Assessment of metals in down feathers of female common eiders and their eggs from the Aleutians: arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese, mercury, and selenium
- 262 Downloads
Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese, mercury and selenium were examined in the down feathers and eggs of female common eiders (Somateria mollissima) from Amchitka and Kiska Islands in the Aleutian Chain of Alaska to determine whether there were (1) differences between levels in feathers and eggs, (2) differences between the two islands, (3) positive correlations between metal levels in females and their eggs, and (4) whether there was more variation within or among clutches. Mean levels in eggs (dry weight) were as follows: arsenic (769 ppb, ng/g), cadmium (1.49 ppb), chromium (414 ppb), lead (306 ppb), manganese (1,470 ppb), mercury (431 ppb) and selenium (1,730 ppb). Levels of arsenic were higher in eggs, while chromium, lead, manganese, and mercury were higher in feathers; there were no differences for selenium. There were no significant interisland differences in female feather levels, except for manganese (eider feathers from Amchitka were four times higher than feathers from Kiska). Levels of manganese in eggs were also higher from Amchitka than Kiska, and eider eggs from Kiska had significantly higher levels of arsenic, but lower levels of selenium. There were no significant correlations between the levels of any metals in down feathers of females and in their eggs. The levels of mercury in eggs were below ecological benchmark levels, and were below human health risk levels. However, Aleuts can seasonally consume several meals of bird eggs a week, suggesting cause for concern for sensitive (pregnant) women.
KeywordsBirds Eiders Pollutants Heavy metals Mercury Feathers Aleutian Islands Arsenic Lead Cadmium Chromium Selenium Manganese
- ATSDR (AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY). (2004). Public health assessment: Naval Air Facility, Adak. http://www.atsdr.cdc.vog/HAC/PHA/adak/ada_p1.html (accessed January 1, 2006).
- Burger, J. (1993). Metals in avian feathers: Bioindicators of environmental pollution. Reviews in Environmental Toxicology, 5, 203–311.Google Scholar
- Burger, J., & Gochfeld, M. (2002). Effects of Chemicals and Pollution on Seabirds. In E. A. Schreiber, & J. Burger (Eds.) Biology of Marine Birds (pp. 485–525). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D. S., & Powers, C. W. (2006a). Biomonitoring for ecosystem and human health protection at Amchitka Island. Piscataway, New Jersey: CRESP.Google Scholar
- Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D., Powers, C. W., Friedlander, B., Eichelberger, J., Barnes, D., Duffy, L. K., Jewett, S. C., & Volz, C. D. (2005). Science, policy, and stakeholders: Developing a consensus science plan for Amchitka Island, Aleutians, Alaska. Environmental Management, 35, 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eisler, R. (1987). Mercury hazards to fish, wildlife and invertebrates: A synoptic review. Washington DC: U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Report 85 (1.10).Google Scholar
- EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (2001). Environmental water quality standard: Freshwater. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WATER/2001/Juanuary/Day-08/w 217.html.
- FDA (Food & Drug Administration). (2005). Answers. http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2005.
- Fimreite, N., Brun, E., Froslie, A., Fredrickson, P., & Gundersen, N. (1974). Mercury in eggs of Norwegian seabirds. Astarte, 1, 71–75.Google Scholar
- Fisk, A. T., deWit, C. A., Wayland, M., Kuzyk, Z. Z., Burgess, N., Letcher, R., Braune, B., Norstrom, R., Blum, S. P., Sandau, C., Lie, E., Larsen, H. J. S., Skaare, J. U., & Muir, D. C. G. (2005). An assessment of the toxicological significance of anthropogenic contaminants in Canadian arctic wildlife. Science of the Total Environment, 351–352, 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fitzgerald, W. F. (1989). Atmospheric and oceanic cycling of mercury. In J. P. Riley, & R. Chester (Eds.) Chemical oceanography, Vol. 10 (pp. 151–186). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Franson, J. C., Hollmen, T., Poppenga, R. H., Hario, M., Kilpi, M., & Smith, M. R. (2000). Selected trace elements and organochlorines: Some findings in blood and eggs of nesting common eiders (Somateria mollissima) from Finland. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19, 1340–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Furness, R. W. (1993). Birds as monitors of pollutants. In R. W. Furness, & J. J. D. Greenwood (Eds.) Birds as monitors of environmental change (pp. 86–143). London, UK: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- Furness, R. W., & Camphuysen, K. C. J. (1997). Seabirds as monitors of the marine environment. Journal of Marine Science, 54, 726–737.Google Scholar
- Furness, R. W., & Rainbow, P. S. (Eds.) (1990). Heavy metals in the marine environment. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Gochfeld, M. (1980). Mercury levels in some seabirds of the Humboldt Current, Peru. Environmental Pollution, A 22, 197–205.Google Scholar
- Goudie, R. I., Robertson, G. J., & Reed, A. (2000). Common eider. Birds of North America, 546, 1–32.Google Scholar
- Kenyon, K. W. (1961). Birds of Amchitka Island, Alaska. Auk, 78, 305–326.Google Scholar
- Mallory, M. L., Braune, B. M., Wayland, M., Gilchrist, H. G., & Dickson, D. L. (2004). Contaminants in common eiders (Somateria mollissima) of the Canadian Arctic. Environmental Research, 12, 197–218.Google Scholar
- Merritt, M. L., & Fuller, R. G. (Eds.) (1977). The environment of Amchitka Island, Alaska. U.S. Washington DC; Report NVO-79, Technical Information Center, Energy Research and Development Administration.Google Scholar
- Mierzykowski, S. E., Welch, L. J., Goodale, W., Evers, D. C., Hall, C. S., Kress, S. W., & Allen, R. B. (2005). Mercury in bird eggs from coastal Maine. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service; project report FY05-MEFO-1-EC.Google Scholar
- Ohlendorf, H. M., Risebrough, R. W., & Vermeer, K. (1978). Exposure of marine birds to environmental pollutants. US Fish.& Wildl. Serv. Wildl. Res. Rep., 9.Google Scholar
- Peakall, D. B. (1992). Animal biomarkers as pollution indicators. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- Pearce, P. A., Peakall, D. B., & Reynolds, L. M. (1979). Shell thinning and residues of organochlorines and mercury in seabird eggs, Eastern Canada, 1970–1076. Pesticides Monitoring Journal, 13, 61–58.Google Scholar
- Powers, C. W., Burger, J., Kosson, D., Gochfeld, M., & Barnes, D. (Eds.) (2005). Biological and geophysical aspects of potential radionuclide exposure in the Amchitka marine environment. Piscataway, New Jersey: CRESP.Google Scholar
- SAS (1995). SAS users’ guide. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
- Walsh, P. M. (1990). The use of seabirds as monitors of heavy metals in the marine environment. In R. W. Furness, & P. S. Rainbow (Eds.) Heavy metals in the marine environment (pp. 183–204). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (WHO). (1990). IPCS-Methylmercury. Environmental Health Criteria, 101. Geneva.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (WHO). (1991). IPCS-Inorganicmercury. Environmental Health Criteria, 118. Geneva.Google Scholar