Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 131, Issue 1–3, pp 201–210 | Cite as

Air Quality Survey Carried Out by Schoolchildren: An Innovative Tool for Urban Planning

  • Cristina Nali
  • Giacomo Lorenzini
Article

Abstract

An educational project on biological monitoring of air quality was launched in 2004 to involve about 650 young students (age 6 to 16) from 21 schools of nine municipalities in Tuscany (Central Italy) in active detection of the crucial pollutant ozone with indicator sensitive tobacco seedlings. Results implied the reading of 9,300 raw biological figures and were fortified by the data captured by six photometric analysers. Under the guidance of their teachers, the students had several opportunities to practice with many basic and applied study areas and were initiated into the scientific method in a simple and absorbing manner. Curiosity and involvement were widespread; a sort of emotional and responsible relationship was developed by several pupils. Though primarily an educational exercise, the survey introduced a research element and the regional picture of air pollution that emerged has increased our knowledge of the air quality situation in the area. Biological monitoring of air quality is a powerful tool to improve the awareness and involvement in key topics of environmental education. In addition, it represents a crucial element for improving the awareness of problems and implies the active participation of citizens in the assessment of several indicators of the state of the environment. Its potential as a robust implement in landscape and urban planning is noteworthy.

Keywords

Air pollution Biomonitoring Environmental education Environmental quality Indicator plants Ozone Tobacco 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ANPA (Italian Agency for Environmental Protection, Rome) (1999). In C. Piccini & S. Salvati (Eds.), Biomonitoraggio della qualità dell’aria sul territorio nazionale. Rome: Agenzia Nazionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente.Google Scholar
  2. Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont, R., Hamilton, R. S., Machin, N., Perks, J., & Williams, I. D. (1999). Social awareness of air quality information. Science of the Total Environment, 235, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brimblecombe, P., (2003). The effects of air pollution on the built environment. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brimblecombe, P. & Maynard, R. L. (2001). The urban atmosphere and its effects. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burchett, M. D. (1995). Horticultural aspects of environmental issues in urbanized society: The gardens as a model for caring the earth. Acta Horticulturae, 391, 77–88.Google Scholar
  7. Castell, J.-F., & Maronnier, D. (2002). Biomonitoring of ozone: A tool to initiate the young people into the scientific method and air pollution impacts. In A. Klumpp, A. Fomin, G. Klumpp, & W. Ansel (Eds), Bioindication and air quality in European cities (pp. 265–269). Stuttgard: Heimach.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colbeck, I., & MacKenzie, A. R. (1994). Air pollution by photochemical oxidants. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. Emberson, L., Ashmore, M., & Murray, F. (2003). Air pollution impacts on crops and forests. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Heggestad, H. E. (1991). Origin of Bel-W3, Bel-B tobacco varieties and their use as indicator of ozone. Acta Horticulturae, 74, 264–291.Google Scholar
  12. Landis, J. R., & Koch G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lorenzini, G. (1994). A miniaturized kit for ozone biomonitoring. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 48, 1–4.Google Scholar
  14. Lorenzini, G., & Nali, C. (2004). Bio-monitoring of ozone by young students. Journal of Biological Education, 38, 158–162.Google Scholar
  15. Lorenzini, G., Nali, C., Dota, M. R., & Martorana, F. (2000). Visual assessment of foliar injury induced by ozone on indicator tobacco plants: A data quality evaluation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 62, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nali, C., Catoni, C., & Lorenzini, G. (2006). A case study of environmental education: Biomonitoring of ozone with young students. Proceedings of 3rd World Environmental Education Congress, Torino, Italy, 2–6 October 2005.Google Scholar
  17. Nali, C., Ferretti, M., Pellegrini, M., & Lorenzini, G. (2001). Monitoring and biomonitoring of surface ozone in Florence, Italy. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 69, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nali, C., Pucciariello, C., & Lorenzini, G. (2002a). Mapping ozone critical levels for vegetation in Central Italy. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 141, 337–347.Google Scholar
  19. Nali, C., Pucciariello, C., & Lorenzini, G. (2002b). Ozone distribution in central Italy and its effect on crop productivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 90, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olea, R. A. (1974). Optimal contour mapping techniques using universal kriging. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 79, 695–702.Google Scholar
  21. Posthumus, A. C. (1982). Biological indicators of air pollution. In M. H. Unsworth & d. P. Ormrod (Eds), Effects of gaseous air pollution in agriculture and horticulture (pp. 27–42). London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  22. Saitanis, C. J. (2003). Background ozone monitoring and phytodetection in the greater rural area of Corinth-Greece. Chemosphere, 51, 913–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saitanis, C. J., & Karandinos, M. G. (2001). Instrumental recording and biomonitoring of ambient ozone in Greek countryside. Chemosphere, 44, 813–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saitanis, C. J., Katsaras, D. H., Riga-Karandinos, A. N., Lekkas, D. B., & Arapis, G. (2004). Evaluation of ozone phytotoxicity in the greater area of a typical Mediterranean small city (Volos) and in the nearby forest (Pelion Mt.)-Central Greece. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 72, 1268–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toncelli, M. L., & Lorenzini, G. (1999). Comparative evaluation of biomonitoring techniques of tropospheric ozone. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 55, 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tonneijck, A. E. G., & Posthumus, A. C. (1987). Use of indicator plants for biological monitoring of effects of air pollution: The Dutch approach. VDI-Berichte, 609, 205–216.Google Scholar
  27. WHO (World Health Organization) (1999). Health costs due to road traffic-related air pollution. Copenhagen: WHO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Coltivazione e Difesa delle Specie Legnose “Giovanni Scaramuzzi”University of PisaPisaItaly
  2. 2.Leonardo-Istituto di Ricerca sul Territorio e l’AmbientePisaItaly

Personalised recommendations