Electronic Commerce Research

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 423–455 | Cite as

Price versus privacy: an experiment into the competitive advantage of collecting less personal information

  • Sören Preibusch
  • Dorothea Kübler
  • Alastair R. Beresford
Article

Abstract

In previous privacy studies, consumers have reported their unease with online retailers that collect a lot of personal data. Consumers claim they will switch to alternative providers or cancel transactions if data collection is deemed excessive. Therefore, privacy appears to be a competitive factor in electronic commerce.

This paper describes a study which quantifies the degree to which privacy is a competitive advantage for online retailers. In an experiment, we offered 225 participants the option to purchase one DVD from one of two online stores. Throughout the study, one online shop asked for more invasive personal data—as confirmed by an exit-questionnaire. In the test treatment, the privacy-invasive store sold DVDs for one Euro less than the other, and in the control treatment, both stores sold DVDs for the same price. Across both treatments, 74 participants made a purchase and had the DVD they bought delivered.

In our study we found that, when the price of DVDs was the same between both stores, the shop asking for less personal data did not amass the entire market. When consumers were offered a trade-off between price and privacy, the vast majority of customers chose to buy from the cheaper, more privacy-invasive, firm; this firm got both a larger market share and higher revenue. The cheaper shop generated strong dissatisfaction with their privacy practises; in contrast, consumers of the more expensive store displayed only weak dissatisfaction with price. We established the validity of our analysis by checking users made informed choices, and did not select one firm over the other due to hasty decision-making or ordering effects. We found no support for either a materialistic lifestyle nor the quest for immediate gratification as to why customers chose the cheaper but privacy-unfriendly store.

Keywords

Economics of privacy Experiment Online shopping Privacy concern Willingness to pay for privacy 

References

  1. 1.
    Backhaus, K. (2003). Industriegütermarketing. München: Vahlen. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beresford, A. R., Kübler, D., & Preibusch, S. (2012). Unwillingness to pay for privacy: a field experiment. Economics Letters, 117(1), 25–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation und neue Medien e.V. (BITKOM) (2010). 12 Millionen Deutsche machen Falschangaben im Web. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    BVerfG (Bundesverfassungsgericht) (1983). BVerfGE 65, 1—Volkszählung. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castañeda, J., & Montoro, F. (2007). The effect of Internet general privacy concern on customer behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 7, 117–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DIW Berlin (2005). SOEP 2005 Methodenbericht zum Befragungsjahr 2005 (Welle 22) des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (Technical report). TNS Infratest Sozialforschung. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerlitz, J.-Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP (Research notes). DIW Berlin. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In GWDG Bericht: Vol. 63. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003 (pp. 79–93). Göttingen: Ges. für Wiss. Datenverarbeitung. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    GSOEP (2008). Leben in Deutschland—Befragung 2008 zur sozialen Lage der Haushalte (Personenfragebogen für alle) (Technical report). TNS Infratest Sozialforschung. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    GSOEP (2008). Living in Germany—Survey 2008 on the social situation of households (Individual question form) (Technical report). TNS Infratest Sozialforschung. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Preibusch, S. (2006). Designing incentive-compatible privacy negotiations. In Security and privacy in future business services (ETRICS 2006). Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Preibusch, S., & Bonneau, J. (2011). The privacy landscape: product differentiation on data collection. In Workshop on the economics of information security (WEIS), June 2011. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramanathan, R. (2010). E-commerce success criteria: determining which criteria count most. Electronic Commerce Research, 10, 191–208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ravichandran, R., Benisch, M., Kelley, P. G., & Sadeh, N. M. (2009). Capturing social networking privacy preferences. In PETS ’09: proceedings of the 9th international symposium on privacy enhancing technologies (pp. 1–18). Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siegel, N. A., Gensicke, A., Stimmel, S., & Stutz, F. (2009). SOEP 2008 Methodenbericht zum Befragungsjahr 2008 (Welle 25) des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (Technical report). TNS Infratest Sozialforschung. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spiekermann, S., Grossklags, J., & Berendt, B. (2001). E-privacy in 2nd generation e-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on electronic commerce, EC ’01 (pp. 38–47). New York: ACM. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2009). Statistisches Jahrbuch 2009 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland / Statistical Yearbook 2009 for the Federal Republic of Germany. Statistisches Bundesamt (Federal Statistical Office), September 2009. Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tatzel, M. (2002). “Money worlds” and well-being: an integration of money dispositions, materialism and price-related behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 103–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor, D., Davis, D., & Jillapalli, R. (2009). Privacy concern and online personalization: the moderating effects of information control and compensation. Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 203–223. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    The Gallup Organization (2008). Data protection in the European Union—citizens’ perceptions (Analytical Report). Flash Eurobarometer Series. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ward, S., Bridges, K., & Chitty, B. (2005). Do incentives matter? An examination of on-line privacy concerns and willingness to provide personal and financial information. The Journal of Marketing & Communications, 11, 21–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sören Preibusch
    • 1
  • Dorothea Kübler
    • 2
  • Alastair R. Beresford
    • 3
  1. 1.Microsoft ResearchCambridgeEngland, UK
  2. 2.Social Science Research Center (WZB) BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Computer LaboratoryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations