Community Participation in Natural Resources Management: Reality or Rhetoric?
- 483 Downloads
In the developing world, the term ‘participation’ has in recent years become a household word in the same way that ‘democracy’ or ‘gender’ have. Development agencies are demanding increased participation in their programmes. The use of the word or its application has become a centre of debate. Due to the difficulties involved in measuring ‘participation’ or indeed determining levels at which participation should take place, who participates and when, many ‘doubting Thomases’ have questioned its effectiveness. It has, however been acknowledged in many areas that popular participation changes policies and enhances management and governance. In complex issues of natural resources management, participatory techniques have helped communities develop collective responsibilities towards management of their resources and projects. This paper discusses the complexities of community participation in natural resources management, ranging from interrelations among stakeholders to resource ownership based on the experiences in the Kasanka Game Management Area (KGMA).
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Environmental Conservation Association of Zambia (ECAZ): 1999, Report on the Kasanka National Park Game Management Area Community Based Natural Resources Management Field Survey.Google Scholar
- Iied: 2001, PLA notes – General issues Google Scholar
- IUCN: 1995, Progress Report on the Preparation of a Management Plan for Kasanka National Park and Kafinda Game Management Area.Google Scholar
- Mutamba, E.: 2001, Participation: Can the Rhetoric be Translated into its Practical Reality? Google Scholar
- State of the Environment in Zambia (2000).Google Scholar