The role of dimensions of perceived risk in adoption of corporate internet banking by customers in Iran

Article
  • 128 Downloads

Abstract

During the recent years, one of the issues considered by the banks in the field of internet banking is the adoption of corporate internet banking (CIB) by corporate clients. The present article tried to examine the factors affecting adoption of CIB by corporate clients based on the perceived risk theory. The research hypotheses were tested using confirmatory factor analysis and the results showed that there was a significant relationship between all the risks and intent to adopt CIB by the corporate clients of the banks. The major factors decreasing the intent to adopt internet banking include performance, privacy, security, financial, time, and social risks respectively. Based on the findings of the present study and similar studies, a comparison was made between the importance of the dimensions of perceived risk in personal and CIB and suggestions were made for decreasing the effects of these significant risks for the corporate clients to adopt CIB.

Keywords

Corporate internet banking Adoption of technology Corporate clients Perceived risk theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Abeka, S. O., Abeka, E. O., & Omondi, O. C. (2012). Determinants of Adoption of internet banking by trade finance customers in East Africa. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 2(2), 109–119.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alam, S. S., Musa, R., & Hassan, F. (2009). Corporate customers’ adoption of Internet banking: case of Klang Valley business firm in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(4), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aldas-Manzano, J., Lassala-Navarre, C., Ruiz-Mafe, C., & Sanz-Blas, S. (2009). The role of consumer innovativeness and perceived risk in online banking usage. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(1), 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alnsour, M. S., & Al-Hyari, K. (2011). Internet banking and Jordanian corporate customers: issues of security and trust. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 16(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Batra, R., & Sinha, I. (2000). Consumer-level factors moderating the success of private label brands. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bestavros, A. (2000). Banking industry walks ‘tightrope’ in personalization of web services. Bank Systems and Technology, 37(1), 54–56.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Butler, R. (2007). A framework of anti-phishing measures aimed at protecting the online consumer’s identity. The Electronic Library, 25(5), 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, W. H. (2014). Determinants of internet banking adoption by corporate customers: A study of behavioral intentions in Taiwanese businesses. Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick. wrap.warwick.ac.uk/61915/1/WRAP_THESIS_Chen_2014.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2016.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng, T. C., Lam, D. Y., & Yeung, A. C. (2006). Adoption of internet banking: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1558–1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Claro, D. P., & Rosa, R. B. (2016). Drivers leading firm adoption of internet banking services. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 34(3), 336–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eriksson, K., Kerem, K., & Nilsson, D. (2008). The adoption of commercial innovations in the former Central and Eastern European markets. The case of internet banking in Estonia. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(3), 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grabner-Kräuter, S., & Faullant, R. (2008). Consumer acceptance of internet banking: The influence of internet trust. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(7), 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hanafizadeh, P., & Khedmatgozar, H. R. (2012). The mediating role of the dimensions of the perceived risk in the effect of customers’ awareness on the adoption of Internet banking in Iran. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanafizadeh, P., Keating, B. W., & Khedmatgozar, H. R. (2014). A systematic review of Internet banking adoption. Telematics and Informatics, 31(3), 492–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk. Advances in Consumer Research, 3(3), 382–383.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jagero, N., & Abeka, S. O. (2011). Corporate customers usage of internet banking in East Africa. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 8(5), 394–402.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jaruwachirathanakul, B., & Fink, D. (2005). Internet banking adoption strategies for a developing country: The case of Thailand. Internet Research, 15(3), 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalakota, R., & Whinston, A. (1997). Electronic commerce: A manager’s guide. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaplan, L. B., Szybillo, G. J., & Jacoby, J. (1974). Components of perceived risk in product purchase: A cross validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(3), 278–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kesharwani, A., & Radhakrishna, G. (2013). Drivers and inhibitors of internet banking adoption in India. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 18(3), 18. http://www.icommercecentral.com/open-access/drivers-and-inhibitors-of-internet-banking-adoption-in-india-1-18.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2016.
  24. 24.
    Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kunnan, A. J. (1998). An introduction to structural equation modelling for language assessment research. Language Testing, 15(3), 295–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee, M. C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Littler, D., & Melanthiou, D. (2006). Consumer perceptions of risk and uncertainty and the implications for behaviour towards innovative retail services: The case of internet banking. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(6), 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marche, S., & McNiven, J. D. (2003). E-government and e-governance: The future isn’t what it used to be. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moradi, M., Ghomian, M. M., & Sarjanian, Z. (2012). Investigation of the effect of customers’ perceived risk and uncertainty on the usage of the internet banking (A Case Study of Saderat Bank of Mashhad). World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(5), 617–623.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mukherjee, A., & Nath, P. (2003). A model of trust in online relationship banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nasri, W. (2011). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking in Tunisia. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(8), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Olatokun, W., & Owoeye, O. J. (2012). Influence of individual, organizational and system factors on attitude of online banking users. In Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE). http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/1662?Type=ConferenceProceedings&ConferenceID=42. Accessed May 25, 2016.
  34. 34.
    Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 69–103.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Polasik, M., & Piotr Wisniewski, T. (2009). Empirical analysis of internet banking adoption in Poland. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(1), 32–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rawashdeh, A. (2015). Factors affecting adoption of internet banking in Jordan: Chartered accountant’s perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(4), 510–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rotchanakitumnuai, S., & Speece, M. (2003). Barriers to internet banking adoption: A qualitative study among corporate customers in Thailand. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(6/7), 312–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rotchanakitumnuai, S., & Speece, M. (2004). Corporate customer perspectives on business value of Thai internet banking. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 5(4), 270–286.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rotchanakitumnuai, S., & Speece, M. (2005). The impact of web-based service on switching cost: Evidence from Thai internet banking. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic commerce. doi:10.1145/1089551.1089555.
  42. 42.
    Roy, S. K., Balaji, M. S., Kesharwani, A., & Sekhon, H. (2016). Predicting Internet banking adoption in India: A perceived risk perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2016.1148771.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Osterlind, S. J. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Peasron.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tan, B. (2002). Understanding consumer ethical decision making with respect to purchase of pirated software. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(2), 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tryfos, P. (1996). Sampling methods for applied research: Text and cases. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Westland, J. C. (2015). Structural equation models. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yiu, C. S., Grant, Y. K., & Edgar, D. (2007). Factors affecting the adoption of Internet banking in Hong Kong: Implications for the banking sector. International Journal of Information Management, 27(5), 336–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yoon, H. S., & Barker Steege, L. M. (2013). Development of a quantitative model of the impact of customers’ personality and perceptions on Internet banking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1133–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yousafzai, S., Pallister, J., & Foxall, G. (2009). Multi-dimensional role of trust in internet banking adoption. The Service Industries Journal, 29(5), 591–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zhao, A. L., Hanmer-Lloyd, S., Ward, P., & Goode, M. M. H. (2008). Perceived risk and Chinese consumers’ internet banking services adoption. International Journal of Bank marketing, 26(7), 505–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IRANDOC)TehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Financial EngineeringUniversity of Science and CultureTehranIran

Personalised recommendations