Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 126, Issue 1–3, pp 117–127

Mercury and Growth of Tree Swallows at Acadia National Park, and at Orono, Maine, USA

  • Jerry R. Longcore
  • Reza Dineli
  • Terry A. Haines
Original Article


In 1997 and 1998 we weighed nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) and measured selected body components at two colonies: Acadia National Park on Mt. Desert Island, and at Orono, ME. We used differences in mean growth variables among individual nestlings to evaluate differences between colonies, years, and amount of total mercury (THg) in carcasses and methyl mercury (MeHg) in feathers. We marked nestlings on the day hatched and measured body components every day in 1997 and every other day in 1998 until nestlings fledged. We calculated linear growth rates and asymptotic means as appropriate. In 1998, linear growth rate of weight was higher at Acadia than at Orono, but not different in 1997. We detected no mean differences in asymptotic mean weight of nestlings between colonies or years. In 1997, mean linear growth rates of the wing (chord), tail, tarsus, and mandible were higher at Acadia than at Orono. The amount of MeHg in feathers was associated with a lower linear growth rate of weight during early age (2–10 days), but asymptotic mean weight during days 11–16 was not different. No effect on linear growth of tail feathers or wing was associated with the amount of MeHg in feathers or THg in carcasses. Fledgling tree swallows that survive to migrate, however, will leave Maine with substantial concentrations of Hg in their tissues.


Acadia National Park Asymptotic mean Linear growth rate Maine Mercury Methyl mercury Orono Tree swallow Tachycineta bicolor 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beyer, W. N., Spalding, M., & Morrison, D. (1997). Mercury concentrations in feathers of wading birds from Florida. Ambio, 26, 97–100.Google Scholar
  2. Blancher, P. J., & McNicol, D. K. (1988). Breeding biology of tree swallows in relation to wetland acidity. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66, 842–849.Google Scholar
  3. Blancher, P. J., & McNicol, D. K. (1991). Tree swallow diet in relation to wetland acidity. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 2629–2637.Google Scholar
  4. Bluebird Association of Maine. (1995). Ohio Bluebird Society offers suggestions for bluebird house construction. Downeast Bluebird, 6, 7.Google Scholar
  5. Boag, P. T. (1987). Effects of nesting diet on growth and adult size of zebra finches (Poephila guttata). Auk, 104, 155–166.Google Scholar
  6. Boag, P. T., & van Noordwijk, A. J. (1987). Quantitative genetics. In F. Cooke & P. A. Buckley (Eds.), Avian genetics – A population and ecological approach (pp. 45–78). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Borg, K., Erne, K., Hanko, E., & Wanntorp, H. (1970). Experimental secondary methyl mercury poisoning in goshawk (Accipiter g. gentillis L.). Environmental Pollution, 1, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brisbin, I. L., Jr., Collins, C. T., White, G. C., & McCallum, D. A. (1987). A new paradigm for the analysis and interpretation of growth data: The shape of things to come. Auk, 104, 552–554.Google Scholar
  9. Bryant, D. M. (1978). Environmental influences on growth and survival of nesting house martins Delichon urbica. Ibis, 120, 271–283.Google Scholar
  10. Burger, J., Rodgers, J. A., Jr., & Gochfeld, M. (1993). Heavy metal and selenium levels in endangered wood storks Mycteria americana from nesting colonies in Florida and Costa Rica. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 24, 417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler, R. W. (1988). Population dynamics and migration routes of tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor, in North America. Journal of Field Ornithology, 59, 395–402.Google Scholar
  12. Crewther, W. G., Fraser, R. D. B., Lennox, F. G., & Lindley, H. (1965). The Chemistry of keratins. Advanced Protein Chemistry, 20, 191–303.Google Scholar
  13. Gerrard, P. M., & St. Louis, V. L. (2001). The effects of experimental reservoir creation on the bioaccumulation of methylmercury and reproductive success of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Environmental Science and Technology, 35, 1329–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heinz, G. (1974). Effects of low dietary levels of methyl mercury on mallard reproduction. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 11, 386–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinz, G. H. (1975). Effects of methylmercury on approach and avoidance behavior of mallard ducklings. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 13, 554–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heinz, G. H. (1979). Methylmercury: Reproductive and behavioral effects on three generations of mallard ducks. Journal of Wildlife Management, 43, 394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heinz, G. H. (1996). Mercury poisoning in wildlife. In A. Fairbrother, L. N. Locke, & G. L. Hoff (Eds.), Noninfectious Diseases of Wildlife 2nd Edition (pp. 118–127). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, M. E., & Lombardo, M. P. (2000). Nesting tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) diets in an upland old field in western Michigan. American Midland Naturalist, 144, 216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kahl, J. S. (1996). Lake Chemistry at Acadia National Park, 1995, Report to Acadia National Park (pp. 1–14). Orono: Water Research Institute, University of Maine.Google Scholar
  20. Kahl, J. S., Nelson, S., Fernandez, I., Haines, T., Norton, S., Wiersma, G. B., et al. (2005). Streamwater chemistry integrates landscape factors in a paired watershed study at Acadia National Park, Maine, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, this volume.Google Scholar
  21. Kuerzi, R. G. (1941). Life history studies of the tree swallow. Proceedings of the Linnean Society, 52–53, 1–52.Google Scholar
  22. Longcore, J. R., Haines, T. A., & Halteman, W. A. (2005). Mercury in tree swallow food, eggs, bodies, and feathers at Acadia National Park, Maine, and an EPA Superfund site, Ayer, Massachusetts. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, this volume.Google Scholar
  23. McCarty, J. P. (2001). Variation in growth of nestling tree swallows across multiple temporal and spatial scales. Auk, 118, 176–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCarty, J. P., & Secord, A. L. (1999). Reproductive ecology of Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) with high levels of polychlorinated biphenyl contamination. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18, 1433–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCarty, J. P., & Winkler, D. W. (1999). Relative importance of environmental variables in determining the growth of nestling Tree Swallows Tachycineta bicolor. Ibis, 141, 286–296.Google Scholar
  26. Nisbet, I. C. T., Spendelow, J. R., & Hatfield, J. S. (1995). Variations in growth of roseate tern chicks. Condor, 97, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nocera, J. J., & Taylor, P. D. (1998). In situ behavioral response of common loons associated with elevated mercury (Hg) exposure. Conservation Ecology, 2, 1–7. URL:http://www.consecol.org/vol2/iss2/art10.
  28. Pass, D. A., Little, P. B., & Karstad, L. H. (1975). The pathology of subacute and chronic methyl mercury poisoning of the mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos). Journal of Comparative Pathology, 85, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paynter, R. A., Jr. (1954). Interrelations between clutch-size, brood-size, prefledging survival, and weight in Kent Island tree swallows (continued). Bird-banding, 25, 35–38, 102–110, 136–148.Google Scholar
  30. Quinney, T. E., & Ankney, C. D. (1985). Prey size selection by tree swallows. Auk, 102, 245–250.Google Scholar
  31. Quinney, T. E., Hussell, D. J. T., & Ankney, C. D. (1986). Sources of variation in growth of tree swallows. Auk, 103, 389–400.Google Scholar
  32. Ricklefs, R. E. (1967). A graphical method of fitting equations to growth curves. Ecology, 48, 978–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ricklefs, R. E. (1968). Weight recession in nestling birds. Auk, 85, 30–35.Google Scholar
  34. Ricklefs, R. E., & Peters, S. (1979). Intraspecific variation in the growth rate of nestling European Starlings. Bird-Banding, 50, 338–348.Google Scholar
  35. Robertson, R. J., Stutchbury, B. J., & Cohen, R. R. (1992). Tree swallow. In A. Poole, P. Stettenheim, & F. Gill (Eds.), The Birds of North America, No. 11. Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences; Washington, District of Columbia: The American Ornithologists' Union.Google Scholar
  36. SAS Institute. (1990). SAS procedures guide, version 6, 3rd edition. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  37. Scheuhammer, A. M. (1987). The chronic toxicity of aluminum, cadmium, mercury, and lead in birds: A review. Environmental Pollution, 46, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. St. Louis, V. L., & Barlow, J. C. (1993). The reproductive success of tree swallows nesting near experimentally acidified lakes in northwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71, 1090–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. St. Louis, V. L., Barlow, J. C., & Sweerts, J-P. R. A. (1989). Toenail-clipping: A simple technique for marking individual nidicolous chicks. Journal of Field Ornithology, 60, 211–215.Google Scholar
  40. White, G. C., & Brisbin, I. L., Jr. (1980). Estimation and comparison of parameters in stochastic growth models for barn owls. Growth, 44, 97–111.Google Scholar
  41. Zach, R., & Mayoh, K. R. (1982). Weight and feather growth of nestling tree swallows. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 60, 1080–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerry R. Longcore
    • 1
  • Reza Dineli
    • 2
  • Terry A. Haines
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyPatuxent Wildlife Research CenterOronoUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyPatuxent Wildlife Research CenterLaurelUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Geological Survey, Orono Field StationLeetown Science CenterOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations