Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 117, Issue 1–3, pp 145–155 | Cite as

The Parameter Optimization in the Inverse Distance Method by Genetic Algorithm for Estimating Precipitation

  • Chia-Ling Chang
  • Shang-Lien Lo
  • Shaw-L Yu
Article

Abstract

The inverse distance method, one of the commonly used methods for analyzing spatial variation of rainfall, is flexible if the order of distances in the method is adjustable. By applying the genetic algorithm (GA), the optimal order of distances can be found to minimize the difference between estimated and measured precipitation data. A case study of the Feitsui reservoir watershed in Taiwan is described in the present paper. The results show that the variability of the order of distances is small when the topography of rainfall stations is uniform. Moreover, when rainfall characteristic is uniform, the horizontal distance between rainfall stations and interpolated locations is the major factor influencing the order of distances. The results also verify that the variable-order inverse distance method is more suitable than the arithmetic average method and the Thiessen Polygons method in describing the spatial variation of rainfall. The efficiency and reliability of hydrologic modeling and hence of general water resource management can be significantly improved by more accurate rainfall data interpolated by the variable-order inverse distance method.

Keywords

genetic algorithm inverse distance precipitation interpolation rainfall spatial variation watershed hydrology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartier, P. M. and Keller, C. P.: 1996, ‘Multivariate interpolation to incorporate thematic surface data using inverse distance weighting (IDW)’, Comput. Geosci. 22(7), 795–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaubey, I., Haan, C. T., Grunwald, S. and Salisbury, J. M.: 1999, ‘Uncertainty in the model parameters due to spatial variability of rainfall’, J. Hydrol. 220, 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng, C. T., Ou, C. P. and Chau, K. W.: 2002, ‘Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall-runoff model calibration’, J. Hydrol. 268, 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dirks, K. N., Hay, J. E., Stow, C. D. and Harris, D.: 1998, ‘High-resolution studies of rainfall on Norfolk island, Part IO: The spatial variability of rainfall’, J. Hydrol. 208, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dirks, K. N., Hay, J. E., Stow, C. D. and Harris, D.: 1998, ‘High-resolution studies of rainfall on Norfolk island, Part II: Interpolation of rainfall data’, J. Hydrol. 208, 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donald, L. Ph. and Danny, G. M.: 1996, ‘Spatial uncertainty analysis: Propagation of interpolation errors in spatially distributed models’, Ecol. Model. 91, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Faures, J. M., Goodrich, D. C., Davis, A. W. and Soroosh, S.: 1995, ‘Impact of small-scale spatial variability on runoff modeling’, J. Hydrol. 173, 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldberd, D. E.: 1989, Genetic Algorithm in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Nalder, I. A. and Wein, R. W.: 1998, ‘Spatial interpolation of climatic normals: Test of a new method in the Canadian boreal forest’, Agric. For. Meteorol. 92, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tabios, G. O. and Salas, J. D.: 1985, ‘A comparative analysis of techniques for spatial interpolation of precipitation’, Water Resour. Res. 21, 365–380.Google Scholar
  11. Todini, E. and Ferraresi, M.: 1996, ‘Influence of parameter estimation uncertainty in Kriging’, J. Hydrol. 175, 555–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Troutman, B. M.: 1983, ‘Runoff prediction errors and bias in parameter estimation induced by spatial variability of precipitation’, Water Resour. Res. 19(3), 791–810.Google Scholar
  13. Vicente, L. L.: 1996, ‘On the effect of uncertainty in spatial distribution of rainfall on catchment modeling’, Catena 28, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang, Q. J.: 1991, ‘The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models’, Water Resour. Res. 27(9), 2467–2471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Environmental EngineeringNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiChinese Taiwan
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations