Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 128, Issue 1–3, pp 183–194 | Cite as

Assessment of the potential of the rock gunnel (Pholis gunnellus) along the Atlantic coast of Canada as a species for monitoring the reproductive impacts of contaminant exposures

Original Article


Evaluating the impacts of point source discharges on fish species in estuarine environments can be challenging because of a paucity of resident species. We evaluated the biology of rock gunnel (Pholis gunnellus) at three relatively uncontaminated sites in the Bay of Fundy, along the Atlantic coast of Canada. Rock gunnel are seasonally resident (April to November) in tide pools, but little was known about their life history in Atlantic Canada or their potential for use for monitoring environmental quality. Fish were collected between April and November, and ranged from 2.46 g--15.2~g in weight and 97 mm-170 mm in length, with a maximum age of 7 years. Both males and females were similar in size, and both reached sexual maturity at a size of 5.5 g. Organ weights and condition indices of fish were stable from spring when they returned from offshore (April to May) until late summer (August to September), but fall fish (October to November) had slightly larger gonads, livers and condition indices. Rock gunnel may be a useful indicator to provide insight into local impacts of point sources over a short time period. However, they do not provide adequate information on reproductive development and performance since they are not exposed to onshore contaminants during the periods of gonadal development that have most commonly found to be sensitive to anthropogenic stressors.


Rock gunnel Sentinel species Atlantic Canada Effects monitoring Reproductive status 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, S.M., Shugart, L.R., Southworth, G.R., & Hinton, D.E. (1990). Application of bioindicators in assessing the health of fish populations experiencing contaminant stress. In: J.F. McCarthy and L.M. Shugart (eds), Biomarkers of Environmental Contamination, Lewis Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 333–350.Google Scholar
  2. Bombail, V., Aw, D., Gordon, E., & Batty, J. (2001). Application of the comet and micronucleus assays to butterfish (Pholis gunnellus) erythrocytes from the Firth of Forth, Scotland. Chemosphere 44, 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brillant, S. (1999). The marine food web in relation to the movement and accumulation of toxins in Saint John Harbour, New Brunswick, Canada. M.Sc. Thesis. University of New Brunswick. Saint John, New Brunswick. 145pp.Google Scholar
  4. Bucheli, T. & Fent, K. (1995). Induction of cytochrome P450 as a biomarker for environmental contamination in aquatic ecosystems. Critical Reviews of Environmental Science Technology, 25, 201–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collier, T.K., Johnson, L.L., Stehr, S.M., Meyers, M.S., & Stien J.E. (1998). A comprehensive assessment of the impacts of contaminants on fish from an urban waterway. Marine Environmental Research, 46, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Courtenay, S.C., Munkittrick, K.R., Dupuis, H.M.C., Parker, R., & Boyd, J. (2002). Quantifying impacts of pulp mill effluent on fish in canadian marine and estuarine environments: Problems and progress. Water Qual. Res. J. Can., 37, 79–99.Google Scholar
  7. Environment Canada (1997). Fish monitoring, Fish Survey Section 5.1 technical guidance document for pulp and paper environmental effects monitoring. Ottawa, ON, EEM/1997/7.Google Scholar
  8. Godfrey and Associates (1993). Saint John Harbour Wastewater Strategy. Saint John, New Brunswick. 86pp.Google Scholar
  9. Gudger, E.W. (1927). The nest and nesting habits of the butterfish or gunnel. Pholis gunnellus. Natural History, 27, 65–71.Google Scholar
  10. Koop, J.H., & Gibson, R.N. (1991). Distribution and movements of intertidal butterfish Pholis gunnellus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association. UK, 71, 127–136.Google Scholar
  11. Kruuk, H., Nolet, B., & French, D. (1988). Fluctuations in numbers and activity of inshore demersal fishes in Shetland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association UK., 68, 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Linkov, I., Burnistrov, D., Cura, J., & Bridges, T.S. (2002). Risk-based management of contaminated sediments: Consideration of spatial and temporal patterns in exposure modeling. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayer, F.L., Versteeg, D.J., McKee, M.J., Folmar, L.C., Graney, R.L., McCume, D.C., & Rattner, B.A. (1992). Physiological and Nonspecific Biomarkers. In: R.J. Hugget, R.A. Kimerle, P.M. Mehrle and H.L. Bergman (eds.), Biomarkers: Biochemical, Physiological and Histological Markers of Anthropogenic Stress, Lewis Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 5–61.Google Scholar
  14. McCarthy, J.F., Jiminez, B.D., Shugart, L.R., & Sloop, F.V. (1990). Biological Markers in Animal Sentinels: Laboratory Studies Improve Interpretation of Field Data. In: S.S. Sandhu (ed.), In Situ Evaluations of Biological Hazards of Environmental Pollutants, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 163–175.Google Scholar
  15. MacLatchy, D.L., Courtenay, S.C., Rice, C.D., & Van Der Kraak, G.J. (2003). Development of a short-term reproductive endocrine bioassay using steroid hormone and vitellogenin end points in the estuarine mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 22, 996–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McMaster, M.E., Munkittrick, K.R., Jardine, J.J., Robinson, R.D., & Van Der Kraak, G.J. (1995). Protocol for measuring in vitro steroid production by fish gonadal tissue. 1961. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Munkittrick, K.R., McGeachy, A., McMaster, M.E., & Courtenay, S.C. (2002). Overview of freshwater fish studies from the pulp and paper environmental effects monitoring program. Wat. Qual. Res. J. Can., 37, 49–77.Google Scholar
  18. Proudfoot, L.A. (1975). The biology of the rock gunnel Pholis gunnellus (Linnaeus). Honours thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland. St. John's, NF, Canada. 40ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Qasim, S. (1956). The biology of Blennius pholis L. (Teleostei). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lon., 128, 161–208.Google Scholar
  20. Qasim, S. (1957). The biology of Centronotus gunnellus (L.) (Teleostei). Journal of Animal Ecology, 26, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sawyer, P. (1967). Intertidal life-history of the rock gunnel, Pholis gunnellus, in the Western Atlantic. Copeia, 1967, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scott, W.B., & Scott, M.G. (1988). Atlantic Fishes of Canada. Canadian Bulletin of Fishries Aquatic Science, 219, p. 713.Google Scholar
  23. Vallis, L.E. (2004). The potential use of rock gunnel (Pholis gunnellus) as a bioindicator in Saint John harbour, New Brunswick, Canada. University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada. p. 97.Google Scholar
  24. Walker, S.L., Hedley, K., & Porter, E.L. (2002). Pulp and paper environmental effects monitoring in Canada: An overview. Wat. Qual. Res. J. Can., 37, 7–19.Google Scholar
  25. Washburn and Gillis Associates Ltd. (1993). Saint John Harbour Environmental Quality Study. Fredericton, New Brunswick.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Vallis
    • 1
  • D. L. Maclatchy
    • 1
  • K. R. Munkittrick
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology and Canadian Rivers InstituteUniversity of New BrunswickSaint JohnCanada
  2. 2.Department of Biology and Canadian Rivers Institute and Canada Research Chair in Ecosystem Health AssessmentUniversity of New BrunswickSaint JohnCanada

Personalised recommendations