Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 146, Issue 1–3, pp 235–242 | Cite as

Accumulation of Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) at different depths clay and loamy sand textural soils due to tobacco waste application

  • Coşkun Gülser
  • Nazlı Kutluk Yılmaz
  • Feride Candemir
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The effects of tobacco waste (TW) application to the soil surface on the accumulation of Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) in clay and loamy sand textural soils at various depths were investigated in two different fields. The tobacco waste had been found to be infected with TMV. Eighteen months after TW application to the soil surface, soils were sampled at 20 cm intervals through to 80 cm depth. The DAS-ELISA method was performed to determine infection of soil with TMV. The viruses persisted in clay soil for a long period compared with loamy sand soil. There was no accumulation of TMV at any depth of loamy sand soil in Experimental Field 2. TMV adsorption to soil particles in 0–60 cm depth of clay soil was determined in all TW treatments in Experimental Field 1. The highest ELISA Absorbance (A405) values in all treatments were determined in the 20–40 cm soil depth that had the highest clay content. ELISA A405 values of TMV at different depths of clay soil gave significant correlations with clay content (r = 0.793**), EC values (r = 0.421**) and soil pH (r = −0.405**). Adsorption of TMV to net negatively charged clay particle surfaces increased with increasing EC values of soil solution. Decreasing soil pH and infiltration rate increased adsorption of TMV to clay particles. Higher infiltration rate and lower clay content in loamy sand soil caused leaching of TMV from the soil profile.

Keywords

TMV Tobacco waste Soil depth Soil texture Adsorption 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrios, G. N. (1988). Plant pathology. Virus diseases of tobacco. Third Edition. Academic, (pp. 803).Google Scholar
  2. Allen, W. R. (1981). Dissemination of tobacco mosaic virus from soil to plant leaves under glasshouse conditions. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 3, 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, W. R. (1984). Mode of inactivation of TMV in soil under dehydrating conditions. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 6, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arif, M., Torrance, L., & Reavy, B. (1994). Improved efficiency of detection of potato mop-top furovirus in potato tubers and the roots and leaves of soil-bait plants. Potato Research, 37, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arli-Sökmen, M., Barker, H., & Torrance, L. (1998). Factors affecting the detection of potato mop-top virus in potato tubers and improvement of test procedures for more reliable assays. Annals of Applied Biology, 133, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bitton, G., Pancorbo, O. C., Overman, A. R., & Gifford, G. E. (1978). Retention of viruses during sludge application to soils. Progress in Water Technology, 25, 2088–2095.Google Scholar
  7. Blake, G. R. (1965). Bulk density. In C. A. Black (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Agronomy no.9 (pp. 381–389). Part I Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  8. Broadbent, L. (1976). Epidemiology and control of tomato mosaic virus. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 14, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlson, G. F., Woodard, F. E., Wentworth, D. F., & Sproul, O. J. (1968). Virus inactivation on clay particles in natural waters. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 40, R98–R106.Google Scholar
  10. Cheo, P. C. (1980). Antiviral factors in soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheo, P. C., & Nikoloff, J. A. (1980). The priming effect on rate of tobacco mosaic virus degredation in soil columns. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 883–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chu, Y., Jin, Y., Baumann, T., & Yates, M. V. (2003). Effect of soil properties on saturated and unsaturated virus transport through columns. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 2017–2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, M. F., & Adams, A. N. (1977). Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology, 34, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Day, P. R. (1965). Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. In C. A. Black (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Agronomy no.9 (pp. 545–567). Part I Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  15. De Neve, S., & Hofman, G. (2000). Influence of soil compaction on carbon and nitrogen mineralization of soil organic matter and crop residues. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30, 544–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erkan, S. (1987). Investigations on the stability of Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV) in soil. Journal of Turkish. Phytopathology, 16(3), 119–130.Google Scholar
  17. Fillhart, R. C., Bachand, G. D., & Castello, J. D. (1998). Detection of infectious tobamoviruses in forest soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64(4), 1430–1435.Google Scholar
  18. Gerba, C. P., Wallis, C., & Melnick, J. L. (1975). Fate of wastewater bacteria and viruses in soil. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE, 101, 157–174.Google Scholar
  19. Gilbert, R. G., Gerba, C. P., Rice, R. C., Bouwer, C., Wallis, C., & Melnick, J. L. (1976). Virus and bacteria removal from wastewaterby land treatment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 32, 333–338.Google Scholar
  20. Goyal, S. M., & Gerba, C. P. (1979). Comparative adsorption of human enteroviruses, simian rotavirus, and selected bacteriophages to soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 38(2), 241–247.Google Scholar
  21. Hillel, D. (1982). Introduction to Soil Physics. Academic, 14–28 Oval Road, London.Google Scholar
  22. Ikegashira, Y., Ohki, T., Ichiki, U. T., Higashi, T., Hagiwara, K., & Omura, T. (2004). An immunological system for the detection of Pepper mild mottle virus in soil from green pepper fields. Plant Disease, 88, 650–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kacar, B. (1994). Chemical analysis of plant and soil III. Soil analysis,.Ankara Univ. Fac. of Agric. No:3, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
  24. Kegler, H. E., Fuchs, D., Spaar, D., & Kegler, J. (1995). Viren im Boden und Grundwasser (Übersichtsbeitrag). Archiv fuÉr Phytopathologie und Pflanzenschutz, 29, 349–371.Google Scholar
  25. Komuro, Y., & Iwaki, M. (1969). Presence of tobacco mosaic virus in roots of field-grown tomato plants healthy in appearance. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 35, 294–298.Google Scholar
  26. Lamer, J. M., McGuire, J. M., & Goode, M. J. (1982). Persistence of tomato mosaic virus in tomato debris and soil under field conditions. Plant Disease, 66, 552–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lance, J. C., & Gerba, C. P. (1984). Virus movement in soil during saturated and unsaturated flow. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 47, 335–337.Google Scholar
  28. Lipson, S. M., & Stotzky, G. (1983). Adsorption of reoviruses to clay minerals: Effects of cation exchange capacity, cation saturation, and surface area. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 46, 673–682.Google Scholar
  29. Lipson, S. M., & Stotzky, G. (1987). Interactions between viruses and clay minerals. In V. C. Rao, & L. M. Melnick (Eds.) Human viruses in sediments, sludges and soils (pp. 197–230). Boca Raton, Fla: CRC.Google Scholar
  30. Madejon, E., Lopez, R., Murillo, J. M., & Cabrera, F. (2001). Agricultural use of three (sugar-beet) vinasse composts: Effect on crops and chemical properties of a Cambisol soil in the Guadalquivir river valley (SW Spain). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 84, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore, R. S., Taylor, D. H., Reddy, M. M., & Sturman, L. S. (1982). Adsorption of reovirus by minerals and soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 44, 852–859.Google Scholar
  32. Ozgüven, M., Kaya, Z., Yılmaz, M. A., Kırıcı, S., & Tansı, S. (1999). Sigara fabrikası atıklarının gübre olarak değerlendirilmesi. Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry, 23(1), 43–51.Google Scholar
  33. Powelson, D. K., & Gerba, C. P. (1994). Virus removal from sewage effluents during saturated and unsaturated flow through soil columns. Water Research, 28, 2175–2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rao, V. C., & Melnick, J. L. (1986). Environmental virology. American Society for Microbiology. Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  35. Schaub, S. A., & Sagik, B. P. (1975). Association of enteroviruses with natural and artificially introduced coloidal solids in water and infectivity of solids-associated virions. Applied Microbiology, 30, 212–222.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, P. R., Campbell, R. N., & Fry, P. R. (1969). Root discharge and soil survival of viruses. Phytopathology, 59, 1678–1687.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, J., & Doran, J. W. (1996). Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analysis. In: J. W. Doran, & A. J. Jones (Eds), Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Spec. Publication 49. SSSA, Madison, WI, (pp. 169–185).Google Scholar
  38. Sobsey, M. D., Dean, C. H., Knuckles, M. E., & Wagner, R. A. (1980). Interactions and survival of enteric viruses in soil materials. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 40, 92–101.Google Scholar
  39. Sobsey, M. D., & Shields, P. A. (1987). Survival and transport of viruses in soils: Model studies. In V. C. Rao, & L. M. Melnick (Eds.) Human viruses in sediments, sludges and soils (pp. 155–177). Boca Raton, Fla: CRC.Google Scholar
  40. Soil Quality Ins. Staff. (1999). Soil Quality Test Kit Guide. Agric. Res. Serv., Natural Resource Cons. Serv., Soil Quality Inst., USDA.Google Scholar
  41. Soil Survey Staff. (1993). Soil Survey Manuel. USDA Handbook No:18 Washington.Google Scholar
  42. Tan, S. H., Nishiguchi, M., Sakamoto, W., Ogura, Y., Murata, M., Ugaki, M., et al. (1997). Molecular analysis of the genome of an attenuated strain of cucumber green mottle mosaic virus. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 63, 470–474.Google Scholar
  43. Tejada, M., & Gonzalez, J. L. (2004). Effects of application of a byproduct of the two-step olive oil mill process on maize yield. Agronomy Journal, 69, 692–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vaughn, J. M., & Laundry, E. F. (1983). Viruses in soils and groundwaters. In G. Berg (Ed.) Viral pollution of environment (pp. 163–210). Boca Raton, Fla.: CRS.Google Scholar
  45. Vaughn, J. M., & Sobsey, M. D. (1983). Method for recovery of enteric viruses from estuarine sediments with chaotrophic agents. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 46, 379–385.Google Scholar
  46. Yoneyama, S. (1988a). Control of P strain of tobacco mosaic virus in sweet pepper. (2) Effects of soil fumigation with methyl bromide in spring season. Proc, Kanto Plant Prot., 35, 53–55.Google Scholar
  47. Yoneyama, S. (1988b). Control of P strain of tobacco mosaic virus in sweet pepper. (3) Effects of soil fumigation with methyl bromide in summer season. Proc. Kanto Plant Prot., 35, 56–57.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Coşkun Gülser
    • 1
  • Nazlı Kutluk Yılmaz
    • 2
  • Feride Candemir
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Agriculture, Soil Science DepartmentOndokuz Mayis UniversitySamsunTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Agriculture, Plant Protection DepartmentOndokuz Mayis UniversitySamsunTurkey

Personalised recommendations