Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 116, Issue 1–3, pp 459–479

Development and Applications of Microbial Ecogenomic Indicators for Monitoring Water Quality: Report of a Workshop Assessing the State of the Science, Research Needs and Future Directions

  • Richard Devereux
  • Parke Rublee
  • John H. Paul
  • Katharine G. Field
  • Jorge W. Santo Domingo

DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-7665-7

Cite this article as:
Devereux, R., Rublee, P., Paul, J.H. et al. Environ Monit Assess (2006) 116: 459. doi:10.1007/s10661-006-7665-7


This article brings forth recommendations from a workshop sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Science to Achieve Results (STAR) and Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (EMAP) Programs and by the Council of State Governments, held during May 2002 in Kansas City, Kansas. The workshop assembled microbial ecologists and environmental scientists to determine what research and science is needed to bring existing molecular biological approaches and newer technologies arising from microbial genomic research into environmental monitoring and water quality assessments. Development of genomics and proteomics technologies for environmental science is a very new area having potential to improve environmental water quality assessments. The workshop participants noted that microbial ecologists are already using molecular biological methods well suited for monitoring and water quality assessments and anticipate that genomics-enabled technologies could be made available for monitoring within a decade. Recommendations arising from the workshop include needs for (i) identification of informative microbial gene sequences, (ii) improved understandings of linkages between indicator taxa, gene expression and environmental condition, (iii) technological advancements towards field application, and (iv) development of the appropriate databases.


ecogenomics genomics microbiology proteomics source tracking 

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Devereux
    • 1
  • Parke Rublee
    • 2
  • John H. Paul
    • 3
  • Katharine G. Field
    • 4
  • Jorge W. Santo Domingo
    • 5
  1. 1.U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Gulf Ecology DivisionGulf BreezeUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA
  3. 3.College of Marine ScienceUniversity of South FloridaSt. PetersburgUSA
  4. 4.Department of MicrobiologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  5. 5.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research LaboratoryWater Supply and Water Resources DivisionCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations