Predicting the biological condition of streams: use of geospatial indicators of natural and anthropogenic characteristics of watersheds
- 251 Downloads
We developed and evaluated empirical models to predict biological condition of wadeable streams in a large portion of the eastern USA, with the ultimate goal of prediction for unsampled basins. Previous work had classified (i.e., altered vs. unaltered) the biological condition of 920 streams based on a biological assessment of macroinvertebrate assemblages. Predictor variables were limited to widely available geospatial data, which included land cover, topography, climate, soils, societal infrastructure, and potential hydrologic modification. We compared the accuracy of predictions of biological condition class based on models with continuous and binary responses. We also evaluated the relative importance of specific groups and individual predictor variables, as well as the relationships between the most important predictors and biological condition. Prediction accuracy and the relative importance of predictor variables were different for two subregions for which models were created. Predictive accuracy in the highlands region improved by including predictors that represented both natural and human activities. Riparian land cover and road-stream intersections were the most important predictors. In contrast, predictive accuracy in the lowlands region was best for models limited to predictors representing natural factors, including basin topography and soil properties. Partial dependence plots revealed complex and nonlinear relationships between specific predictors and the probability of biological alteration. We demonstrate a potential application of the model by predicting biological condition in 552 unsampled basins across an ecoregion in southeastern Wisconsin (USA). Estimates of the likelihood of biological condition of unsampled streams could be a valuable tool for screening large numbers of basins to focus targeted monitoring of potentially unaltered or altered stream segments.
KeywordsBiological assessment Predictive models Random forests Geospatial data Spatial scale
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Carline, R. F., & Walsh, M. C. (2007). Responses to riparian restoration in the spring creek watershed, central Pennsylvania. Restoration Ecology, 15, 731–742.Google Scholar
- Cuffney, T. F., Gurtz, M. E., & Meador, M. R. (1993). Methods for collecting benthic macroinvertebrate samples as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Open File Report 93-406, US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
- Daymet 2006. Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group: University of Montana. Retrieved from www.daymet.org.
- GeoLytics (2001). CensusCD 2000 and StreetCD 2000 CDROM. GeoLytics, Inc., East Brunswick: New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Gilliom, R. J., Alley, W. A., & Gurtz, M. E. (1995). Design of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program: Occurrence and distribution of water-quality conditions. US Geological Survey Circular 1112, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
- Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2001). The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hawkins, C. P., & Carlisle, D. M. (2001). Use of predictive models for assessing the biological integrity of wetlands and other aquatic habitats. In R. B. Rader, D. P. Batzer, & S. A. Wissinger (Eds.), Bioassessment and management of North American wetlands (pp. 59–83). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Heinz Center (2002). The state of the nation’s ecosystems: Measuring the lands, waters, and living resources of the United States. The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment, 1001 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 735 South, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Horizon Systems Corporation (2006). National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) Home: Horizon Systems Corporation. Retrieved August 2006 from http://www.horizon-systems.com/nhdplus/.
- Liaw, A., & Wiener, M. (2002). Classification and regression by random Forest. R News, 2/3, 18–22.Google Scholar
- Moulton, S. R., II, Carter, J. L., Grotheer, S. A., Cuffney, T. F., & Short, T. M. (2000). Methods of analysis by the US Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory: Processing, taxonomy, and quality control of benthic macroinvertebrate samples. Open File Report 00-212, US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
- Moulton, S. R., II, Kennen, J. G., Goldstein, R. M., & Hambrook, J. A. (2002). Revised Protocols for Sampling Algal, Invertebrate, and Fish Communities as Part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Open-file Report 02-150, US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org.
- Ruddy, B. C., Lorenz, D. L., Mueller, D. K. (2006). County-level estimates of nutrient inputs to the land surface of the conterminous United States, 1982–2001: US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5012.Google Scholar
- Svetnik, V., Liaw, A., Tong, C., Culberson, J. C., Sheridan, R. P., & Feuston, B. P. (2003). Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 43, 1947–1958.Google Scholar
- Tate, C. M., Cuffney, T. F., McMahon, G., Giddings, E. M. P., & Zappia, H. (2005). Use of an urban intensity index to assess urban effects on streams in three contrasting environmental settings. In L. R. Brown, R. H. Gray, R. M. Hughes, & M. R. Meador (Eds.), Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems (pp. 291–316). Maryland: American Fisheries Society Symposium 47.Google Scholar
- Urban, D. L. (2002). Classification and regression trees. In B. McCune & J. B. Grace (Eds.), Analysis of ecological communities (pp. 222–232). Oregon: MjM Software Design.Google Scholar
- US Army Corps of Engineers (2006). National Inventory of Dams: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Retrieved July 2006 from http://crunch.tec.army.mil/nidpublic/webpages/nid.cfm.
- US Department of Agriculture (2006). US General Soil Map (STATSGO)|NRCS NCGC. Retrieved from http://www.ncgc.nrcs.usda.gov/products/datasets/statsgo/.
- US Environmental Protection Agency (2000). Mid-Atlantic highlands stream assessment. EPA/903/R-00/015. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- US Environmental Protection Agency (2006a). Draft wadeable streams assessment: A collaborative survey of the Nation’s streams. EPA 841-B-06-002. Office of Water, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- US Environmental Protection Agency (2006b). National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): US Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved June 2006 from http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/.
- US General Accounting Office (GAO) (2002). Water quality: Inconsistent state approaches complicate nation’s efforts to identify its most polluted waters. GAO-02-186. United State General Accounting Office, 441 G. Street NW, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- US Geological Survey (2006a). USGS National Water-Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA). Retrieved from http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/.
- US Geological Survey (2006b). MRLC consortium: National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD). Retrieved from http://www.mrlc.gov/.
- US Geological Survey (2006c). National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Home Page. Retrieved from http://nhd.usgs.gov/.
- US Geological Survey (2006d). National Elevation Dataset (NED). Retrieved from http://ned.usgs.gov.
- US Geological Survey (2007). Grids of agricultural pesticide use in the conterminous United States, 1997: US Geological Survey. Retrieved June 2007 from http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/XML/agpest97grd.xml.
- Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Vølstad, J. H., Roth, N. E., Mercurio, G., Southerland, M. T., & Strebel, D. E. (2003). Using environmental stressor information to predict the ecological status of Maryland non-tidal streams as measured by biological indicators. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 84, 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., Cottingham, P. D., Groffman, P. M., & Morgan, R. P., II (2005). The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24, 706–723.Google Scholar
- Wright, J. F., Sutcliffe, D. W., & Furse, M. T. (Eds.) (2000). Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. United Kingdom: Freshwater Biological Association.Google Scholar