Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 148, Issue 1–4, pp 369–377 | Cite as

The Han River watershed management initiative for the South-to-North Water Transfer project (Middle Route) of China

  • Quanfa Zhang
  • Zhifang Xu
  • Zehao Shen
  • Siyue Li
  • Shusen Wang
Article

Abstract

The South-to-North Water Transfer (SNWT) Project of China is the largest of its kind ever implemented. Of its three routes (i.e., East, Middle and West), the middle one will transfer 14 billion m3 of water annually from the Han River, a tributary of the Yangtze and the water supplying area, to Beijing by 2030. Thus water quality in the 95,000 km2 upper Han River basin is of great concern. A watershed management initiative has been implemented in the basin, and the ultimate objectives are to quantify basin’s ecosystem functioning and to develop an integrated management system with respect to water resources conservation. Specifically, the program includes five activities: characterization of riparian ecosystems, detection of land use and land cover change, quantification of nutrient cycling of representative ecosystems, determination of spatial and temporal variations of water quality, and finally development of a watershed management system for water conservation. This article provides the justifications of the watershed management initiative and the initial results are comprehended with respect to the water conservation in the Han River basin.

Keywords

Interbasin water transfer Watershed management Land cover and land use Riparian zone Chemical properties of stream 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berkoff, J. (2003). China: The South–North Water Transfer project – Is it justified? Water Policy, 3, 1–28.Google Scholar
  2. Bormann, H., Diekkruger, B., & Hauschild, M. (1999). Impacts of landscape management on the hydrological behaviour of small agricultural catchments. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth B, 24, 291–1296.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, J., Gao, X., He, D., & Xia, X. (2000). Nitrogen contamination in the Yangtze River system, China. Journal of Hazardous Materials, A73, 107–113.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, J. R., Gilliam, J. W., Daniels, R. B., & Robarge, W. P. (1987). Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51, 416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox, C., & Madramootoo, C. (1998). Application of geographic information systems in watershed management planning in St. Lucia. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 20, 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dang, H., Jiang, M., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2007). Growth responses of subalpine fir (Abies fargesii) to climate variability in the Qinling Mountain, China. Forest Ecology and Management, 240, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fail, J. L., Haines, B. L., & Todd, R. L. (1986). Riparian forest communities and their role in nutrient conservation in an agricultural watershed. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 2, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greiner, R. (1999). An integrated modeling system for investigating the benefits of catchment management. Environment International, 25, 725–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gu, S., Cheng, X., Shen, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2008). Watershed characteristics of the upper reaches of the Hanjiang River Basin. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin (in press).Google Scholar
  10. Hanson, G. C., Groffman, P. M., & Gold, A. J. (1994). Denitrification in riparian wetlands receiving high and low groundwater nitrate inputs. Journal of Environmental Quality, 23, 917–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Higgitt, D. L., & Lu, X. X. (2001). Sediment delivery to the three gorges 1: Catchment controls. Geomorphology, 41, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hubbard, R. K., & Lowrance, R. R. (1997). Assessment of forest management effects on nitrate removal by riparian buffer systems. Transaction of the ASAE, 40, 383–391.Google Scholar
  13. Hupp, C. R., & Osterkamp, W. R. (1996). Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphic processes. Geomorphology, 14, 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobs, T. J., & Gilliam, J. W. (1985). Riparian losses of nitrate from agricultural drainage waters. Journal of Environmental Quality, 14, 472–478.Google Scholar
  15. Jiang, M., Deng, H., Cai, Q., & Wu, G. (2005). Species richness in a riparian plant community along the banks of the Xiangxi River, the Three Gorges region. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12, 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, K. B., Neale, A. C., Nash, M. S., VanRemortel, R. D., Wickman, J. D., Riitters, K. H., et al. (2001). Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic Region. Landscape Ecology, 16, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuusemets, V., & Mander, U. (2002). Nutrient flows and management of a small watershed. Landscape Ecology, 17(Suppl 1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, S., & Zhang, Q. (2008). Revegetation for the environmental improvement in the Danjiangkou Reservoir – Water supplying area of the Middle Route of the South to North Water Transfer project. China Rural Water and Hydropower (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Li, S., Xu, Z., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2008). Dissolved trace elements and heavy metals in the Danjiangkou Reservoir, China. Environmental Geology (in press), DOI  10.1007/s00254-007-1047-5.
  20. Liu, S. M., Zhang, J., Chen, H. T., Wu, Y., Xiong, H., & Zhang, Z. F. (2003). Nutrients in the Changjiang and its tributaries. Biogeochemistry, 62, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McDonald, M. A., & Healey, J. R. (2000). Nutrient cycling in secondary forests in the Blue Mountains of Jamaica. Forest Ecology and Management, 139, 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McIver, J., & Starr, L. (2001). Restoration of degraded lands in the interior Columbia River basin: Passive vs. active approaches. Forest Ecology and Management, 153, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mellerowicz, K. T., Rees, H. W., Chow, T. L., & Ghanem, I. (1994). Soil conservation planning at the watershed level using the universal soil loss equation with GIS and microcomputer technologies: A case study. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 49, 194–200.Google Scholar
  24. Naiman, R. J., & Decamps, H. (1990). The ecology and management of aquatic–terrestrial ecotones. Paris: Parthenon, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  25. Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Williams, J. R., & King, K. W. (2002). Soil and water assessment tool, TWRI Report TR-191. College Station, TX: Texas Water Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Qureshi, M. E., & Harrison, S. R. (2001). A decision support process to compare riparian vegetation options in Scheu Creek catchment in North Queensland. Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schnitzler, A. (1997). River dynamics as a forest process: Interaction between fluvial systems and alluvial forests in large European river plains. Botanical Review, 63, 40–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shao, X., Wang, H., & Wang, Z. (2003). Interbasin transfer projects and their implications: A China case study. International Journal of River Basin Management, 1, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shen, Z., Zhang, Q., Zhao, J., Hu, Z., Tang, Y., & Lu, N. (2006). The spatial pattern of land use and land cover in the water supplying area of the Middle-Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion (MP-SNWD) Project. Acta Geographica Sinica, 61, 633–644.Google Scholar
  30. USEPA (1998). Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources (BASINS v2.0), EPA-B-98-006. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.Google Scholar
  31. Varis, O., & Vakkilainen, P. (2001). China’s 8 challenges to water resources management in the first quarter of the 21st century. Geomorphology, 41, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vertsessy, R. A., Watson, F. G. R., & O’Sullivan, S. K. (2001). Factors determining relations between stand age and catchment water balance in mountain ash forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 143, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vitousek, P. M. (1994). Beyond global warming: Ecology and global change. Ecology, 75, 1861–1876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wickham, J. D., & Wade, T. G. (2002). Watershed level risk assessment of nitrogen and phosphorus export. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang, S., Zhao, Q., & Belkin, I. M. (2002). Temporal variation in the sediment load of the Yangtze River and the influences of human activities. Journal of Hydrology, 263, 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Young, R., Onstad, C. A., Bosch, D. D., & Anderson, W. P. (1987). AGNPS: Agricultural non-point source pollution model: A watershed analysis tool. USDA – Agricultural Research Service Conservation Research Report 35. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  37. Zhang, Q., Devers, D., Desch, A., Justice, C. O., & Townshend, J. (2005). Mapping tropical deforestation in Central Africa using Landsat TM imageries. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 101, 69–83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quanfa Zhang
    • 1
  • Zhifang Xu
    • 2
  • Zehao Shen
    • 3
  • Siyue Li
    • 1
  • Shusen Wang
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Ecosystem Studies, Wuhan Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Institute of Geology and GeophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of EcologyPeking UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Canada Centre for Remote SensingNatural Resources CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations