Electronic Commerce Research

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 335–354 | Cite as

Mobile commerce and device specific perceived risk

Article

Abstract

This study examines the role of perceived risk and access device type on consumers’ on-line purchase decisions. We use a two-step hurdle approach to estimate consumer behavior. In the first step, the decision of whether to engage in eCommerce is estimated and in the second step, how many orders to place is estimated. We use a large multi-year survey sample of households from Canada’s national statistical agency—Statistics Canada. The sample size is such that we are able to conduct sub-sample analysis of PC-only users, mobile-only users, and other-users. We show that online security and price significantly influence mobile eCommerce. We also show that there is a statistically significant difference in the intensity of eCommerce engagement across device type and consumer risk type (high/low). One of our main findings is that perceived risk affects purchase decisions for mobile users more than PC users, however additional comparisons are carried out with our analysis.

Keywords

e-Commerce m-Commerce Device type Perceived risk Transactions cost 

References

  1. 1.
    AmeriCommerce. (2014). Data driven ecommerce—Infographic. In AmeriCommerce blogger, May 28, 2014. Retrieved March 26, 2015, from http://www.americommerce.com/blog/Data-Driven-Ecommerce-Infographic.
  2. 2.
    EMarketer. (2014). Retail sales worldwide will top $22 trillion this year. Retrieved December 23, 2014, from www.emarketer.com.
  3. 3.
    Canada S. (2010). Canadian internet use survey.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baumhof, A. (2015). 6 Cybercrime predictions for the year ahead. Kansas City Business Journal, Jan 8, 2015.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ekekwe, N. (2015). The challenges facing e-commerce start-ups in Africa. Harvard Business Review, March 12, 2015.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bosomworth, D. (2015). Mobile Marketing Statistics. January 15, 2015. http://www.smartinsights.com.
  7. 7.
    DeNinno, N. (2014). Men shop online just as much as women but shop on mobile devices, tablets more—Study. International Business Times. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dai, B., Forsythe, S., & Kwon, W.-S. (2014). Impact of online shopping experience on risk perceptions and online purchase intentions: Does product category matter? Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15, 13–24.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lim, W. M. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of e-shopping: An integrated model. Internet Research,. doi:10.1108/IntR-11-2013-0247.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miyazaki, A. D., & Fernandez, A. (2001). Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 27–44. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00101.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cases, A.-S. (2002). Perceived risk and risk-reduction strategies in Internet shopping. The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research, 12, 375–394. doi:10.1080/09593960210151162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glover, S., & Benbasat, I. (2010). A comprehensive model of perceived risk of e-commerce transactions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 47–78. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415150202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 51–90.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, R., & He, F. (2003). Examination of brand knowledge, perceived risk and consumers’ intention to adopt an online retailer. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 14, 677–693. doi:10.1080/1478336032000053825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Forsythe, S. M., & Shi, B. (2003). Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping. Journal of Business Research, 56, 867–875. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00273-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herrero Crespo, A., & Rodriguez del Bosque, I. (2010). The influence of the commercial features of the Internet on the adoption of e-commerce by consumers. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9, 562–575. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 101–134.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Narayanan, M., Koo, B., & Cozzarin, B. P. (2012). Fear of fraud and Internet purchasing. Applied Economic Letters, 19, 1615–1619. doi:10.1080/13504851.2011.648313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yan, R., Cozzarin, B., & Dimitrov, S. (2015). Mobile device access: Effect on online purchases. In Wireless telecommunication symposium (pp. 1–6). New York, NY.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ono, A., Nakamura, A., Okuno, A., & Sumikawa, M. (2012). Consumer motivations in browsing online stores with mobile devices. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 153–178. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415160406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lu, H.-P., & Su, P. Y.-J. (2009). Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites. Internet Research, 19, 442–458. doi:10.1108/10662240910981399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? Information and Management, 42, 719–729. doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chin, E., Felt, A. P., Sekar, V., & Wagner, D. (2012). Measuring user confidence in smartphone security and privacy. In Proceedings of the eighth symposium. Usable privacy and securitySOUPS12 (pp. 1–16). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Garbarino, E., & Strahilevitz, M. (2004). Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation. Journal of Business Research, 57, 768–775. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00363-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mullahy, J. (1986). Specification and testing of some modified count data models. Journal of Econometrics, 33, 341–365. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(86)90002-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Part A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 231, 289–337. doi:10.1098/rsta.1933.0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Katchova, A. L., & Miranda, M. J. (2004). Two-step econometric estimation of farm characteristics affecting marketing contract decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 88–102. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00564.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goh, K. H., & Bockstedt, J. C. (2013). The framing effects of multipart pricing on consumer purchasing behavior of customized information good bundles. Information Systems Research, 24, 334–351. doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Somaya, D., Williamson, I. O., & Lorinkova, N. (2008). Gone but not lost: The different performance impacts of employee mobility between cooperators versus competitors. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 936–953. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.34789660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Williamson, O. E. (1983). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management SciencesUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations