Monitoring the condition of natural resources in US national parks
- First Online:
- 931 Downloads
The National Park Service has developed a long-term ecological monitoring program for 32 ecoregional networks containing more than 270 parks with significant natural resources. The monitoring program assists park managers in developing a broad-based understanding of the status and trends of park resources as a basis for making decisions and working with other agencies and the public for the long-term protection of park ecosystems. We found that the basic steps involved in planning and designing a long-term ecological monitoring program were the same for a range of ecological systems including coral reefs, deserts, arctic tundra, prairie grasslands, caves, and tropical rainforests. These steps involve (1) clearly defining goals and objectives, (2) compiling and summarizing existing information, (3) developing conceptual models, (4) prioritizing and selecting indicators, (5) developing an overall sampling design, (6) developing monitoring protocols, and (7) establishing data management, analysis, and reporting procedures. The broad-based, scientifically sound information obtained through this systems-based monitoring program will have multiple applications for management decision-making, research, education, and promoting public understanding of park resources. When combined with an effective education program, monitoring results can contribute not only to park issues, but also to larger quality-of-life issues that affect surrounding communities and can contribute significantly to the environmental health of the nation.
KeywordsEcological monitoring Environmental monitoring Monitoring design Indicator National park Protected areas Protocol Sampling design Vital signs
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bailey, R. G. (1998). Ecoregions map of North America: Explanatory note. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. Miscellaneous Publication 1548.Google Scholar
- Bennett, A. J., Thompson, W. L., & Mortenson, D. C. (2006). Vital signs monitoring plan, Southwest Alaska Network. National Park Service. Retrieved 21 Jan 2008 from http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/monitor/monitoringplans.cfm.
- Busch, E. D., & Trexler, J. C. (2003). The importance of monitoring in regional ecosystem initiatives. In E. D. Busch, & J. C. Trexler (Eds.) Monitoring ecosystems: interdisciplinary approaches for evaluating ecoregional initiatives (pp. 1–23). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Davis, G. E. (1989). Design of a long-term ecological monitoring programme for Channel Islands National Park. Natural Areas Journal, 9, 80–89.Google Scholar
- EEA (2003). EUNIS web application. Retrieved 21 Jan 2008 from http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/index.jsp.
- EPA (2002). A Framework for Assessing and Reporting on Ecological Condition: an SAB Report. Environmental Protection Agency, Science Advisory Board. Washington, DC. EPA-SAB-EPEC-02-009.Google Scholar
- Garrett, L. K., Rodhouse, T. J., Dicus, G. H., Caudill, C. C. & Shardlow, M. R. (2007). Upper Columbia Basin Network vital signs monitoring plan. National Park Service, Moscow, ID. Natural Resource Report NPS/UCBN/NRR-2007/002.Google Scholar
- Grossman D. H., Faber-Langendoen, D., Weakley, A. S., Anderson, M., Bourgeron, P., Crawford, R., et al. (1998). International classification of ecological communities: terrestrial vegetation of the United States, vol. I, The national vegetation classification system: Development, status, and applications. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.Google Scholar
- Miller, M. E. (2005). The structure and functioning of dryland ecosystems – Conceptual models to inform long-term ecological monitoring. US Geological Survey, Moab, UT. Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5197.Google Scholar
- National Park System Advisory Board (2001). Rethinking the national parks for the 21st century. National Park Service, Washington, DC. Retrieved 21 Jan 2008 from http://www.nps.gov/policy/report.htm.
- NPS (2006). Management policies 2006. Retrieved 21 Jan 2008 from http://www.nps.gov/policy.
- NPS (2007). Vital signs monitoring. Retrieved 21 Jan 2008 from http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/monitor.
- NPS (2008). Southern Plains Network vital signs monitoring plan. Natural Resource Report NPS/SOPN/NRR-2008/028. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
- NRMP (2007). Natural Resource Monitoring Partnership. Retrieved 21 Jan 2008 from http://nrmp.nbii.gov.
- Oakley, K. L., Thomas, L. P., & Fancy, S. G. (2003). Guidelines for long-term monitoring protocols. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 31, 1000–1003.Google Scholar
- Roman, C. T., & Barrett, N. E. (1999). Conceptual framework for the development of long-term monitoring protocols at Cape Cod National Seashore. US Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Cooperative National Parks Studies Unit, Narragansett, RI.Google Scholar
- Schreuder, H. T., Ernst, R., & Ramirez-Maldonado, H. (2004). Statistical techniques for sampling and monitoring natural resources. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. RMRS-GTR-126.Google Scholar
- Soukup, M. (2007). Integrating science and management: becoming who we thought we were. George Wright Forum, 24, 26–29.Google Scholar
- Woodley, S. J. (1993). Monitoring and measuring ecological integrity in Canadian National Parks. In S. J. Woodley, J. Kay, & G. Francis (Eds.)Ecosystem integrity and the management of ecosystems (pp. 155–176). Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie.Google Scholar