable development and conservation on fish stocks, Fishery survey of India (pp. 54–58).Google Scholar
  15. Hines, A. H., Hadden, A. E., & Weichest, L. A. (1990). Guild structure and foraging impact of blue crabs and epibenthic fish in a sub estuary of Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecological Progress Series, 67, 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holm-Hansen, O. (1978). Chlorophyll a determination: Improvements in methodology. Oikos, 30, 438–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ingole, B. S., Rodrigues, N., & Ansari, Z. A. (2002). Macrobenthic communities of the coastal waters of Dabhol, west coast of India. Indian Journal of Marine Science, 31(2), 93–99.Google Scholar
  18. Ingole, B., Sivadas, S., Goltekar, R., Clemente, S., Nanajkar, M., Sawant, R., et al. (2006). Ecotoxicological effect of grounded MV river princess on the intertidal benthic organisms of Goa. Environment International, 32, 284–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lowe, S., & Thompson, B. (1997). Identifying benthic indicators for San Francisco bay, regional monitoring program, annual report. Oakland, CA: San Francisco Estuary Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Madhupratap, M., Nair, K. N. V., Gopalakrishnan, T. C., Haridas, P., Nair, K. K., Venugopal, P., et al. (2001). Arabian sea oceanography and fisheries of the West Coast of India. Current Science, 81, 355–361.Google Scholar
  21. Nanajkar, M., & Ingole B. S. (2007). Nematode species diversity as indicator of stressed environment along the central west coast of India. In P. V. Desai & R. Roy (Eds.), Diversity and life processes from ocean and land (pp. 42–52).Google Scholar
  22. Pearson, T. H., & Rosenberg, R. (1978). Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology An annual Review, 16, 229–311.Google Scholar
  23. Raman, A. V. (1995). Pollution effects in Visakhapatnam harbour, India: An overview of 23 years of investigation and monitoring. Helgoland Meeresunters, 49, 633–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rhoads, D. C., & Boyer, L. F. (1982). The effects of marine benthos on physical properties of sediments. A successional perspective. In P. L. McCall & M. J. S Tevesz (Eds.), Animal–sediment relations (Vol. 1, pp. 3–52). New York: Plenum Publication Yale.Google Scholar
  25. Rivero, S. M., Elías, R., & Vallariona, E. A. (2005). First survey of macroinfauna in the Mar del Plata Harbour (Argentina), and the use of polychaetes as pollution indicators. Revista de Biologia Marina y Oceanografía, 40(2), 101–108.Google Scholar
  26. Sengupta, R., Naik, S., & Varadachari, V. V. R. (1989). Environmental pollution in coastal areas of India. In P. Bourdeau, J. A. Haines, W. Klein, & C. R. Krishna Murti (Eds.), Ecotoxicology and climate (pp. 235–246). UK: Scope 38 Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Somvanshi, V. S., Varghese, S., & Pillai, N. G. K. (2003). National report on tuna fisheries, research and development in India. In Proceedings of indian ocean tuna commission (pp. 1–8). IOTC-SC-03.Google Scholar
  28. Stull, J. K., Haydock, C. I., Smith, R. W., & Montagne, D. E. (1986). Long-term changes in the benthic community on the coastal shelf of Palos Verdes, Southern California. Marine Biology, 91(4), 539–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vincent, C., Heinrich, H., Edwards, A., Nygaard, K., & Haythornthwaite, J. (2002). Guidance on typology, reference conditions and classifications systems for transitional and coastal waters, CIS working group 2.4 (Coast) Common Implementation Strategy of the water Framework Directive, European Commission.Google Scholar
  30. Warwick, R. M., & Clarke, K. R. (1994). Relearning the ABC: Taxonomic changes and abundance/biomass relationships in disturbed benthic communities. Marine Biology, 118, 739–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Warwick, R. M. (1986). A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities. Marine Biology, 92, 562–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Webber, D. F., & Kelly, K. W. (2003). Characterization of sources of organic pollution to Kingston Harbour, the extent of their influence and some rehabilitation recommendations. Bulletin of Marine Science, 73(2), 257–271.Google Scholar
  33. Wilhm, J. L., & Dorris, T. C. (1966). Species diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates in a stream receiving domestic and oil refinery effluents. American Midland Naturalist, 76, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zingde, M. D. (2002). Degradation of marine habitats and coastal management framework. In Proceedings of the national seminar on creeks, estuaries and mangroves—pollution and conservation, thane (pp. 3–7).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Ingole
    • 1
  • S. Sivadas
    • 1
  • M. Nanajkar
    • 1
  • S. Sautya
    • 1
  • A. Nag
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Oceanography DivisionNational Institute of OceanographyPanajiIndia

Personalised recommendations