Factors affecting river health and its assessment over broad geographic ranges: The Western Australian experience
- First Online:
- 208 Downloads
AusRivAS is an Australia-wide program that measures river condition using predictive models to compare the macroinvertebrate families occurring at a river site with those expected if the site were in natural condition. Results of assessment of 685 sites across all major rivers in Western Australia are presented. Most rivers were in relatively natural condition in the northern half of the state where the human population is low and pastoralism is the major land use. In the south, where the human population is higher and agriculture is more intensive, rivers were mostly more disturbed. AusRivAS assessment produced some erroneous results in rivers of the south-west cropping zone because of the lack of appropriate reference site groups and biased distribution of sampling sites. Collecting low numbers of animals from many forested streams, because of low stream productivity and samples that were difficult to sort, also affected assessments. Overall, however, AusRivAs assessment identified catchment processes that were inimical to river health. These processes included salinisation, high nutrient and organic loads, erosion and loss of riparian vegetation. River regulation, channel modification and fire were also associated with river degradation. As is the case with other assessment methods, one-off sampling at individual sites using AusRivAS may be misleading. Seasonal drought, in particular, may make it difficult to relate conditions at the time of sampling to longer-term river health. AusRivAS has shown river condition in Western Australia is not markedly different from other parts of Australia which, as a whole, lacks the substantial segments of severely degraded river systems reported in England.
KeywordsAusRivAS Macroinvertebrates Salinisation Environmental impacts Temporal variability Sample size
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anonymous (1984). Streamflow records of Western Australia to 1982. 3 vols. Perth, Western Australia: Public Works Department.Google Scholar
- Borg, H., Hordacre, A., & Batini, F. (1988). Effects of logging in stream and river buffers on watercourses and water quality in the southern forest of Western Australia. Australian Forestry, 51, 98’05.Google Scholar
- Bunn, S. E., & Davies, P. M. (1990). Why is the stream fauna of south-western Australia so impoverished? Hydrobiologia, 194, 169’76.Google Scholar
- Davies, P. E. (2000). Development of a national river bioassessment system (AusRivAS) in Australia. In J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe, & M. T. Furse (Eds.), Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters (pp. 113’24). Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association.Google Scholar
- Gentilli, J. (1971). The main climatological elements. In J. Gentilli (Ed.), World survey of climatology, vol. 13: Climates of Australia and New Zealand (pp. 119’88). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Halse, S. A., & Blyth, J. D. (1992). Aquatic fauna of the Karri Forest. In Research on the impact of forest management in South-west Western Australia (pp. 115’38). Occasional Paper 2/1992. Perth, Western Australia: Department of Conservation and Land Management.Google Scholar
- Halse, S., Smith, M., Kay, W., Scanlon, M., & Cocking, J. (2002a). Australia-wide Assessment of River Health: Western Australian AusRivAS Sampling and Processing Manual. Monitoring River Health Initiative Technical Report 18. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Commonwealth of Australia http://www.deh.gov.au/water/rivers/nrhp/manual-wa/pubs/manual-wa.pdf.
- Halse, S. A., Scanlon, M. D., & Cocking, J. S. (2002b). Australia-wide Assessment of River Health: Western Australian Bioassessment Report (WA Final Report). Monitoring River Health Technical Report 7. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Commonwealth of Australia http://www.deh.gov.au/water/rivers/nrhp/wa/pubs/wa.pdf.
- Hemsley-Flint, B. (2000). Classification of the biological quality of rivers in England and Wales. In J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe, & M. T. Furse (Eds.), Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques (pp. 55’9). Ambleside, UK: Freshwater Biological Association.Google Scholar
- Humphrey, C. L., Storey, A. W., & Thurtell, L. (2000). AUSRIVAS: Operator sample processing errors and temporal variability ’implications for model sensitivity. In J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe, & M. T. Furse (Eds.), Assessing the biological quality of freshwaters. RIVPACS and similar techniques (pp. 143’63). Ambleside, UK: Freshwater Biological Association.Google Scholar
- Kelly, P. C. (1995). Western Australian year book 1995. Perth, Western Australia: Australian Government.Google Scholar
- NLWRA (2002). Australian catchment, river and estuary assessment. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Land & Water Australia.Google Scholar
- Norris, R. H., & Georges, A. (1986). Design and analysis for assessment of water quality. In P. De Deckker & W. D. Williams (Eds.), Limnology in Australia (pp. 554’72). Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
- Pinder, A. M., Halse, S. A., McRae, J. M., & Shiel, R. J. (2004). Aquatic invertebrate assemblages of wetlands and rivers in the Wheatbelt region of Western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum. Supplements, 67, 7’7.Google Scholar
- Reynoldson, T. B., & Wright, J. F. (2000). The reference condition: Problems and solutions. In J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe, & M. T. Furse (Eds.), Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques (pp. 305’09). Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association.Google Scholar
- Schofield, N. J., & Davies, P. E. (1996). Measuring the health of our rivers. Water, May/June, 39’3.Google Scholar
- Scrimgeour, G. J., Davidson, R. J., & Davidson, J. M. (1988). Recovery of benthic macroinvertebrate and epilithic communities following a large flood in an unstable, braided, New Zealand river. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Resources, 22, 337’44.Google Scholar
- Simpson, J. C., & Norris, R. H. (2000). Biological assessment of river quality: Development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe, & M. T. Furse (Eds.), Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques (pp. 125’42). Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association.Google Scholar
- Thackway, R., & Cresswell, I. D. (Eds.) (1995). An interim biogeographic regionalisation for Australia: A framework for establishing the national system of reserves, version 4.0. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Australian Nature Conservation Agency.Google Scholar
- Turak, E., Hose, G., & Waddell, N. (2002). Australia-wide Assessment of River Health: New South Wales Bioassessment Report. Monitoring River Health Initiative Technical Report 2a. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Commonwealth of Australia http://www.deh.gov.au/water/rivers/nrhp/nsw/pubs/nsw1.pdf.
- WRC (1997). The state of the northern rivers. Perth, Western Australia: Water and Rivers Commission.Google Scholar
- Wright, J. F. (2000). An introduction to RIVPACS. In J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe, & M. T. Furse (Eds.), Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters (pp. 1’4). Ambleside, UK: Freshwater Biological Association.Google Scholar