Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 112, Issue 1–3, pp 69–91 | Cite as

Changes of Land Use and of Ecosystem Service Values in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China

  • Zongming WangEmail author
  • Bai Zhang
  • Shuqing Zhang
  • Xiaoyan Li
  • Dianwei Liu
  • Kaishan Song
  • Jianping Li
  • Fang Li
  • Hongtao Duan
Article

Abstract

Agricultural activities, especially reclamation, are considered major threats to the wetland ecosystems in Sanjiang Plain, the largest concentrated area of the freshwater wetlands in China. In the past decades, the area of the cultivated land and its grain production have been increased at the cost of wetlands shrinkage. The large-scale land reclamation severely affected the ecosystems in this region. However, such effects at the regional scale are seldom evaluated quantitatively. We used three datasets of LANDSAT MSS and/or TM imagery to estimate the area changes and the transition of land use types from 1980 to 2000. We also valued changes in ecosystem services delivered by each land category using value coefficients published by Costanza et al. [Nature 387, 1997, 253–260]. Sensitivity analysis suggested that these estimates were relatively robust. Finally, the contribution of various ecosystem functions was ranked to the overall value of the ecosystem services in this study. According to our estimates, the total annual ecosystem service values in Sanjiang Plain have declined by about 40% between 1980 and 2000 ($156284–182572.18 million in total over 20 years). This substantial decline is largely attributed to the 53.4% loss of wetlands. For individual ecosystem functions, waste treatment, water supply and disturbance regulation account for more than 60% to the total ecological values. During those two decades, the contribution of disturbance regulation, cultural and recreation decreased, while the contribution of water regulation, nutrient cycling, food production, raw materials and climate regulation increased during the same period. We also put forward a few proposals concerning the future land use policy formulation and sustainable ecosystems. They are adjusting the ‘food first’ agricultural policy, establishing more nature reserves for wetlands, creating systems for the rational use of water, harnessing the degraded cultivated land and encouraging eco-tourism.

Keywords

ecosystem services land use change remote sensing Sanjiang Plain China wetland reclamation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacilli, M. J. and Mendelsohn, L.: 1992, ‘Assessing the economic value of traditional medians from tropical rain forest’, Conserv. Biol. 6, 128–130.Google Scholar
  2. Bradshaw, T. K. and Muller, B.: 1998, ‘Impacts of rapid urban growth on farmland conversion: Application of new regional land use policy models and geographical information systems’, Rural Sociol. 1, 1–25.Google Scholar
  3. Burgi, M. and Turner, M. G.: 2002, ‘Factors and processes shaping land cover and land cover changes along the Wisconsin river’, Ecosystems 5, 184–201.Google Scholar
  4. Chase, T. N., Pielke, R. A., Kittel, T. G. F., Nemani, R. R. and Running, S. W.: 1999, ‘Simulated impacts of historical land cover changes on global climate in northern winter’, Climate Dyn. 16, 93–105.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, G. Q.: 1996, Study on Marsh in Sanjiang Plain, Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  6. Chinese National Agricultural Regionalization Committee: 1979, Chinese National Technical Standard for Land Use Survey, China Agricultural Press, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  7. Chopra, K.: 1993, ‘The value of non-timber forest products: An estimation for tropical deciduous forests in India’, Econ. Bot. 47, 251–257.Google Scholar
  8. Chopra, R., Verma, V. K. and Sharma, P. K.: 2001, ‘Mapping, monitoring and conservation of Harike wetland ecosystem, Punjab, India, through remote sensing’, Int. J. Remote Sens. 1, 89–98.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, M. B., Bearly, T. L., Burke, I. C. and Lauenroth, W. K.: 1994, ‘Linking Ecological Simulation Models to Geographic Information Systems: An Automated Solution’, in: W. K. Michener, J. W. Brunt and S. G. Stafford (eds), Environmental Information Management Ecosystem to Global Scale, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 397–412.Google Scholar
  10. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and van den Belt, M.: 1997, ‘The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital’, Nature 387, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and van den Belt, M.: 1998, ‘Auditing the earth: The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Costanza and his co-authors reply’, Environment 40, 26–27.Google Scholar
  12. Cui, B. S. and Liu, X. T.: 1999, ‘Ecological character changes and sustainability management of wetland in Sanjiang Plain’, Area Res. Dev. 3, 45–48 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  13. Cui, B. S. and Liu, X. T.: 2001, ‘An analysis on ecological character changes of wetlands of Naolihe drainage basin in Sanjiang Plain’, J. Nat. Resour. 2, 105–114 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  14. Daily, G.: 1997, ‘Introduction: What are Ecosystem Services?’, in G. Daily (eds), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  15. Department for Farm Administration of Heilongjiang Province: 2000, Annual Statistics of Reclamation Region in Heilongjiang Province of 2000, China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. ESRI (Environmental System Research Institute) (eds): 1994, Understanding GIS: The ARC/INFO Method, Environmental System Research Institute, Redlands.Google Scholar
  17. Fu, B. J., Guo, X. D., Chen, L. D., Ma, K. M. and Li, J. R.: 2001, ‘Soil nutrient changes due to land use changes in Northern China: A case study in Zunhua County, Hebei Province’, Soil Use Manage. 17, 294–296.Google Scholar
  18. Gerakis, A. and Kalburtji, K.: 1998, ‘Agricultural activities affecting the functions and values of Ramsar wetland sites of Greece’, Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 70, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo, D. B. and Wei, Y. X.: 1997, ‘The study on land reclamation and environmental situation changes in Sanjiang Plain’, Sci. Geogr. Sin. 17, 473–478 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  20. Hao, Q. J., Wang, Q. C., Wang, Y. S. and Wang, C. K.: 2003, ‘The impact of reclamation activities on soil sulfur content in Sanjiang Plain’, Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 5, 614–618 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  21. Houghton, R. A., Lefkowitz, D. S. and Skole, D. L.: 1991, ‘Changes in the landscape of Latin-America between 1880 and 1985 I. Progressive loss of forests’, Forest Ecol. Manage. 38, 143–172.Google Scholar
  22. Houghton, R. A.: 1994, ‘The worldwide extent of land-use change’, Bioscience 44, 305–313.Google Scholar
  23. Houghton, R. A., Hackler, J. L. and Lawrence, K. T.: 1999, ‘The U.S. carbon budget: Contribution from land-use change’, Science 285, 574–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hyde, W. F. and Kanel, K. R.: 1994, ‘The Marginal Cost of Endangered Species Management’, in M. Munasinghe and J. McNeely (eds), Protected Area Economics and Policy, IUCN, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Jensen, J. R., Narumalani, S., Weatherbee, O. and Mackey, J. R.: 1993, ‘Measurement of seasonal and yearly cattail and waterlily changes using multi date SPOT panchromatic data’, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 59, 519–525.Google Scholar
  26. Jensen, J. R., Rutchey, K., Koch, M. S. and Narumalani, S.: 1995, ‘Inland wetland change detection in the Everglades water conservation area using a time series of normalized remotely sensed data’, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 61, 199–209.Google Scholar
  27. Jia, B. Q., Zhang, Z. Q., Ci, L. J., Ren, Y. P., Pan, B. R. and Zhang, Z.: 2004, ‘Oasis land-use dynamics and its influence on the oasis environment in Xinjiang, China’, J. Arid Environ. 56, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koeln, G.: 1992, ‘How wet is this wetland?’, Earth Obs. Mag. 7/8, 36–39.Google Scholar
  29. Kreuter, U. P., Harris, H. G., Matlock, M. D. and Lacey, R. E.: 2001, ‘Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas’, Ecol. Econ. 39, 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lambin, E. F., Baulies, X., Bockstael, N., Fischer, G., Krug, T., Leemans, R., Moran, E. F., Rindfuss, R. R., Sato, Y., Skole, D., Turner II, B. L. and Vogel, C.: 1999, Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC): Implementation Strategy, IGBP Report No. 48, IHDP Report No. 10, IGBP and IHDP, Stockholm and Bonn.Google Scholar
  31. Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., Coomes, O. T., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., George, P. S., Homewood, K., Imbernon, J., Leemans, R., Li, X., Moran, E. F., Mortimore, M., Ramakrishnan, P. S., Richards, J. F., Skanes, H., Steffen, W., Stone, G. D., Svedin, U., Veldkamp, T. A., Vogel, C. and Xu, J.: 2001, ‘The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths’, Glob. Environ. Change 11, 261–269.Google Scholar
  32. Liu, X. T.: 1998, ‘Research on sustainable land use strategy in Sanjiang Plain’, Res. Agric. Modern. 5, 307–310 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  33. Liu, X. T.: 1999, ‘The marsh resources and their sustainable utilization’, Sci. Geogr. Sin. 3, 451–460.Google Scholar
  34. Liu, X. T. and Ma, X. H.: 2002, Natural Environmental Changes and Ecological Protection in Sanjiang Plain, Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  35. Masood, E. and Garwin, L.: 1998, ‘Audacious bid to value the planet whips up a storm’, Nature 395, 430.Google Scholar
  36. Meyer, W. B. and Turner II, B. L.: 1991, Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  37. Munasinghe, M.: 1994, ‘Economic and Policy Issues in Natural Habitats and Protected Areas’, in M. Munasinghe and J. Mc-Neely (eds), Protected Area Economics and Policy, IUCN, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  38. Munyati, C.: 2000, ‘Wetland change detection on the Kafue Flats, Zambia, by classification of a multitemporal remote sensing image dataset’, Int. J. Remote Sens. 9, 1787–1806.Google Scholar
  39. Pearce, D.: 1998, ‘Auditing the earth: The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital’, Environment 40, 23–28.Google Scholar
  40. Peters, C. M., Gentry, A. H. and Mendelsohn, R. O.: 1989, ‘Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest’, Nature 339, 655–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pimm, S. L.: 1997, ‘The value of everything’, Nature 387, 231–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ringrose, S., Matheson, W. and Boyle, T.: 1988, ‘Differentiation of ecological zones in the Okavango Delta, Bostwana, by classification and contextual analyses of Landsat MSS data’, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 54, 601–608.Google Scholar
  43. Sala, O. E., Chapin, F. S., Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Seidl, A. F. and Moraes, A. S.: 2000, ‘Global valuation of ecosystem services: Application to the Pantanal da Nhecolandia, Brazil’, Ecol. Econ. 33, 1–6.Google Scholar
  44. Skole, D. L., Chomentowski, W. H., Salas, W. A. and Nobre, A. D.: 1994, ‘Physical and human dimensions of deforestation in Amazonia’, Bioscience 44, 314–322.Google Scholar
  45. Swetnam, R. D., Mountford, J. O., Armstrong, A. C., Growin, D. T. G., Brown, N. J., Manchester, S. J. and Trek, J. R.: 1998, ‘Spatial relationships between site hydrology and the occurrence of grassland of conservation importance: A risk assessment with GIS’, J. Environ. Manage. 54, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: The Annotated Ramsar List: China, http://www.ramsar.org/profiles_China.htm.
  47. Tolba, M. K. and El-Kholy, O. A. (eds): 1992, The World Environment 1972–1992, Two Decades of Challenge, Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  48. Toman, M.: 1998, ‘Why not calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital’, Ecol. Econ. 25, 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner II, B. L., Ross, R. H. and Skole, D.: 1993, Relating Land-Use and Global Land Cover Change, IGBP Report No. 24, HDP Report No. 5, IGBP of the ICSU and HDP of the ISSC, Stockholm and Geneva.Google Scholar
  50. Turner II, B. L., Skole, D., Sanderson, S., Fischer, G., Fresco, L. O. and Leemans, R.: 1995, Land-Use and Land-Cover Change, Science/Research Plan, IGBP Report No. 35, HDP Report No. 7, IGBP of the ICSU and HDP of the ISSC, Stockholm and Geneva.Google Scholar
  51. Verburg, P. H., Veldkamp, A. and Bouma, J.: 1999, ‘Land-use change under conditions of high population pressure: The case of Java’, Glob. Environ. Change 9, 303–312.Google Scholar
  52. Verstraete, M. M., Pinty, B. and Myneni, R. B.: 1996, ‘Potential and limitations of information extraction on the terrestrial biosphere from satellite remote sensing’, Remote Sens. Environ. 58, 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J. M.: 1997, ‘Human domination of earth's ecosystems’, Science 277, 494–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang, A. H., Zhang, S. Q. and Zhang, B.: 2003, ‘A study on the change of spatial pattern of wetland in Sanjiang Plain’, Acta Ecol. Sin. 2, 238–243 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  55. Weng, Q. H.: 2002, ‘Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic modeling’, J. Environ. Manage. 64, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. White, P. C. L., Gregory, K. W., Lindsey, P. J. and Richards, G.: 1997, ‘Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain: A case study of the Otter (lutra lutra) and the water vole Arvicola terrestris’, Biol. Conserv. 82, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams, M.: 1990, Protection and Retrospection. In Wetlands: A Threatened Landscape, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  58. Xavier, B. and Szejwach, G.: 1998, LUCC Data Requirements Workshop: Survey of Needs, Gaps and Priorities on Data for Land-Use/Land-Cover Change Research, Institut Cartogra. c de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  59. Yan, M. H., Deng, W. and Ma, X.H.: 2001, ‘Climate variation in Sanjiang Plain caused by large scale reclamation during the Last 45 years’, Acta Geogr. Sin. 2, 159–170 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  60. Zalidis, G. C., Mantzavelas, A. L. and Gourvelou, E.: 1997, ‘Environment impacts on Greek wetlands’, Wetlands 17, 339–345.Google Scholar
  61. Zhang, S. Q., Zhang, B. and Wang, A. H.: 2001, ‘A study on the relationship between distributive variation of wetlands and regional climate change in Sanjiang Plain’, Adv. Earth Sci. 6, 836–841 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  62. Zhao, B., Kreuter, U. P., Li, B., Ma, Z. J., Chen, J. K. and Nakagoshi, N.: 2004, ‘An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China’, Land Use Policy 21, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zongming Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bai Zhang
    • 1
  • Shuqing Zhang
    • 1
  • Xiaoyan Li
    • 1
  • Dianwei Liu
    • 1
  • Kaishan Song
    • 1
  • Jianping Li
    • 1
  • Fang Li
    • 1
  • Hongtao Duan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RS and GIS, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural EcologyChinese Academy of SciencesChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations