Advertisement

The Strange Career of the Ringelmann Smoke Chart

  • Frank Uekoetter
Article

Abstract

The Ringelmann smoke chart was used in the United States to assess smoke emissions in the early twentieth century. In fact, it may have been the most important method for measuring air pollution between the late 1800s and the environmental era. However, the popularity of the Ringelmann chart stood in stark contrast to its lack of precision, which smoke abatement experts recognized and discussed among themselves. However, the critique of the Ringelmann scale rarely left the circle of experts and never jeopardized its use. This article discusses the reasons for this striking phenomenon, pointing out that the Ringelmann chart had strong practical and symbolic advantages: it allowed smoke abatement to be conducted in a public and transparent way. With that, the history of the Ringelmann smoke chart is an instructive model for the social construction of measuring techniques.

Keywords

air pollution measurements coal smoke Ringelmann chart Ringelmann scale smoke abatement smoke nuisance social construction of measurement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assembly of the State of California: 1953, Report of the Subcommittee of the Assembly Interim Committee on Governmental Efficiency and Economy Relative to a Study and Analysis of the Facts Pertaining to Air Pollution Control in Los Angeles County.Google Scholar
  2. Azbe, V. J.: 1930,‘Smoke abatement progress’, Power Plant Eng. 34, 1102–1104.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, E. G.: 1910,‘Smoke Abatement in New England, 1910’, E.G. Bailey Papers, Box 2, Hagley Library, Wilmington, Delaware, Accession 2092, p. 1.Google Scholar
  4. Barkley, J. F.: 1951,‘Air-pollution prevention in the United States’, Mech. Eng. 73, 284–288.Google Scholar
  5. Barr, W. M.: 1901, A Catechism on the Combustion of Coal and the Prevention of Smoke: A Practical Treatise, N.W. Henley & Company, New York, 349 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Benner, R. C.: 1912a,‘The smoke investigation of the Industrial Research Department of the University of Pittsburgh’, Ind. World 46, 1270–1273.Google Scholar
  7. Benner, R. C.: 1912b,‘Smoke Abatement in Pittsburgh’, in. Coal Smoke Abatement Society (ed.), Papers Read at the Smoke Abatement Conference March 26–28, 1912, London, pp. 81–83.Google Scholar
  8. Benner, R. C. (ed): 1913, Papers on the Effect of Smoke on Building Materials, Mellon Institute of Industrial Research and School of Specific Industries, Smoke Investigation Bulletin No. 6, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  9. Breckenridge, L. P.: 1907, How to Burn Illinois Coal Without Smoke, University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station, Bulletin 15, Urbana.Google Scholar
  10. Bundesgesetzblatt, 1997, part 1, p. 498.Google Scholar
  11. Chambers, J. W.: 1980, The Tyranny of Change: America in the Progressive Era, 1900–1917, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 280 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Christy, W. G.: 1949,‘Let’s make air pollution control effective’, Am. City 64, 78–79.Google Scholar
  13. Christy, W. G.: 1960,‘History of the air pollution control association’, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 10, 126–137, 174.Google Scholar
  14. Citizens’ Smoke Abatement League: 1926, Minutes of Meetings 1926–1934, Executive Committee Meeting, April 30, Scrapbook File, Missouri Historical Society, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  15. Committee on Fuel Supply of the Boston Chamber of Commerce: 1910, Smoke Abatement, Boston Chamber of Commerce, Boston, 11 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, H. N.: 1931,‘The air pollution problem’, Natl. Electric Light Assoc. Proc. 88, 103–106.Google Scholar
  17. Feldhaus, G. and Hansel, H. D.: 1971, Umweltschutz. Luftreinhaltung, Lärmbekämpfung. Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften des Bundes und der Länder mit einer systematischen Einführung (Cologne).Google Scholar
  18. Filene, P. G.: 1970,‘An obituary for‘The Progressive Movement’, Am. Quart. 22, 20–34.Google Scholar
  19. Flagg, S. B.: 1912, Smoke Abatement and City Smoke Ordinances, US Bureau of Mines Bulletin 49, Washington.Google Scholar
  20. Gibbons, J. O. G.: 1928,‘Does the public really want smoke eliminated?’, Power Plant Eng. 32, 792.Google Scholar
  21. Hebley, H. F.: 1947,‘Factors rarely considered in smoke abatement’, Mech. Eng. 69, 281–287.Google Scholar
  22. Hebley, H. F.: 1948, 1949,‘Technological factors in relation to some legal aspects of smoke control’, Univ. Pittsburgh Law Rev. 10, 505–510.Google Scholar
  23. Hodges, J. M.: 1939,‘The Ringelmann Chart Method of Determining Smoke Violations’, in: Smoke Prevention Association, Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Convention, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, June 13–16, 1939, pp. 114–119.Google Scholar
  24. Hünemörder, K.: 2001, Die Frühgeschichte der globalen Umweltkrise und die Formierung der deutschen Umweltpolitik (1940–1973), Ph.D., University of Kiel.Google Scholar
  25. Illinois Manufacturers’ Association: 1962, Statement, Special Joint Technical Committee, Chicago Association of Commerce and Industry and Illinois Manufacturers’ Association, December 31, p. 6, box 106, folder 20, Chicago Historical Society.Google Scholar
  26. Illinois Manufacturers’ Association: 1966, Illinois Manufacturers’ Association to Members of the IMA Clean Air and Water Committee and Other Interested Parties, May 10, p. 4, Box 108, Folder 2, Chicago Historical Society.Google Scholar
  27. Illinois Manufacturers’ Association: 1968, Statement of Orville V. Bergren, Secretary, Illinois Manufacturers’ Association Before the Committee on Health, Chicago City Council, February 16, p. 5, Box 109, Folder 1, Chicago Historical Society,Google Scholar
  28. Illinois Manufacturers’ Association: 1970, Statement Pertaining to Proposed Chapter II, Rules for Controlling Existing Pollution, and Chapter III, Rules for Control of Emissions from New Equipment, Air Pollution Control Board Public Hearing, Chicago, April 7, p. 4, Box 109, Folder 3, Chicago Historical Society.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, A. J. and Auth, G. H. (eds): 1951, Fuels and Combustion Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, 915 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Kudlich, R.: 1936, Ringelmann Smoke Chart, US Bureau of Mines Information Circular 6888, n. l.Google Scholar
  31. Lamping, F. H.: 1935,‘Standardization of Measuring Atmospheric Pollution’, in: Smoke Prevention Association, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Convention, St. Louis, Missouri, June 4–7, 1935, pp. 72–75.Google Scholar
  32. Landesanstalt für Immissions- und Bodennutzungsschutz des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen: 1968, Landeshauptarchiv Koblenz Bestand 930, No. 10320, Schulungsprogramm “Immissionsschutz” 1968, p. 2.Google Scholar
  33. Link, A. S. and McCormick, R. L.: 1983, Progressivism, Harlan Davidson, Inc., Arlington Heights, pp. 149.Google Scholar
  34. MacLaurin, R. D.: 1929,‘Abating black smoke will not solve the problem of atmospheric pollution’, Am. City 40, 135–137.Google Scholar
  35. Marsh, A.: 1947, Smoke: The Problem of Coal and the Atmosphere, Faber and Faber, London, pp. 306.Google Scholar
  36. Meldau, R.: 1926, Der Industriestaub: Wesen und Bekämpfung, Berlin.Google Scholar
  37. Meldau, R.: 1929,‘Übersicht über Stand und Aufgaben der Staubmeßtechnik. Bericht an den Fachausschußfür Staubtechnik beim VDI’, Die Meßtechnik 5, 66–69.Google Scholar
  38. Mitteilungen aus der Praxis des Dampfkessel- und Dampfmaschinen-Betriebes: 1903, 26, p. 159.Google Scholar
  39. Monnett, O.: 1923, Smoke Abatement, US Bureau of Mines Technical Paper 273, Washington.Google Scholar
  40. Monnett, O. et al.: 1926, Smoke-Abatement Investigation at Salt Lake City, Utah, Bureau of Mines Bulletin 254, Washington.Google Scholar
  41. Monnett, O.: 1941,‘Smoke ordinances’, Ind. Eng. Chem. 33, 839–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Obermeyer, H.: 1933, Stop That Smoke!, Harper & Brothers, New York and London, 289 pp.Google Scholar
  43. O’Connor, J. J., Jr.: 1913a, The Economic Cost of the Smoke Nuisance to Pittsburgh, Mellon Institute of Industrial Research and School of Specific Industries, Smoke Investigation Bulletin No. 4, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  44. O’Connor, J. J., Jr.: 1913b,‘The smoke investigation of the University of Pittsburgh’, Ind. World 47, 132–133.Google Scholar
  45. O’Connor, J. J.: 1915, letter to W. F. M. Goss, December 10, Archives of Industrial Society, University of Pittsburgh, 83:7 Ser. I FF 21.Google Scholar
  46. Randall, D. T.: 1908, The Burning of Coal without Smoke in Boiler Plants: A Preliminary Report, United States Geological Survey Bulletin 334, Washington.Google Scholar
  47. Ringelmann, M.: 1898,‘Méthode d’estimation des fumées Produites Par Les Foyers Industriels’, La Revue Technique 19, 268–271.Google Scholar
  48. Rodgers, D. T.: 1982,‘In search of progressivism’, Rev. Am. History 10, 113–132.Google Scholar
  49. Rooney, M. A.: 1915,‘Ordinances for smoke abatement’, Am. City 13, 316–317.Google Scholar
  50. Smoke Prevention Association: 1915, Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Convention, September 8–10.Google Scholar
  51. State of California, The Resources Agency: 1969, Air Pollution Control in California: 1968 Annual Report – Air Resources Board, January 1969.Google Scholar
  52. Stern, A. C.: 1945,‘Atmospheric pollution due to smoke’, Heating Ventilating 42, 67–70.Google Scholar
  53. Strong, W. W.: 1911/12,‘Über die wissenschaftliche Behandlung der Rauchfrage’, Rauch und Staub 2, 65–66.Google Scholar
  54. Stradling, D.: 1999, Smokestacks and Progressives: Environmentalists, Engineers, and Air Quality in America, 1881–1951, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 270 pp.Google Scholar
  55. Straub, A. A.: 1914, Some Engineering Phases of Pittsburgh’s Smoke Problem, Mellon Institute of Industrial Research and School of Specific Industries, Smoke Investigation Bulletin No. 8, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  56. Tucker, R. R.: 1945, 1946,‘A smoke elimination program that works’, Heating Piping Air Conditioning 17, 463–469, 519–523, 605–610, 605–610; 18(1) 99–105; 18(2) 102–104.Google Scholar
  57. Tucker, R. R.: 1949, letter to J. C. Kimbrough, June 27, Raymond R. Tucker Smoke Abatement Collection, Series 3, Box 1, Folder “Kingsport, Tennessee,” Washington University Archives, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  58. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers: 1990, 21, 97–99.Google Scholar
  59. Uekoetter, F.: 1999,‘Divergent responses to identical problems: Businessmen and the smoke nuisance in Germany and the United States, 1880–1917’, Business History Rev. 73, 641–676.Google Scholar
  60. Wallin, J. E. W.: 1913, Psychological Aspects of the Problem of Atmospheric Smoke Pollution, Mellon Institute of Industrial Research and School of Specific Industries, Smoke Investigation Bulletin No. 3, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  61. Whittaker, H. A. et al.: 1948,‘Air pollution’, Am. J. Public Health Nation’s Health 38, 761–769.Google Scholar
  62. Wiethaup, H.: 1963, Schutz vor Luftverunreinigungen, Geräuschen und Erschütterungen. Immissions- schutzgesetz Nordrhein-Westfalen, Herne and Berlin.Google Scholar
  63. Zeitschrift des Bayerischen Revisions-Vereins 7 (1903), p. 15.Google Scholar
  64. Zeitschrift des Bayerischen Revisions-Vereins 7 (1903), p. 15.Google Scholar
  65. Zellner, K. J.: 1915,‘The smoke nuisance’, Natl. Municipal Rev. 4, 97–98.Google Scholar
  66. Zimmermann, E.: 1931,‘Messung von Flugstaub in Rauchgasen’, Zeitschrift Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure 75, 481–486.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fakultät für Geschichtswissenschaft, Philosophie und Theologie, Abteilung GeschichtswissenschaftUniversität BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations