Advertisement

Electronic Commerce Research

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 255–288 | Cite as

Trust and risk in consumer acceptance of e-services

  • Jian Mou
  • Dong-Hee Shin
  • Jason F. Cohen
Article

Abstract

Consumers’ risk perception and trust are considered among the most important psychological states that influence online behavior. Despite the number of empirical studies that have explored the effects of trust and risk perceptions on consumer acceptance of e-services, the field remains fragmented and the posited research models are contradictory. To address this problem, we examined how trust and risk influence consumer acceptance of e-services through a meta-analysis of 67 studies, followed by tests of competing causal models. The findings confirm that trust and risk are important to e-services acceptance but that trust has a stronger effect size. We found that certain effect sizes were moderated by factors such as the consumer population under study, the type of e-service, and the object of trust under consideration. The data from the meta-analysis best supports the causal logic that positions trust as antecedent to risk perceptions. Risk partially mediates the effects of trust on acceptance.

Keywords

Trust Risk Meta-analysis Electronic service 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by Sungkyun Research Fund, Sungkyunkwan University.

References

*References marked with an asterisk refer to studies included in the MASEM analysis

  1. 1.
    * Abadi, H. R. D., Hafshejani, S. N. A., & Zadeh, F. K. (2011). Considering factors that affect users’ online purchase intentions with using structural equation modelling. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(8), 463–471.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    * AI-Jabri, I. M. (2015). The intention to use mobile banking: Further evidence from Saudi Arabia. South African Business Management, 46(1), 23–34.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    * Aloudat, A., Michael, K., Chen, X., & Al-Dei, M. (2014). Social acceptance of location-based mobile government services for emergency management. Telematics and Informatics, 31, 153–171.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets, no. price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    * Bansal, G., Zahedi, F. M., & Gefen, D. (2010). The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decision Support Systems, 49, 138–150.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bart, Y., Shankar, V., Sultan, F., & Urban, G. L. (2005). Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in E-Government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhattacherjee, A. (2002). Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211–241.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    * Bianchi, C., & Andrews, L. (2012). Risk, trust, and consumer online purchasing behaviour: A Chilean perspective. International Marketing Review, 29(3), 253–276.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bokhari, R. H. (2005). The relationship between system usage and user satisfaction: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(2), 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    * Chandra, S., Srivastava, S. C., & Theng, Y. L. (2010). Evaluating the role of trust in consumer adoption of mobile payment systems: An empirical analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27, 561–588.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., Lai, H., & Chang, C. M. (2012). Re-examining the influence of trust on online repeat purchase intention: The moderating role of habit and its antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 53, 835–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    * Cho, V. (2006). A study of the roles of trusts and risks in information-oriented online legal services using an integrated model. Information & Management, 43, 502–520.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Compeau, D., Marcolin, B., Kelley, H., & Higgins, C. (2012). Research commentary generalizability of information systems research using student subjects—A reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1093–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    * Corbitt, B. J., Thanasankit, T., & Yi, H. (2003). Trust and e-commerce: A study of consumer perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2, 203–215.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). On-line trust: Concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 737–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    * Curry, P. (2011). Consumer risk: The importance of privacy and security while connected to Wi-Fi hotspots: does location matter? In Proceedings of the 2011 AMCIS.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    * D’Alessandro, S., Girardi, A., & Tiangsoongnern, L. (2012). Perceived risk and trust as antecedents of online purchasing behavior in the USA gemstone industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 24(3), 433–460.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Kleijnen, M. (2001). Customer adoption of e-service: An experimental study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(2), 184–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    * Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An Extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61–80.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    * Dinev, T., Bellotto, M., Hart, P., Russo, V., Serra, I., & Colautti, C. (2006). Privacy calculus model in e-commerce—A study of Italy and the United States. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 389–402.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601–620.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Egea, J. M. O., & Gonzalez, M. V. R. (2011). Explaining physicians’ acceptance of EHCR systems: An extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    * Faqih, K. M. S. (2011). Integrating perceived risk and trust with technology acceptance model: An empirical assessment of customers’ acceptance of online shopping in Jordan. In Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on research and innovation in information systems, Vol. ICRIIS.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Garbarino, E., & Strahilevitz, M. (2004). Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation. Journal of Business Research, 57, 768–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gefen, D. (2002). Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers. ACM Sigmis Database, 33(3), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    * Gefen, D. (2002). Customer loyalty in e-commerce. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 3, 27–51.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gefen, D., & Heart, T. (2006). On the need to include national culture as a central issue in e-commerce trust beliefs. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(4), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    * Gefen, D., & Pavlou, P. (2006). The moderating role of perceived regulatory effectiveness of online marketplaces on the role of trust and risk on transaction intentions. In Proceedings of the 2006 ICIS (pp. 1313–1330).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gefen, D., V. Rao, & N. Tractinsky. (2003). Conceptualization of trust, risk and their relationship in electronic commerce: The need for clarifications. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii international conference on IS.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gefen, D., Rose, G. M., Warkentin, M., & Pavlou, P. (2005). Cultural diversity and trust in IT adoption: A comparison of USA and South African e-voters. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(1), 54–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    * Gurung, A. (2006). Empirical investigation of the relationship of privacy, security and trust with behavioural intention to transact in e-commerce, For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, the University of Texas at ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Harridge-March, S. (2006). Can the building of trust overcome consumer perceived risk online? Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(7), 746–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    He, J., & King, W. (2008). The role of user participation in information systems development: Implications from a meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(1), 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Holbert, R. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995–2000. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 531–551.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    * Hong, I. B. (2015). Understanding the consumer’s online merchant selection process: The roles of product involvement, perceived risk, and trust expectation. International Journal of Information Management, 35, 322–336.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    * Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computer in Human Behavior, 23, 1838–1852.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis correcting error and bias in research findings. London: New Delhi, SAGE Publicantions.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    * Hussein, R., Mohamed, N., Ahlan, A. R., & Mahumd, M. (2011). E-Government application: An integrated model on G2C adoption of online tax. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(3), 225–248.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    * Izquierdo-Yusta, A., & Galderon-Monge, E. (2011). Internet as a distribution channel: Empirical evidence from the service sector and managerial opportunities. Journal of Internet Commerce, 10, 106–127.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    * Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tracinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1), 45–71.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Joseph, D., Ng, K. Y., Koh, C., & Ang, S. (2007). Turnover of information technology professionals: A narrative review, meta-analytic structural equation modeling, and model development. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 547–577.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    * Katos, V. (2012). An integrated model for online transactions: Illuminating the black box. Information Management and Computer Security, 20(3), 184–206.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    * Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015). Blissfully ignorant: The effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Information Systems Journal, 25(6), 607–635.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    * Kehr, F., Wentzel, D., Kowatsch, R., & Fleisch, E. (2015). Rethinking privacy decisions: Pre-existing attitudes, pre-existing emotional states, and a situational privacy calculus. In Proceedings of twenty-third European conference on information systems.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kerler, W. A., & Killough, L. N. (2009). The effects of satisfaction with a client’s management during a prior audit engagement, trust, and moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    * Kesharwani, A., & Bisht, S. S. (2012). The impact of trust and perceived risk on internet banking adoption in India. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(4), 303–322.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    * Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544–564.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    * Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2009). Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 237–257.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    * Kimery, K., & McCord, M. (2002). Third-party assurances: The road to trust in online retailing. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    * Kimery, L. M., & McCord, M. (2002). Third-party assurances: Mapping the road to trust in e-retailing. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4(2), 63–82.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    King, W. R., & He, J. (2005). Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 665–686.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    * Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online social networks: Why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 109–125.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    * Lee, M. C. (2009). Predicting and explaining the adoption of online trading: An empirical study in Taiwan. Decision Support Systems, 47, 133–142.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lei, P. W., & Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(3), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    * Li, R., Kim, J. J., & Park, J. S. (2007). The effects of internet shoppers’ trust on their purchasing intention in China. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 4(3), 269–286.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    * Li, H., Ye, Q., Law, R., & Wang, Z. (2010). A purchasing-intention model in C2C e-commerce of China: The role of perceived risk, trust, perceived benefit and their antecedents. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on electronic commerce (pp. 101–109).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    * Li, H., Gupta, A., Zhang, J., & Sarathy, R. (2014). Examining the decision to use standalone personal health record systems as a trust-enabled fair social contract. Decision Support Systems, 57, 376–386.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    * Liao, C., Liu, C. C., & Chen, K. (2011). Examining the impact privacy, trust and risk perceptions beyond monetary transactions: An integrated model. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10, 702–715.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    * Lim, K. S., Lim, J. S., & Heinrichs, J. H. (2008). Testing and integrated model of e-shopping web site usage. Journal of Internet Commerce, 7(3), 291–312.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    * Lo, J. (2010). Privacy concern, locus of control, and salience in a trust-risk model of information disclosure on social networking sites. In Proceedings of the 2010 AMCIS (pp. 1–12).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    * Lorenzo-Romero, C. L., Constantinides, E., & Alarcón-del-Amo, M. C. (2011). Consumer adoption of social networking sites: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 5(2/3), 170–188.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    * Lu, Y., Yang, S., Chau, P. Y. K., & Cao, Y. (2011). Dynamics between the trust transfer process and intention to use mobile payment services: A cross-environment perspective. Information & Management, 48, 393–403.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    * Luo, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., & Shim, J. P. (2010). Examining multi-dimensional trust and multi-faceted risk in initial acceptance of emerging technologies: an empirical study of mobile banking services. Decision Support Systems, 49, 222–234.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    * Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns, Vol. IUIPC: The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    * Martínez-López, F. J., Esteban-Millat, I., Cabal, C. C., & Gengler, C. (2015). Psychological factors explaining consumer adoption of an e-vendor’s recommender. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(2), 284–310.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Meng, X., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    * Morosan, C., & DeFranco, A. (2015). Disclosing personal information via hotel apps: A privacy calculus perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 47, 120–130.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Mou, J., & Cohen, J. F. (2014). Trust, risk and perceived usefulness in consumer acceptance of online health services. In 25th Australasian conference on information systems, Auckland.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    * Nicolaou, A. I., & McKnight, D. H. (2006). Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 332–351.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Parboteeah, D. V., Valacich, J. S., & Wells, J. D. (2009). The influence of website characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Information Systems Research, 20(1), 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Park, J. K., Gunn, F., & Han, S. L. (2012). Multidimensional trust building in e-retailing: Cross-cultural differences in trust formation and implications for perceived risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19, 304–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    * Pavlou, P. A. (2001). Integrating trust in electronic commerce with the technology acceptance model: Model development and validation. In Proceedings of the 2001 AMCIS (pp. 816–822).Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    * Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2002). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. In Proceedings of the twenty-third international conference on information systems (pp. 667–675).Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    * Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37–59.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    * Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2005). Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: Antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Information Systems Research, 16(4), 372–399.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    * Phonthanukitithaworn, C., Sellitto, C., & Fong, M. (2015). User intentions to adopt mobile payment services: A study of early adopters in Thailand. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 20(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ribbink, D., van Riel, A. C. R., Liljander, V., & Streukens, S. (2004). Comfort your online customer: Quality, trust and loyalty on the internet. Managing Service Quality, 14(6), 446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Rosenthal, R. (1979). The ‘File Drawer’ problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Rust, R. T., & Kannan, P. K. (2003). E-service: A new paradigm for business in the electronic environment. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 37–42.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    * Schaupp, L. C., Carter, L., & McBride, M. E. (2010). E-file adoption: A study of U.S. taxpayers’ intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 636–644.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44, 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    * Shin, D. (2008). Understanding purchasing behaviors in a virtual economy: Consumer behavior involving virtual currency in Web 2.0 communities. Interacting with Computers, 20, 433–446.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Shin, D. (2010). The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 428–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    * Shin, D. (2013). User experience in social commerce: In friends we trust. Behavior and Information Technology, 32(1), 52–67.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Shin, D. (2015). Quality of experience: Beyond the user experience of smart services. Total Quality Management, 26(8), 919–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    * Shukla, P. (2014). The impact of organizational efforts on consumer concerns in an online context. Information & Management, 51, 113–119.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    * Slyke, C. V., Shim, J. T., Johnson, R., & Jiang, J. (2006). Concern for information privacy and online consumer purchasing. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 7(6), 415–444.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Song, H. L. (2010). Customer adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM with trust, perceived risk, and quality. In Proceedings of 2010 international conference on multimedia information networking and security (pp. 264–268).Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Taleghani, M., Sharifi, A. S., & Gilaninia, S. (2011). The role of key factors in e-banking for new enterprise, vol. concepts and applications. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(3), 999–1007.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    * Teo, T. S. H., & Liu, J. (2007). Consumer trust in e-commerce in the United States, Singapore and China. The International Journal of Management Science, 35, 22–38.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Thatcher, J. B., Carter, M., Li, X., & Rong, G. (2013). A classification and investigation of trustees in B-to-C e-commerce: General vs. specific trust. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 32, 107–134.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Van der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., & Creemers, M. (2003). Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives. European Journal of Information Systems, 12, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Verhagen, T., Meents, S., & Tan, Y. (2006). Perceived risk and trust associated with purchasing at electronic marketplaces. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 542–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modelling. Personnel Psychology, 48, 865–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Wu, J., & Lederer, A. (2009). A meta-analysis of the role of environment-based voluntariness in information technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 419–432.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    * Wu, K., Vassileva, J., Noorian, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2015). How do you feel when you see a list of prices? The interplay among price dispersion, perceived risk and initial trust in Chinese C2C market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 25, 36–46.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    * Xu, H., Teo, H. H., Tan, B. (2005). Predicting the adoption of location-based services: The role of trust and perceived privacy risk. In Proceedings of international conference on information systems (pp. 897–910).Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    * Xu, H., Wang, H., & Teo, H. H. (2005). Predicting the usage of P2P sharing software: The role of trust and perceived risk. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    * Yang, Q., Pang, C., Liu, L., Yen, D., & Tarn, T. M. (2015). Exploring consumer perceived risk and trust for online payments: An empirical study in China’s younger generation. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 9–24.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    * Yao, C., & Liao, S. (2011). Measuring the antecedent effects of service cognition and internet shopping anxiety on consumer satisfaction with e-tailing service. Management and Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 6(1), 59–78.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    * Yi, M. Y., Yoon, J. J., Davis, J. M., & Lee, T. (2013). Untangling the antecedents of initial trust in web-based health information: The roles of argument quality, source expertise, and user perceptions of information quality and risk. Decision Support Systems, 55, 284–295.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Yousafzai, S. Y., Pallister, J. G., & Foxall, G. R. (2003). A proposed model of e-trust for electronic banking. Technovation, 23, 847–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 2. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    * Yousafzai, S. Y., Pallister, J. G., & Foxall, G. R. (2009). Multi-dimensional role of trust in internet banking adoption. The Service Industries Journal, 29(5), 591–605.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    * Zhang, M., & Yang, M.(2009). Exploring credit card adoption and usage model of college student. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on information science and engineering (pp. 2923–2927)Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Zhang, L., Zhu, J., & Liu, Q. (2012). A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1902–1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    * Zhou, T. (2011). The impact of privacy concern on user adoption of location-based services. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111(2), 212–226.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    * Zhou, T. (2013). An empirical examination of user adoption of location-based services. Electronic Commerce Research, 13, 25–39.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    * Zhu, D. S., Lee, Z. C., & Neal, G. S. O. (2011). Mr. Risk! Please trust me: Trust antecedents that increase online consumer purchase intention. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 16(3), 1–23.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    * Zimmer, J. C., Arsal, R. E., Al-Marzouq, M., & Grover, V. (2010). Investigating online information disclosure: Effects of information relevance, trust and risk. Information & Management, 47, 115–123.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations