Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 121, Issue 1–3, pp 615–638 | Cite as

Predicting Water Quality Impaired Stream Segments using Landscape-Scale Data and a Regional Geostatistical Model: A Case Study in Maryland

  • Erin E. PetersonEmail author
  • N. Scott Urquhart
Article

Abstract

In the United States, probability-based water quality surveys are typically used to meet the requirements of Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act. The survey design allows an inference to be generated concerning regional stream condition, but it cannot be used to identify water quality impaired stream segments. Therefore, a rapid and cost-efficient method is needed to locate potentially impaired stream segments throughout large areas. We fit a set of geostatistical models to 312 samples of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) collected in 1996 for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey using coarse-scale watershed characteristics. The models were developed using two distance measures, straight-line distance (SLD) and weighted asymmetric hydrologic distance (WAHD). We used the Corrected Spatial Akaike Information Criterion and the mean square prediction error to compare models. The SLD models predicted more variability in DOC than models based on WAHD for every autocovariance model except the spherical model. The SLD model based on the Mariah autocovariance model showed the best fit (r2 = 0.72). DOC demonstrated a positive relationship with the watershed attributes percent water, percent wetlands, and mean minimum temperature, but was negatively correlated to percent felsic rock type. We used universal kriging to generate predictions and prediction variances for 3083 stream segments throughout Maryland. The model predicted that 90.2% of stream kilometers had DOC values less than 5 mg/l, 6.7% were between 5 and 8 mg/l, and 3.1% of streams produced values greater than 8 mg/l. The geostatistical model generated more accurate DOC predictions than previous models, but did not fit the data equally well throughout the state. Consequently, it may be necessary to develop more than one geostatistical model to predict stream DOC throughout Maryland. Our methodology is an improvement over previous methods because additional field sampling is not necessary, inferences about regional stream condition can be made, and it can be used to locate potentially impaired stream segments. Further, the model results can be displayed visually, which allows results to be presented to a wide variety of audiences easily.

Keywords

dissolved organic carbon geostatistics hydrologic distance streams waterquality monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Geological Institute: 1987, Glossary of Geology 3rd Edition, Thomson-Shore, Inc., Alexandria, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Amrhein, C. and Suarez, D. L.: 1988, ‘The Use of a Surface Complexation Model to Describe the Kinetics of Ligand-Promoted Dissolution of Anorthite’, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 52, 2785–2793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, T. C. and Gatrell, A. C.: 1995, Interactive spatial data analysis, Pearson Education Limited, Essex, England.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, P. C.: 1991, ‘Quartz Dissolution in Organic-Rich Aqueous Systems’, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 55, 1781–1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boward, D., Kayzak, P., Stranko, S., Hurd, M. and Prochaska, A.: 1999, ‘From the Mountains to the Sea: The State of Maryland’s Freshwater Streams’, EPA/903/R-99/023, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division, Annapolis, MD, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., Nocedal, J. l., Zhu, C., and Siam, J.: 1995, ‘A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization’, Scientific Computing 16, 1190–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canham, C. D., Pace, M. L., Papaik, M. J., Primack, A. G. B., Roy, K. M., Maranger, R. J., Curran, R. P. and Spada, D. M.: 2004, ‘A Spatially Explicit Watershed-Scale Analysis of Dissolved Organic Carbon in Adirondack Lakes’, Ecological Applications, 14, 839–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Copeland, C.: 2002, ‘Water Quality: Implementing the Clean Water Act’, IB89102, Congressional Research Service, Resources, Science, and Industry Division.Google Scholar
  9. Creed, I. F., Sanford, S. E., Beall, F. D., Molot L. A. and Dillon P. J.: 2003, ‘Cryptic Wetlands: Integrating Hidden Wetlands in Regression Models of the Export of Dissolved Organic Carbon From Forested Landscapes’, Hydrological Processes, 17, 3629–3648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cressie, N.: 1993, Statistics for Spatial Data Revised Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Currie, W. S. and Aber, J. D.: 1997, ‘Model Leaching As A Decomposition Process in Humid Montane Forests’, Ecology 78, 1844–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Driscoll, C. T., Blette, V., Yan, C., Schofield, C. L., Munson, R. and Holsapple, J.: 1995, ‘The Role of Dissolved Organic Carbon in the Chemistry and Bioavailability of Mercury in Remote Adirondack Lakes’, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 80, 499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Earth System Science Center (ESSC): 1998, Soil Information for Environmental Modeling and Ecosystem Management, ESSC, Pennsylvania State University, Web page, Accessed November 5, 2004, http://www.essc.psu.edu/soil_info/index.cgi?soil_data&index.html.
  14. Eckhardt, B. W. and Moore, T. R.: 1990, ‘Controls on Dissolved Organic Carbon Concentrations in Streams, Southern Quebec’, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 47, 1537–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI): 2002, ArcGIS version 8.3, Redlands, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Furnival, G. and Wilson, R.: 1974, ‘Regression by Leaps and Bounds’, Technometrics, 16, 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardner, B. and Sullivan, P. J.: 2003, ‘Spatial and temporal stream temperature prediction: Modeling nonstationary temporal covariance structures’, Water Resources Research, 40, Art. No. W01102.Google Scholar
  18. Gergel, S. E., Turner, M. G. and Kratz, T. K.: 1999, ‘Dissolved Organic Carbon As an Indicator of the Scale of Watershed Influence on Lakes and Rivers’, Ecological Applications, 9, 1377–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haneberg, W. C.: 2005, ‘The Ins and Outs of Airborne Lidar: An Introduction for Practicing Engineering Geologists’, Association of Engineering Geologists News 48, 16–19.Google Scholar
  20. Hejzlar, J., Dubrovsky, M., Buchtele, J., and Ruzicka, M.: 2003, ‘The Apparent and Potential Effects of Climate Change on the Inferred Concentration of Dissolved Organic Matter in a Temperate Stream (the Malse River, South Bohemia)’, The Science of the Total Environment, 310, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Helsel, D. R. and Hirsch, R. M.: 1992, Statistical Methods in Water Resources, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Herlihy, A. T., Stoddard, J. L. and Johnson, C. B.: 1998, ‘The Relationship Between Stream Chemistry and Watershed Land Cover Data in the Mid-Atlantic Region, U.S.’, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 105, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herlihy, A. T., Larsen, D. P., Paulsen, S. G., Urquhart, N. S. and Rosenbaum, B. J.: 2000, ‘Designing a Spatially Balanced, Randomized Site Selection Process for Regional Stream Surveys: The EMAP Mid-Atlantic Pilot Study’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 63, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoeting, J. A., Davis, R. A., Merton, A. A. and Thompson, S. E.: 2006, ‘Model Selection for Geostatistical Models’, Ecological Applications, 16, to appear.Google Scholar
  25. Houle, D., Carignan, R., Lachance, M. and Dupont, J.: 1995, ‘Dissolved Organic Carbon and Sulfur in Southwestern Quebec Lakes: Relationships With Catchment and Lake Properties’, Limnology and Oceanography, 40, 710–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ihaka, R. and Gentleman, R.: 1996, ‘R: a Language for Data Analysis and Graphics’, Journal of the Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5, 299–314.Google Scholar
  27. Kellum, B.: 2003, ‘Analysis and Modeling of Acid Neutralizing Capacity in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands Area’, MS Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 69 p.Google Scholar
  28. Kiffney, P. M., Clements, W. H. and Cady, T. A.: 1997, ‘Influence of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Colonization Dynamics of a Rocky Mountain Stream Benthic Community’, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16, 520–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kortelainen, P.: 1993, ‘Content of Total Organic Carbon in Finnish Lakes and Its Relationship to Catchment Characteristics’, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50, 1477–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maryland Department of Natural Resources: 1999, State of the Streams: 1995–1997 Maryland Biological Stream Survey Results, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Mercurio, G., Chaillou, J. C. and Roth, N. E.: 1999, Guide to Using 1995–1997 Maryland Biological Stream Survey Data, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Mulholland, P. J.: 2003, ‘Large-Scale Patterns in Dissolved Organic Carbon Concentration, Flux, and Sources’, in: S.E.G. Findlay, and R. L. Sinsabough (eds.), Aquatic Ecosystems: Interactivity of Dissolved Organic Matter, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC): 2003, ‘U.S. Federal Region III land cover data set’, Web page, Accessed June 17, 2005, http://www.epa.gov/mrlc/.
  34. Neff, J. C. and Asner, G. P.: 2001, ‘Dissolved Organic Carbon in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Synthesis and a Model’, Ecosystems, 4, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olea, R. A.: 1991, Geostatistical Glossary and Multilingual Dictionary, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Olsen, A. R. and Ivanovich, M.: 1993, EMAP Monitoring Strategy and Sampling Design, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Research Laboratory Corvallis (OR): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA. Video.Google Scholar
  37. Omernik, J. M.: 1987, ‘Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77, 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ouyang, Y.: 2003, ‘Simulating Dynamic Load of Naturally Occurring TOC From Watershed into a River’, Water Research, 37, 823–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peterson, E. E.: 2005, ‘Predicting the likelihood of water quality impaired stream segments using landscape-scale data and a hierarchical methodology’, PhD Dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 293 p.Google Scholar
  40. Peterson, E. E., Merton, A. A., Theobald, D. M. and Urquhart, N. S.: in press, ‘Patterns of spatial autocorrelation in stream water chemistry’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.Google Scholar
  41. Prusha, B. A. and Clements, W. H.: 2004, ‘Landscape Attributes, Dissolved Organic C, and Metal Bioaccumulation in Aquatic Macroinvertebrates (Arkansas River Basin, Colorado)’, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 23, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Qualls, R. G. and Haines, B. L.: 1992, ‘Biodegradability of Dissolved Organic Matter in Forest Throughfall, Soil Solution, and Stream Water’, Soil Science Society of American Journal, 56, 578–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rasmussen, J. B., Godbout, L. and Schallenberg, M.: 1989, ‘The Humic Content of Lake Water and Its Relationship to Watershed and Lake Morphometry’, Limnology and Oceanography, 34, 1336–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spatial Climate Analysis Service (SCAS): 1996, Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM), SCAS, Oregon State University, Web page, Accessed October 23, 2004, http://www.ocs.orst.edu/prism/
  45. Strahler, A. N.: 1957, ‘Quantitative Analysis of Watershed Geomorphology’, Transaction of the American Geophysical Union, 21, 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sullivan, T. J., Driscoll, C. T., Gherini, S. A., Munson, R. K., Cooks, R. B., Charles, D. F. and Yatsko, C. P.: 1989, ‘Influence of Aqueous Aluminum and Organic Acids on Measurement of Acid Neutralizing Capactiy in Surface Waters’, Nature, 338, 408–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Theobald, D. M., Norman, J., Peterson, E. and Ferraz, S.: 2005, ‘Functional Linkage of Watersheds and Streams (FLoWs): Network-Based ArcGIS Tools to Analyze Freshwater Ecosystems’, in: Proceedings of the ESRI User Conference 2005, July 25–29, 2005, San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  48. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): 1987, ‘Determination of Dissolved Organic Carbon and Dissolved Inorganic Carbon’, in: Handbook of Methods for Acid Deposition Studies: Laboratory Analysis for Surface Water Chemistry, EPA 600/4-87/026, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  49. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): 2001, Survey Designs for Sampling Surface Water Condition in the West, EPA A620/R-01/004c, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  50. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): 2005, Level III Ecoregions, Web page, Accessed August 13, 2003, http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/level_iii.htm.
  51. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS): 2003, National Elevation Dataset, Web page, Accessed January 4, 2005, Available at http://ned.usgs.gov/.
  52. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS): 2004, National Hydrography Dataset, Web page, Accessed January 27, 2005, Available at http://nhd.usgs.gov/.
  53. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS): 2005, Land Use Land Cover (LULC), Web page, Accessed May 25, 2005, Available at http://edc.usgs.gov/products/landcover/lulc.html
  54. Ver Hoef, J. M., Peterson, E. E. and Theobald, D. M.: 2007, ‘Some New Spatial Statistical Models for Stream Networks’, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, to appear.Google Scholar
  55. Vogelmann, J. E., Howard, S. M., Yang, L., Larson, C. R., Wylie, B. K. and Van Driel, N.: 2001, ‘Completion of the 1990’s National Land Cover Data Set for the Conterminous United States From Landsat Thematic Mapper Data and Ancillary Data Sources’, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 650–652.Google Scholar
  56. Wetzel, R. G.: 1992, ‘Gradient-Dominated Ecosystems: Sources and Regulatory Functions of Dissolved Organic Matter in Freshwater Ecosystems’, Hydrobiologia, 229, 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williamson, C. E., Stemberger, R. S., Morris, D. P., Frost, T. M. and Paulsen, S. G.: 1996, ‘Ultraviolet Radiation in North American Lakes: Attenuation Estiamtes From DOC Measurements and Implications for Plankton Communities’, Limnology and Oceanography, 41, 1024–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yuan, L. L.: 2004, ‘Using Spatial Interpolation to Estimate Stressor Levels in Unsampled Streams’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 94, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIRO Mathematical & Information SciencesQueensland Bioscience PrecinctSt. LuciaAustralia
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations