Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 119, Issue 1–3, pp 459–480 | Cite as

An exploration of the relationships betweenmacroinvertebrate community composition and physical andchemical habitat characteristics in farm dams

  • Meredith Brainwood
  • Shelley Burgin
Article

Abstract

Recently, Australian interest in farm dams has focused on rates of harvest of surface waters (runoff), and the impact this has on nearby natural systems. Little research has been directed towards the role of these artificial water bodies in sustaining biological reserves within the wider ecosystem. Macroinvertebrate communities in three farm dams in the Central Tablelands of New South Wales were surveyed, and water quality variables were correlated with species richness and abundance. Community responses to habitat factors including sediment depth, stock use, vegetation and debris were also examined. Communities were described at several taxonomic levels in addition to allocation to trophic groups and primary functional feeding groups.

Species richness and abundance of communities were found to vary between dams and between habitat types within dams. The extent of these differences was decreased when communities were described by either trophic status or functional feeding mechanisms. Habitats were influenced by water quality and by physical features of the habitat, with the two factors interacting to define equilibrium conditions. Localised conditions resulted in different macroinvertebrate communities. Physicochemical parameters that correlated most closely with communities included light penetration, chlorophyll-a and conductivity. Habitat factors that were most frequently linked with communities were sediment depth and canopy cover, with localised disturbances related to stock use affecting feeding groups rather than specific taxa.

One of the major problems associated with increasing modification of landscapes by agriculture or urbanisation is the fragmentation of undisturbed habitats. Creation of joint aquatic and woodland habitats enhances biodiversity corridors. The recognition of the potential for farm dams as reservoirs of biodiversity and development of management practices that optimise this neglected biodiversity reserve may have much wider benefits biologically, aesthetically and productively.

Keywords

farm dams macroinvertebrates water quality habitat mosaic feeding guilds 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barlow, C. G. and Bock, K.: 1981, Fish for Farm Dams: Final Report, NSW Fisheries, Sydney.Google Scholar
  2. Bennison, G. L., Hillman, T. J. and Suter, P. J.: 1989, Macroinvertebrates of the River Murray (Survey and Monitoring: 1980–1985), Murray Darling Basin Commission, Water Quality Report No. 3.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, P. E. and Lerch, R. N.: 2000, ‘Watershed vulnerability to losses of agricultural chemicals: Interactions of chemistry, hydrology and land-use’, Envir. Sci. Tech. 34, 3315–3322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boulton, A. J.: 2003, ‘Parallels and contrasts in the effects of drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages’, Freshwat. Biol. 48, 1173–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brainwood, M. A.: 2002, An Exploration of Ecosystem Processes in Three Sympatrically Located Farm Dams near Raglan, New South Wales, M.Sc.(hons) thesis, University of Western Sydney, Richmond.Google Scholar
  6. Brainwood, M. A., Burgin, S. and Maheshwari, B.: 2004, ‘Temporal variations in water quality of farm dams: Impacts of land use and water sources’, Ag. Wat. Man. 70, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cairns, J. Jr, (ed): 1982, Artificial Substrates, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  8. Chessman, B. C.: 1995, ‘Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: A procedure based on habitat specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index’, Aust. J. Ecol. 20, 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chessman, B. C.: 1999, ‘Predicting the macroinvertebrate faunas of rivers by multiple regression of biological and environmental differences’, Freshwat. Biol. 41, 747–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, K. R. and Gorley, R. N.: 2001, PRIMER v5: User Manual/Tutorial, PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, K. R. and Warwick, R. M.: 2001, Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd ed., PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Coler, R. A. and Rockwood, J. P.: 1989, Water Pollution Biology: A Laboratory/Field Handbook, Technomic Publishing, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  13. Collier, K. J., Wilcock, R. J. and Meredith, A. S.: 1998, ‘Influence of substrate type and physicochemical conditions on macroinvertebrate faunas and biotic indices of some lowland Waikato, New Zealand, streams’, N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 32, 1–19.Google Scholar
  14. Cover, E. C. and Harrel, R. C.: 1978, ‘Sequences of colonisation, diversity, biomass and productivity of macroinvertebrates on artificial substrates in a freshwater canal’, Hydrobiologia. 59, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Covich, A. P., Crowl, T. A. and Scatena, F. N.: 2003, ‘Effects of extreme low flows on freshwater shrimps in a perennial tropical stream’, Freshwat. Biol. 48, 1199–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. CSIRO Division of Entomology: 1991, The Insects of Australia, 2nd ed., Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  17. De Szalay, F. A. and Resh, V. H.: 2000, ‘Factors influencing macroinvertebrate colonisation of seasonal wetlands: Responses to emergent plant cover’, Freshwat. Biol. 45, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrier, R. C., Edwards, A. C., Hirst, D., Littlewood, I. G., Watts, C. D. and Morris, R.: 2001, ‘Water quality of Scottish rivers: Spatial and temporal trends’, Sci. Tot. Envir. 265, 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gayraud, S., Statzner, B., Bady, P., Haybachp, A., Scholl, F., Usseglio-Polatera, P. and Bacchi, M.: 2003, ‘Invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: An initial assessment of alternative metrics’, Freshwat. Biol. 48, 2045–2064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goss, M. J., Unc, A. and Chen, S.: 2000, ‘Transport of nitrogen, phosphorus and microorganisms from manure into surface- and groundwater’, in: E. Balazs, E. Galante, J. M. Lynch, J. S. Schepers, J. P. Toutant, D. Werner and P. A. T. Werry (eds.), Biological Resource Management: Connecting Science and Policy, Springer, Berlin, pp. 31–55.Google Scholar
  21. Halse, S. A., Shiel, R. J. and Williams, W. D.: 1998, ‘Aquatic invertebrates of Lake Gregory, northwestern Australia, in relation to salinity and ionic composition’, Hydrobiologia. 381, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hancock, M. A., Timms, B. V., Morton, J. K., Renshaw, B. A.: 2000, ‘The structure of the littoral invertebrate communities of the Kosciuszko Region lakes’, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 122, 69-77.Google Scholar
  23. Hart, B. T.: 1974, ‘A Compilation of Australian Water Quality Criteria’, Australian Water Resources Council Technical Paper No. 7, Australian Government Publishing Services, Canberra.Google Scholar
  24. Hawking, J. H. and Smith, F. J.: 1997, Colour Guide to Invertebrates of Australian Inland Waters, Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Identification Guide No. 8, Albury, Australia.Google Scholar
  25. Hazell, D., Cunningham, R., Lindenmayer, D., Mackey, B. and Osborne, W.: 2001, ‘Use of farm dams as a frog habitat in an Australian agricultural landscape: Factors affecting species richness and distribution’, Biol. Cons. 102, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heino, J.: 2000, ‘Lentic macroinvertebrate assemblage structure along gradients in spatial heterogeneity, habitat size and water chemistry’, Hydrobiologia. 418, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hogg, I. D. and Norris, R. H.: 1991, ‘Effects of runoff from land clearing and urban development on the distribution and abundance of macroinvertebrates in pool areas of a river’, Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 42, 507–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hosomi, M. and Sudo, R.: 1986, ‘Simultaneous determination of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in freshwater samples using Persulfate digestion’, Int. J. Envir. Stud. 27, 267–275.Google Scholar
  29. James, M. R., Weatherhead, M., Stanger, C. and Graynoth, E.: 1998, ‘Macroinvertebrate distribution in the littoral zone of Lake Coleridge, South Island, New Zealand – effects of habitat stability, wind exposure, and macrophytes’, N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 32, 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kovac, M. and Lawrie, J. W.: 1990, ‘Soil Landscapes of the Bathurst, 1:250 000 Sheet’, Soil Conservation Service of NSW, Sydney.Google Scholar
  31. Lake, P. S.: 2003, ‘Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters’, Freshwat. Biol. 48, 1161–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lampert, W. and Sommers, U.: 1997, Limnoecology: The Ecology of Lakes and Streams, Oxford University Press, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Letcher, R. A., Schreider, S. Y., Jakeman, T., Neal, B. P. and Nathan, R. J.: 2002, ‘Methods for the analysis of trends in streamflow response due to changes in catchment condition’, Envrionmetrics 12, 613–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McMahon, T. A. and Finlayson, B. L.: 2003, ‘Droughts and anti-droughts: the low-flow hydrology of Australian rivers’, Freshwat. Biol. 48, 1147–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marchant, R.: 1986a, ‘Some quantitative aspects of the life history of aquatic insects in temperate Australian rivers’, in: P. De Deckker and W. D. Williams (eds), Limnology in Australia, CSIRO, Australia and W. Junk, The Netherlands, pp. 151–158.Google Scholar
  36. Marchant, R.: 1986b, ‘A subsampler for samples of benthic invertebrates’, Bull. Aust. Soc. Limnol. 12, 49–52.Google Scholar
  37. Marchant, R.: 1999, ‘How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment? A comment on the conclusions of Cao et al.’, Limnol. Oceanogr. 44, 1840–1841.Google Scholar
  38. Palomaki, R.: 1994, ‘Response by macrozoobenthos biomass to water level regulation in some Finnish lake littoral zones’, Hydrobiologia 286, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Specht, R. L.: 1970, ‘Vegetation’, in: G. W. Leper (ed), The Australian Environment, 4th ed., CSIRO and Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp. 44–67.Google Scholar
  40. Sponseller, R. A., Benfield, E. F. and Valett, H. M.: 2001, ‘Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities’, Freshwat. Biol. 46, 1409–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Statzner, B., Bis, B., Doledec, S. and Usseglio-Polatera, P.: 2001, ‘Perspectives for biomonitoring at large spatial scales: A unified measure for the functional composition of invertebrate communities in European running waters’, Bas. Appl. Ecol. 2, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stevens, M. H. H. and Cummins, K. W.: 1999, ‘Effects of long-term disturbance on riparian vegetation and in-stream characteristics’, J. Freshwat. Ecol. 14, 1–17.Google Scholar
  43. Timms, B. V.: 1980, ‘Farm dams’, in: W. D. Williams (ed), An Ecological Basis for Water Resource Management, A.N.U. Press, Canberra, Australlia.Google Scholar
  44. Trueman, J. W. H., Lee, W., Bugledich, E. M., Reid, I. A., McKie, B. G. L. and Cranston, P. S.: 1996, Key to Australian Aquatic Invertebrates, CD-ROM, CSIRO Division of Entomology, CSIRO Australia.Google Scholar
  45. US Environmental Protection Agency: 1976, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, USEPA Technology Transfer, Washington.Google Scholar
  46. Vollenweider, R. A. (ed): 1974, ‘A manual on methods for measuring primary production in aquatic environments’, IBP Handbook No. 12, Blackwell Scientific, London.Google Scholar
  47. Walsh, C. J., Sharpe, A. K., Breen, P. F. and Sonneman, J. A.: 2001, ‘Effects of urbanisation on streams of the Melbourne region, Victoria, Australia. I. Benthic macroinvertebrate communities’, Freshwat. Biol. 46, 535–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wetzel, R. G.: 1983, Limnology, 2nd ed., Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  49. Wetzel, R. G.: 1999, ‘Plants and water in and adjacent to lakes’, in: A. J. Baird and R. L. Wilby (eds.), Eco-Hydrology: Plants and Water in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments, Routledge, London, UK, pp. 269–299.Google Scholar
  50. Wiederholm, T.: 1984, ‘Responses of aquatic insects to environmental pollution’, in: V. H. Resh and R. M. Rosenberg (eds.), Ecology of Aquatic Insects, Praeger, New York, pp. 508–557.Google Scholar
  51. Williams, W. D.: 1980, Australian Freshwater Life – the Invertebrates of Australian Inland Waters, Macmillan, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  52. Winterbourn, M. J.: 1981, ‘The use of aquatic invertebrates in studies of stream water quality’, ‘A review of some biological methods for the assessment of water quality with special reference to New Zealand, Part 2’. Water and Soil Technical Publication 22, 5–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Integrated Catchment ManagementUniversity of Western Sydney Hawkesbury CampusSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations