Advertisement

Electronic Commerce Research

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 31–50 | Cite as

The determinants of online customer ratings: a combined domain ontology and topic text analytics approach

  • Runyu Chen
  • Wei XuEmail author
Article

Abstract

Merchants, as well as customers, have noticed the importance of online product reviews and numeric ratings in electronic commerce websites. It is valuable if merchants can discover some potential customer value from the sheer volume of data. This paper contributes a semantic text analytics approach that can dig out the customers’ most basic concerns about their online purchase choices. More specifically, based on the hypothesis that the product reviews and overall ratings estimated by same person in a tiny time interval have a great relevance, we dexterously utilize this relevance to realize the embedded customer value. In the proposed method, take the single lens reflex camera for example, an innovative aspect extraction method that comprehensively considers the product ontology and results of the topic modeling method latent Dirichlet allocation is applied. As a result, 8 specific aspects are identified from the experimental results. For each aspect, a self-contained review feature corpus is created as an extension of some seed terms. After aspect-based sentence segmentation and context-sensitive sentiments preprocessing, aspect-oriented sentiment analysis is applied. Multiple regression analysis is then used as a statistical measure to discover determinant aspects of overall ratings. The results reveal that cost performance, image quality and product integrity are the three most influential aspects. The practical implication of our research is that merchants can efficiently modify their products, to satisfy more customers and also boost sales performance.

Keywords

Customer ratings Big data Text analytics Aspect-oriented sentiment analysis Customer value E-commerce 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research work was partly supported by 973 Project (Grant No. 2012CB316205), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91224008 and 71301163), Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education (No. 14YJA630075 and 15YJA630068), Beijing Nova Program (No. Z131101000413058), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the Research Funds of Renmin University of China (No. 10XNK159, and No. 15XNLQ08).

References

  1. 1.
    Horrigan, J. (2008). Online shopping. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Online-Shopping.aspx. Accessed 13 Feb 2008.
  2. 2.
    Huberman, B. A., & Asur, S. (2010). Predicting the future with social media. Palo Alto, CA: HP labs.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D., & Preece, J. (2006). Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behaviour. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Litvin, W. S., Goldsmith, E. R., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trusov, M., Bucklin, E. R., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Bruyn, A., & Lilien, G. L. (2008). A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: the moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheung, C. M., Xiao, B. S., & Liu, I. L. (2014). Do actions speak louder than voices? The signaling role of social information cues in influencing consumer purchase decisions. Decision Support Systems, 65, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gao, J., Zhang, C., Wang, K., & Ba, S. (2012). Understanding online purchase decision making: The effects of unconscious thought, information quality, and information quantity. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 772–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robinson, R., Goh, T. T., & Zhang, R. (2012). Textual factors in online product reviews: a foundation for a more influential approach to opinion mining. Electronic Commerce Research,. doi: 10.1007/s10660-012-9095-7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sotiriadis, M. D., & van Zyl, C. (2013). Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: The use of twitter by tourists. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hu, M. & Liu, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 168–177). ACM.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu, J., Wang, H., Zhu, M., Tsou, B. K., & Ma, M. (2011). Aspect-based opinion polling from customer reviews. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2(1), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Titov, I., & McDonald, R. T. (2008). A joint model of text and aspect ratings for sentiment summarization. In ACL (Vol. 8, pp. 308–316).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moghaddam, S. & Ester, M. (2013). The FDA model for aspect-based opinion mining: Addressing the cold start problem. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 909–918). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mukherjee, A. & Liu, B. (2012). Aspect extraction through semi-supervised modeling. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers-Volume 1 (pp. 339–348). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hu, M. & Liu, B. (2004). Mining opinion features in customer reviews. In AAAI (Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 755–760).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jo, Y. & Oh, A. H. (2011). Aspect and sentiment unification model for online review analysis. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 815–824). ACM.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomas, M., Pang, B. & Lee, L. (2006). Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 327–335). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Esuli, A. & Sebastiani, F. (2005). Determining the semantic orientation of terms through gloss classification. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 617–624). ACM.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilson, T., Hoffmann, P., Somasundaran, S., Kessler, J., Wiebe, J., Choi, Y., et al. (2005). OpinionFinder: A system for subjectivity analysis. In Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP on Interactive Demonstrations (pp. 34–35). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wei, W. & Gulla, J. A. (2010). Sentiment learning on product reviews via sentiment ontology tree. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 404–413). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen, P. Y., Wu, S. Y., & Yoon, J. (2004). The impact of online recommendations and consumer feedback on sales. In ICIS 2004 Proceedings, (p. 58).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J., Pure, R., & Markov, A. (2011). User-generated ratings and the evaluation of credibility and product quality in ecommerce transactions. In 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). IEEE.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, Y. L., Chin, K. S., & Luo, X. G. (2012). Determining the final priority ratings of customer requirements in product planning by MDBM and BSC. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 1243–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sun, M. (2012). How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Science, 58(4), 696–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen, P. Y., Dhanasobhon, S., & Smith, M. D. (2008). All reviews are not created equal: The disaggregate impact of reviews and reviewers at Amazon.com. SSRN Electronic Journal, 10(11), 396–401.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    De Maeyer, P. D. (2012). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales and price strategies: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(2), 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J., Pure, R., Markov, A., & Hartsell, E. (2014). Mitigating risk in ecommerce transactions: Perceptions of information credibility and the role of user-generated ratings in product quality and purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research, 14(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Infosino, W. J. (1986). Forecasting new product sales from likelihood of purchase ratings. Marketing Science, 5(4), 372–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yang, J., & Mai, E. S. (2010). Experiential goods with network externalities effects: An empirical study of online rating system. Journal of Business Research, 63(9), 1050–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gan, Q. W. & Yu, Y. (2015). Restaurant rating: industrial standard and word-of-mouth: a text mining and multi-dimensional sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (pp. 1332–1340).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qu, Z., Zhang, H., & Li, H. (2008). Determinants of online merchant rating: Content analysis of consumer comments about Yahoo merchants. Decision Support Systems, 46(1), 440–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koh, N. S., Hu, N., & Clemons, E. K. (2010). Do online reviews reflect a product’s true perceived quality? An investigation of online movie reviews across cultures. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(5), 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Griffin, A., Gleason, G., Preiss, R., & Shevenaugh, D. (2012). Best practice for customer satisfaction in manufacturing firms. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 87.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gu, B., & Ye, Q. (2014). First step in social media: Measuring the influence of online management responses on customer satisfaction. Production and Operations Management, 23(4), 570–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thirumalai, S., & Sinha, K. K. (2011). Customization of the online purchase process in electronic retailing and customer satisfaction: An online field study. Journal of Operations Management, 29(5), 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weinberger, M. G., & Dillon, W. R. (1980). The effects of unfavourable product rating information. Advances in Consumer Research, 7(1), 528–532.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., & Riedl, J. (1994). GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 175–186). ACM.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hu, N., Pavlou, P. A., & Zhang, J. (2006). Can online reviews reveal a product’s true quality? Empirical findings and analytical modeling of Online word-of-mouth communication. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 324–330). ACM.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cheng, X., & Zhou, M. (2010). Empirical study on credibility of electronic word of mouth. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science (MASS), (pp. 1–4).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hadar, I., Soffer, P., & Kenzi, K. (2014). The role of domain knowledge in requirements elicitation via interviews: An exploratory study. Requirements Engineering, 19(2), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Matthews, S. S., & Lawley, M. (2006). Improving customer service: issues in customer contact management. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brotherton, J. M., Liu, B., Donovan, B., Kaldor, J. M., & Saville, M. (2014). Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage in young Australian women is higher than previously estimated: Independent estimates from a nationally representative mobile phone survey. Vaccine, 32(5), 592–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lawrence, A., & Francis, B. (2006). Customer retention management processes: A quantitative study. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Liu, H. C., Jeng, B. C., Mai, Y. T., Jheng, Y. D., & Lin, H. T. (2014). Design of online survey system with an advanced IPA discrimination index for customer satisfaction assessment. Electronic Commerce Research, 14(3), 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tison, J., Chaudhary, N., & Cosgrove, L. (2011). National phone survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors (No. HS-811 555).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gerdes, J., Jr., Stringam, B. B., & Brookshire, R. G. (2008). An integrative approach to assess qualitative and quantitative consumer feedback. Electronic Commerce Research, 8(4), 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Park, D. H., & Lee, J. (2009). eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 386–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Burgess, L., Parish, B., & Alcock, C. (2011). To what extent are regional tourism organizations (RTOs) in Australia leveraging the benefits of web technology for destination marketing and eCommerce. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(3), 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mizerski, R. W. (1982). An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavorable information. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kim, S. M., & Hovy, E. (2004). Determining the sentiment of opinions. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (p. 1367), Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lee, T., & Bradlow, E. T. (2007). Automatic construction of conjoint attributes and levels from online customer reviews. University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School Working Paper.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Liu, B., Hu, M., & Cheng, J. (2005). Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 342–351). ACM.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Singh, J., & Pandya, S. (1991). Exploring the effects of consumers’ dissatisfaction level on complaint behaviours. European Journal of Marketing, 25(9), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chiou, J. S., & Cheng, C. (2003). Should a company have message boards on its web sites? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(3), 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2007). Designing novel review ranking systems: predicting the usefulness and impact of reviews. In Proceedings of the ninth International Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 303–310). ACM.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce, 11(2), 23–25.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Long, C., Zhang, J. & Zhut, X. (2010). A review selection approach for accurate feature rating estimation. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 766–774), Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chi, Y. L. (2007). Elicitation synergy of extracting conceptual tags and hierarchies in textual document. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R. W., Noy, N. F. & Musen, M. A. (2004). The Protégé OWL plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. In The Semantic Web–ISWC 2004, (pp. 229–243).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhang, H. P., & Liu, Q. (2002). ICTCLAS. Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences: http://www.ict.ac.cn/freeware/003_ictclas.asp.
  67. 67.
    Wang, T., Cai, Y., Leung, H. F., Lau, R. Y., Li, Q., & Min, H. (2014). Product aspect extraction supervised with online domain knowledge. Knowledge-Based Systems, 71, 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(1), 5228–5235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Subrahmanian, V. S., & Reforgiato, D. (2008). AVA: adjective-verb-adverb combinations for sentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 23(4), 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lau, R. Y., Song, D., Li, Y., Cheung, T. C., & Hao, J. X. (2009). Toward a fuzzy domain ontology extraction method for adaptive e-learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(6), 800–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lau, R. Y., Bruza, P. D., & Song, D. (2008). Towards a belief-revision-based adaptive and context-sensitive information retrieval system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 26(2), 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zhu, Y. L., Min, J., Zhou, Y. Q., Huang, X. J., & Wu, L. D. (2006). Semantic orientation computing based on HowNet. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 20(1), 14–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of InformationRenmin University of ChinaBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Smart City Research CenterRenmin University of ChinaBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations