Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 104, Issue 1–3, pp 171–187 | Cite as

Assessing water quality in a tropical lake using biomarkers in zebrafish embryos: developmental toxicity and stress protein responses

  • A. V. HallareEmail author
  • R. Pagulayan
  • N. Lacdan
  • H.-R. Köhler
  • R. Triebskorn
Article

Abstract

In order to achieve a more substantial appraisal of lake water quality, the assessment must not be based only on chemical measurements and analyses of the water itself, but even more so on the impact of existing conditions on aquatic biota. This is possible with the use of biotests or biomarkers, e.g. investigations of the developmental parameters (96-h embryotoxicity evaluate) or of the induction of heat shock proteins (proteotoxicity evaluate). To evaluate the suitability of these tests for environmental screening, fertilized zebrafish eggs were exposed to water samples collected from five sites of varying levels of stress from Laguna Lake, Philippines. Reconstituted water was used as laboratory control while water samples from a highly polluted freshwater source was used as positive control. Developmental parameters were noted and described within 48 and 96 h of exposure. Dilution experiments of the positive control were also done to further assess and compare toxicity potentials of Laguna Lake waters with those originating from a polluted freshwater. After the 96-h exposure, the levels of stress proteins (hsp 70) were determined in embryos from all exposure groups. Results showed 100% mortality in embryos exposed to undiluted positive control (PC) within only 12 h. Increasing dilution levels, however, resulted in lower mortality and lower abnormality rates. No detectable developmental differences were noted among embryos exposed to either the laboratory control or Laguna Lake waters at the end of 96 h, regardless of the source. Very high survival rates and high hatching success rates were observed in embryos exposed to lake waters as well as laboratory control, and the data did not differ significantly among the groups. Likewise, no significant malformations were noted among all developing embryos throughout the exposure period. However, the levels of heat shock proteins in the two sites located closest to Manila, the Philippine capital (Northern West Bay and Central West Bay), showed a pronounced elevation relative to the control, indicating that these stress proteins protect the embryos from the detrimental effects of pollutants in the water. Based on the 96-h early life stage (ELS) test, the water quality of the lake is good for fishery propagation despite the current levels of pollutants in the water. This finding is in accordance with the Class C status (i.e. suitable for fish growth and propagation) as given to the lake by the local environmental agency. On the other hand, data on proteotoxicity showed that the fish are under stress, presumably deriving from pollutants. This calls for a continuous monitoring and improvement of the lake water. The present study indicates that the two biomarker methods are very easy to use, practical, rapid, and sensitive for assessing water quality in a tropical lake and recommends for their incorporation into the future monitoring program of Laguna Lake.

Keywords

early life stage test embryotoxicity environmental monitoring heat shock proteins Laguna Lake proteotoxicity water quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, S.M., Crumby, W.D., Greely Jr., M.S., Ryon, M.G. and Schilling, E. M.: 1992, ‘Relationships between physiological and fish population responses in a contaminated stream,’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11, 1549–1557.Google Scholar
  2. Angeles, F.: 2003, ‘MWSS taps Laguna de Bay water,’, Manila Bull., April 8, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. Bradford, M.M.: 1976, ‘A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding,’, Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Birge, J.W., Black, J.A. and Westerman, A.G.: 1985, ‘Short-term fish and amphibian embryo-larval tests for determining the effects of toxicant stress on early life stages and estimating chronic values for single compounds and complex effluents,’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 4, 807–822.Google Scholar
  5. Cajaraville, M.P., Bebianno, M.J., Blasco, J., Porte, C., Sarasquete, C. and Viarengo, A.: 2000, ‘The use of biomarkers to assess the impact of pollution in coastal environments of the Iberian Peninsula: A practical approach,’, Sci. Total Environ. 247, 295–311.Google Scholar
  6. Clements, W.H.: 2000, ‘Integrating effects of contaminants across levels of biological organization: An overview,’, J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recov. 7, 113–116.Google Scholar
  7. Eckwert, H., Alberti, G. and Köhler, H.-R.: 1997, ‘The induction of stress proteins (hsp) in Oniscus asellus (Isopoda) as a molecular marker of multiple heavy metal exposure. I. Principles and toxicological assessment,’, Ecotoxicology 6, 249–262.Google Scholar
  8. Ensenbach, U. and Nagel, R.: 1997, ‘Toxicity of binary chemical mixtures: Effects on reproduction of zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio),’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 32, 204–210.Google Scholar
  9. Förlin, L., Goksöyr, A. and Husöy, A.M.: 1994, ‘Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenase as Indicator of PCB/Dioxin like Compounds in Fish,’, in: K. J. M. Kramer (ed), Biomonitoring of Coastal Waters and Estuaries, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 135–146.Google Scholar
  10. Franco, A., Malavasi, S., Pranovi, F., Naci, C. and Torricelli, P.: 2002, ‘Ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD) activity and fluctuating asymmetry (FA) in Zosterisessor ophiocephalus(Teleostei, Gobiidae) as indicators of environmental stress in the Venice lagoon,’, J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recov. 9, 239–247.Google Scholar
  11. Hahn, M.E.: 2002, ‘Biomarkers and bioassays for detecting dioxin-like compounds in the marine environment,’, Sci. Total Environ. 289, 49–69.Google Scholar
  12. Handy, R.D., Galloway, T.S. and Depledge, M.H.: 2003, ‘A proposal for the use of biomarkers for the assessment of chronic pollution and in regulatory toxicology,’, Ecotoxicology 12, 331–343.Google Scholar
  13. Hutchinson, T.H., Solbe, J. and Kloepper-Sams, P.J.: 1998, ‘Analysis of the ECETOC aquatic toxicity (EAT) database-III-comparative toxicity of chemical substances to different life stages of aquatic organisms,’, Chemosphere 36, 129–142.Google Scholar
  14. Iwama, G.K., Thomas, P.T., Forsyth, R.B. and Vijayan, M.M.: 1998, ‘Heat shock protein expression in fish’, Rev. Fish. Biol. 8, 35–56.Google Scholar
  15. Jimenez, B.D., Oikari, A., Adams, S.M., Hinton, D.E. and McCarthy, J.F.: 1990, ‘Hepatic Enzymes as Biomarkers: Interpreting the Effects of Environmental, Physiological, and Toxicological Variables,’, in: J.F. McCarthy and L.R. Shugart (eds), Biomarkers of Environmental Contamination, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 123–142.Google Scholar
  16. Karouna-Renier, N.K. and Zehr, J.P.: 1999, ‘Ecological implications of molecular biomarkers: Assaying sub-lethal stress in the midge Chironomus tentans using heat shock protein 70 (HSP-70) expression,’, Hydrobiologia 401, 255–264.Google Scholar
  17. Klumpp, D.W., Humphrey, C., Huasheng, H. and Tao, F.: 2002, ‘Toxic contaminants and their biological effects in coastal waters of Xiamen, China. II. Biomarkers and embryo malformation rates as indicators of pollution stress in fish,’, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 44, 761–769.Google Scholar
  18. Köhler, H.-R., Bartussek, C., Eckwert, H., Farian, K., Gränzer, S., Knigge, T. and Kunz, N.: 2001, ‘The hepatic stress protein (hsp70) response to interacting abiotic parameters in fish exposed to various levels of pollution,’, J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recov. 8, 261–279.Google Scholar
  19. Körner, O.: 2001, ‘Einfluss von xenobiotika auf den Nilbarsch Oreochromis niloticusin Laguna de Bay und Lake Taal, Philippinen,’, Diploma Thesis, University of Tübingen, Germany.Google Scholar
  20. Kristensen, P.: 1995, ‘Sensitivity of Embryos and Larvae in Relation to Other Stages in the Life Cycle of Fish: A Literature Review,’, in: R. Müller and R. Lloyd (eds), Sublethal and Chronic Effects of Pollutants on Freshwater Fish, FAO, Oxford, UK, pp. 155–166.Google Scholar
  21. Luckenbach, T., Kilian, M., Triebskorn, R. and Oberemm, A.: 2001, ‘Fish early life stage tests as a tool to assess embryotoxic potentials in small streams,’, J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recov. 8, 355-370.Google Scholar
  22. Luckenbach, T., Kilian, M., Triebskorn, R. and Oberemm, A.: 2003, ‘Assessment of the developmental success of brown trout (Salmo trutta f. farioL.) embryos in two differently polluted streams in Germany,’, Hydrobiologia 490, 53–62.Google Scholar
  23. McKim, J.M.: 1985, ‘Early Life Stage Toxicity Tests,’, in: G.M. Rand and S.R. Petrocelli (eds), Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology, Hemisphere, New York, pp. 48–95.Google Scholar
  24. Oberemm, A.: 2000, ‘The use of a refined zebrafish embryo bioassay for the assessment of aquatic toxicity,’, Lab. Animal 29(7), 32–40.Google Scholar
  25. Peakall, D.B. and Walker, C.H.: 1994, ‘The role of biomarkers in environmental assessment (3) vertebrates,’, Ecotoxicology 3, 173–179.Google Scholar
  26. Pyza, E., Mak, P., Kramarz, P., and Laskowski, R.: 1997, ‘Heat shock proteins (HSP70) as biomarkers in ecotoxicological studies,’, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 38, 244–251.Google Scholar
  27. Saiz-Salinas, J.I. and Gonzales-Oreja, J.A.: 2000, ‘Stress in estuarine communities: Lessons from the highly-impacted Bilbao estuary (Spain),’, J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recov. 7, 43-55.Google Scholar
  28. Sanders, B.: 1993, ‘Stress proteins in aquatic organisms: An environmental perspective,’, Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 23, 49–75.Google Scholar
  29. Sanders, B.M. and Martin, L.S.: 1993, ‘Stress proteins as biomarkers of contaminant exposure in archived environmental samples,’, Sci. Total Environ. 139/140, 459–470.Google Scholar
  30. Schulte, C. and Nagel, R.: 1994, ‘Testing acute toxicity in the embryo of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio, as an alternative to the acute fish test: Preliminary results,’, ATLA 22, 12–19.Google Scholar
  31. Tacio, H.: 2002, ‘Laguna Lake threatened by runaway development,’, Manila Times, July 14, 2002.Google Scholar
  32. Triebskorn, R., Adam, S., Casper, H., Honnen, W., Pawert, M., Schramm, M., Schwaiger, J. and Köhler, H.-R.: 2002, ‘Biomarkers as diagnostic tools for evaluating effects of unknown past water quality conditions on stream organisms,’, Ecotoxicology 11, 451–465.Google Scholar
  33. Triebskorn, R., Köhler, H.-R., Honnen, W., Schramm, M., Adams, S.M. and Müller, E.: 1997, ‘Induction of heat shock proteins, changes in liver ultrastructure, and alterations of fish behavior: Are these biomarkers related and are they useful to reflect the state of pollution in the field?,’, J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recov. 6, 57–73.Google Scholar
  34. van Gestel, C. A. M. and van Brummelen, T.C.: 1996, ‘ Incorporation of the biomarker concept in ecotoxicology calls for a redefinition of terms,’, Ecotoxicology 5, 217–225.Google Scholar
  35. Webb, D. and Gagnon, M.: 2002, ‘Biomarkers of exposure in fish inhabit ing the Swan-Canning Estuary, Western Australia – a preliminary study,’, J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recov. 9, 259-269.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Hallare
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • R. Pagulayan
    • 3
  • N. Lacdan
    • 2
  • H.-R. Köhler
    • 1
  • R. Triebskorn
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Animal Physiological EcologyUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of the Philippines ManilaPhilippines
  3. 3.Institute of BiologyUniversity of the Philippines DilimanPhilippines
  4. 4.Steinbeis Transfer-Center for Ecotoxicology and EcophysiologyRottenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations