Advertisement

Hot topic prediction considering influence and expertise in social media

  • Kyoungsoo Bok
  • Yeonwoo Noh
  • Jongtae Lim
  • Jaesoo YooEmail author
Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

The hot topic detection designed to identify the recent issues and trends employs the analysis of real-time social media activities. The existing schemes suffer from low precision because they focus on keyword occurrence frequency in documents written by the unspecified majority. The existing schemes are incapable of predicting near-future hot topics as they are intended to detect hot topics at a particular time. We propose a new hot topic prediction scheme considering users’ influence and expertise in social media. The proposed scheme detects expected near-future hot topics by extracting a set of candidate keywords from social-media posts using the modified TF-IDF. The hot topic prediction index is calculated for each candidate keyword based on the influence and expertise of users who include it in their posts and hot topic predictions are performed based on the change rate over time. Finally, a comparison between existing and proposed hot topic detection schemes demonstrates the proposed scheme’s superiority.

Keywords

Hot topic Social media TF-IDF Influence Expertise Prediction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIP) (No. 2016R1A2B3007527), by “Human Resources Program in Energy Technology” of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea. (No. 20164030201330), and by Next-Generation Information Computing Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT (No. NRF-2017M3C4A7069432).

References

  1. 1.
    Pee, L. G. (2018). Affordances for sharing domain-specific and complex knowledge on enterprise social media. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Derczynski, L., Yang, B., & Jensen, C. S. (2013). Towards context-aware search and analysis on social media data. In International conference on extending database technology, March 18–22, Genoa, Italy.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anandhan, A., Shuib, N. L. M., Ismail, M. A., & Shaikh, G. M. (2018). Social media recommender systems: Review and open research issues. IEEE Access, 6, 15608–15628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sperlì, G., Amato, F., Mercorio, F., Mezzanzanica, M., Moscato, V., & Picariello, A. (2018). A social media recommender system. International Journal of Multimedia Data Engineering and Management, 9(1), 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duchateau, F. (2011). Who can best answer a query in my social network? In International conference on data engineering workshops, April 11–16, Hannover, Germany.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ehrlich, K., & Shami, N. S. (2008). Searching for expertise. In Conference on human factors in computing systems, April 5–10, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sibona, C., Cummings, J., & Scott, J. (2017). Predicting social networking sites continuance intention through alternative services. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(6), 1127–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, H., Bok, K. S., & Yoo, J. S. (2015). A mobile social network for efficient contents sharing and searches. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 41, 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Said, A., Luca, E. W. D., & Albayrak, S. (2010). How social relationships affect user similarities. In Workshop on social recommender systems, February 7–10, Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mislove, A., Viswanath, B., Gummadi, P. K., & Druschel, P. (2010). You are who you know: Inferring user profiles in online social networks. In ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, February 4–6, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Phethean, C., Tiropanis, T., & Harris, L. (2015). Engaging with charities on social media: Comparing Interaction on Facebook and Twitter. In International conference on internet science, May 27–29, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In International conference on World Wide Web, April 26–30, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dong, T., Cheng, N., & Wu, Y. J. (2014). A study of the social networking website service in digital content industries: The Facebook case in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 708–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guo, C., Li, B., & Tian, X. (2016). Flickr group recommendation using rich social media information. Neurocomputing, 204, 8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oh, S., & Syn, S. Y. (2015). Motivations for sharing information and social support in social media: Acomparative analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr. Journal of the Association forInformation Science and Technology, 66(10), 2045–2060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Faruque, S. A., Khatun, M. A., & Rahman, M. S. (2016). Modelling direct marketing campaign on social networks. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 22(4), 422–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khater, S., Gracanin, D., & Elmongui, H. G. (2017). Personalized recommendation for online social networks information: Personal preferences and location-based community trends. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 4(3), 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keib, K., Himelboim, I., & Han, J. (2018). Important tweets matter: Predicting retweets in the #BlackLivesMatter talk on twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramaswami, C., Murugathasan, M., Narayanasamy, P., & Khoo, C. S. G. (2014). A survey of information sharing on Facebook. Information Research, 19(4).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jia, R., Liu, T., Zhang, J., Fu, L., Gan, X., & Wang, X. (2018). Impact of content popularity on information coverage in online social networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(8), 7465–7474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zheng, Y., Xie, X., & Ma, W. (2010). GeoLife: A collaborative social networking service among user, location and trajectory. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 33(2), 32–39.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiang, F. (2014). A uniform framework for community detection via influence maximization in social networks. In IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining, August 17–20, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, G. A., Jiao, J., Abrahams, A. S., Fan, W., & Zhang, Z. (2013). ExpertRank: A topic-aware expert finding algorithm for online knowledge communities. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1442–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Das, R., Kamruzzaman, J., & Karmakar, G. C. (2018). Modelling majority and expert influences on opinion formation in online social networks. World Wide Web, 21(3), 663–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang, Z., Wang, C., Zhang, F., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2015). Emerging rumor identification for social media with hot topic detection. In Web information system and application conference, September 11–13, Jinan, China.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yu, Q., Weng, W., Zhang, K., Lei, K., & Xu, K. (2014). Hot topic analysis and content mining in social media. In International performance computing and communications conference, December 5–7, Austin, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang, C., Liu, L., Lei, D., Yuan, Q., Zhuang, H., Hanratty, T., & Han, J. (2017). TrioVecEvent: Embedding-based online local event detection in geo-tagged tweet streams. In ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, August 13–17, Halifax, NS, Canada.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Katragadda, S., Benton, R. G., & Raghavan, V. V. (2017). Framework for real-time event detection using multiple social media sources. In International conference on system sciences, January 4–7, Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lin, S., Kong, X., & Yu, P. S. (2013). Predicting trends in social networks via dynamic activeness model. In ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, October 27–November 1, San Francisco, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Han, Y., Fang, B., & Jia, Y. (2014). Predicting the topic influence trends in social media with multiple models. Neurocomputing, 144, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhu, T., & Yu, J. (2014). A prerecognition model for hot topic discovery based on microblogging data. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1–11.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim, H., Lee, S., & Kyeong, S. (2013). Discovering hot topics using Twitter streaming data. In International conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining, August 25–29, Niagara, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ruan, Y., Purohit, H., Fuhry, D., Parthasarathy, S., & Sheth, A. (2012). Prediction of topic volume on Twitter. In International ACM conference on web science, June 22–24, Evanston, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jeelani, H., & Singh, K. (2014). ‘Good’ versus ‘bad’ opinion on micro blogging networks: Polarity classification of Twitter. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 3(8), 49–56.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yu, R., Zhao, M., Chang, P., & He, M. (2014). Online hot topic detection from web news archive in short terms. In International conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery, August 19–21, Xiamen, China.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Aizawa, A. N. (2003). An information-theoretic perspective of TF-IDF measures. Information Processing and Management, 39(1), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval (pp. 109–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Twitter Streaming API. https://dev.twitter.com/streaming/overview. Accessed 12 August, 2014.
  39. 39.
    HanNanum Korean Morphological Analyzer. http://semanticweb.kaist.ac.kr/home/index.php/HanNanum. Accessed 24 November, 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information and Communication EngineeringChungbuk National UniversityCheongjuKorea

Personalised recommendations