Mercury and other metals in eggs and feathers of glaucous-winged gulls (Larus glaucescens) in the Aleutians
- 333 Downloads
Levels of mercury and other contaminants should be lower in birds nesting on isolated oceanic islands and at high latitudes without any local or regional sources of contamination, compared to more urban and industrialized temperate regions. We examined concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese, mercury and selenium in the eggs, and the feathers of fledgling and adult glaucous-winged gulls (Larus glaucescens) nesting in breeding colonies on Adak, Amchitka, and Kiska Islands in the Aleutian Chain of Alaska in the Bering Sea/North Pacific. We tested the following null hypotheses: 1) There were no differences in metal levels among eggs and feathers of adult and fledgling glaucous-winged gulls, 2) There were no differences in metal levels among gulls nesting near the three underground nuclear test sites (Long Shot 1965, Milrow 1969, Cannikin 1971) on Amchitka, 3) There were no differences in metal levels among the three islands, and 4) There were no gender-related differences in metal levels. All four null hypotheses were rejected at the 0.05 level, although there were few differences among the three test sites on Amchitka. Eggs had the lowest levels of cadmium, lead, and mercury, and the feathers of adults had the lowest levels of selenium. Comparing only adults and fledglings, adults had higher levels of cadmium, chromium, lead and mercury, and fledglings had higher levels of arsenic, manganese and selenium. There were few consistent interisland differences, although levels were generally lower for eggs and feathers from gulls on Amchitka compared to the other islands. Arsenic was higher in both adult feathers and eggs from Amchitka compared to Adak, and chromium and lead were higher in adult feathers and eggs from Adak compared to Amchitka. Mercury and arsenic, and chromium and manganese levels were significantly correlated in the feathers of both adult and fledgling gulls. The feathers of males had significantly higher levels of chromium and manganese than did females. The levels of most metals in feathers are below those known to be associated with adverse effects in the gulls or their predators. However, levels of mercury in some gull eggs are within a range suggesting that several eggs should not be eaten in one day by sensitive humans.
KeywordsBirds Gulls Pollutants Heavy metals Mercury Age-related Aleutian Islands
- AFSC (Alaska Fisheries Science Center) (2006). Alaska fisheries; 2003. Available at: wysiwyg://www/afsc/noaa.gov/species/pollock.htm. (Accessed 25 May 2006).
- ATSDR (2004). Public health assessment: Naval Air Facility, Adak. http://www.atsdr.cdc.vog/HAC/PHA/adak/ada_p1.html (accessed January 1, 2006).
- Becker, P. (1992). Egg mercury level decline with the laying sequence in charadriiformes. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 48, 762–767.Google Scholar
- Braune, B. W., Outridge, P. M., Fisk, A. T., Muir, D. C. G., Helm, P. A., Hobbs, K., Hoekstra, P. F., Kuzyk, Z. A., Kwan, M., Letcher, R. J., Lockhart, W. L., Norstrom, R. J., Stern, G. A., & Stirling, I. (2005). Persistent organic pollutants and mercury in marine biota of the Canadian Arctic: an overview of spatial and temporal trends. Science of the Total Environment, 351–352, 4–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burger, J. (1993). Metals in avian feathers: bioindicators of environmental pollution. Reviews in Environmental Toxicology, 5, 203–311.Google Scholar
- Burger, J. (1996). Heavy metal and selenium levels in feathers of Franklin’s gulls in interior North America. Auk, 113, 399–407.Google Scholar
- Burger, J., & Gochfeld, M. (1996b). Family: Laridae (gulls). In J. Del Hoya, A. Elliott, & J. Sargatal (Eds.), Handbook of birds of the world, vol. 3. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.Google Scholar
- Burger, J., & Gochfeld, M. (2002). Effects of chemicals and pollution on seabirds. In E. A. Schreiber, & J. Burger (Eds.), Biology of marine birds (pp. 485–525). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Burger, J., & Gochfeld, M. (2008). Mercury and other metals in feathers of common eider (Somasteria mollissima) and tufted puffins (Fratercula cirrhata) from the Aleutian Chain of Alaska. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (in press).Google Scholar
- Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D., Powers, C. W., Friedlander, B., Eichelberger, J., Barnes, D., Duffy, L. K., Jewett, S. C., & Volz, C. D. (2005). Science, policy, and stakeholders: developing a consensus science plan for Amchitka Island, Aleutians, Alaska. Environmental Management, 35, 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D. S., & Powers, C. W. (2006a). Biomonitoring for ecosystem and human health protection at Amchitka Island. Piscataway, NJ: CRESP.Google Scholar
- Eisler, R. (1985). Cadmium hazards to fish, wildlife and invertebrates: a synoptic review. Washington D.C: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Biological Report 85 (1.2).Google Scholar
- Eisler, R. (1987). Mercury hazards to fish, wildlife and invertebrates: a synoptic review. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Interior, Biological Report 85 (1.10).Google Scholar
- Eisler, R. (1985). Cadmium hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: A synoptic review. Washington DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Rep. 85 (1.2).Google Scholar
- Eisler, R. (1988). Lead hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review. Washington, DC: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2001). Methylmercury fish tissue criterion: Fish tissue criterion for methylmercury to protect human health http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/methylmercury/factsheet.html. Accessed June 10, 2008.
- EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2004). National listing of fish advisories’ Cincinnati, Ohio: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available at http//map1.epa.gov (accessed 30 October 2004).
- Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) (2001). FDA consumer advisory. Available: http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2000/advisory.html. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (accessed 1 December 2001).
- Fish & Wildlife Service (2004). Alaska Subsistence Spring/summer Migratory Bird Harvest. Anchorage, AK: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
- Fitzgerald, W. F. (1989). Atmospheric and oceanic cycling of mercury. In J. P. Riley, & R. Chester (Eds.), Chemical oceanography, vol. 10 (pp. 151–186). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (1994). Mercury in fish: Cause for concern. FDA Consumer Magazine (September). http://www.fda.gov/fdac/reprints/mercury.html. Accessed June 11, 2008.
- Furness, R. W. (1993). Birds as monitors of pollutants. In R. W. Furness, & J. J. D. Greenwood (Eds.), Birds as monitors of environmental change (pp. 86–143). London UK: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- Furness, R. W., & Rainbow, P. S. (1990). Heavy metals in the marine environment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Goede, A. A., & deBruin, M. (1984). The use of bird feather parts as a monitor for metal pollution. Environmental Pollution, 8, 281–289.Google Scholar
- Hamrick, K., & Smith, J. (2003). Subsistence food use in Unalaska and Nikolski. Anchorage, Alaska: Aleutian Pribilof Island Association.Google Scholar
- Houghton, J. T., Callander, B. A., & Varney, S. K. (1992). Climate change 1992. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kenyon, K. W. (1961). Birds of Amchitka Island, Alaska. Auk, 78, 305–326.Google Scholar
- Mailman, R. B. (1980). Heavy metals. In J. J. Perry (Ed.), Introduction to environmental toxicology (pp. 34–43). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Merritt, M. L., & Fuller, R. G. (Eds.), (1977). The environment of Amchitka Island, Alaska. U.S. Report NVO-79, Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Metcheva, R., Yurukova, L., Teodorova, S., & Nikolova, E. (2006). The penguin feathers as bioindicator of Antarctic environmental state. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 362, 259–265.Google Scholar
- NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) (2004). Dutch Harbor — Unalaska, in Alaska, Top U.S Port for landings in 2003. NOAA report 04-096. Available at: www.nmfs.noaa.gov/docs/04-096_top_ports.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2006.
- Patrick, R. (2002). How local Alaska native communities view the Amchitka issue. In Proceedings of the Amchitka Long-term Stewardship Workshop. Fairbanks, AK: CRESP/University of Alaska.Google Scholar
- Peakall, D. B. (1992). Animal biomarkers as pollution indicators. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- Powers, C. W., Burger, J., Kosson, D., Gochfeld, M., & Barnes, D. (2005). Biological and geophysical aspects of potential radionuclide exposure in the Amchitka marine environment. Piscataway, NJ: CRESP.Google Scholar
- SAS (Statistical Analysis System) (1995). SAS users’ guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
- Schiefler, R., Gauthier-Clerc, M., LeBohec, C., Crini, N., Coeurdassier, M., Badot, P.-M., Giraudous, P., & LeMaho, Y. (2005). Mercury concentrations in king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) feathers at Crozet Islands (Sub-Antarctica): temporal trend between 1966–1974 and 2000–2001. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24, 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thompson, D. R., Hamer, K. H., & Furness, R. W. (1991). Mercury accumulation in great skuas Catharacta skuas of known age and sex, and its effects upon breeding and survival. Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 79–84.Google Scholar
- Trapp, J. L. (1979). Variation in summer diet of glaucous-winged gulls in the western Aleutian Islands: an ecological interpretation. Wilson Bulletin, 91, 412–419.Google Scholar
- Verbeek, N. A. M. (1993). Glaucous-winged gull (Larus glaucescens). Birds of North America, 59, 1–20.Google Scholar
- Walsh, P. M. (1990). The use of seabirds as monitors of heavy metals in the marine environment. In R. W. Furness, & P. S. Rainbow (Eds.), Heavy metals in the marine environment (pp. 183–204). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Weber, D. N., & Dingel, W. M. (1997). Alterations in neurobehavioral responses in fishes exposed to lead and lead-chelating agents. American Zoologist, 37, 354–362.Google Scholar
- Wiener, J. G., & Spry, D. J. (1996). Toxicological significance of mercury in freshwater fish. In W. N. Beyer, G. H. Heinz, & A. W. Redmon-Norwood (Eds.),Environmental contaminants in wildlife: interpreting tissue concentrations (pp. 297–339). Boca Raton, FL: SETAC Special Publications, Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar