Advertisement

Electronic Commerce Research

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 455–484 | Cite as

Innovations, intellectual protection rights and information technology: an empirical investigation in the MENA region

  • Iftekhar HasanEmail author
  • Nada Kobeissi
Article

Abstract

This paper examines innovation, patents, research and development, intellectual protection, information technology, and other related activities in the Middle East and North Africa regions. The paper primarily focuses on the importance of intellectual property rights, reforms, and information technology in affecting innovation, and finds strong positive associations with regards to quantity as well as the quality of innovations. Additionally, the paper finds support for the role of economic freedom, foreign direct investment, and bank loans in contributing to innovative activities.

Keywords

Innovation Patents Research and development Intellectual protection Information technology Middle East and North Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Liang Song for his research help and suggestions. The authors would also like to thank Christopher Tucci and the participants of the Economic Research Forum Conference for their insightful comments. This work has benefited from a financial grant from the Economic Research Forum. The contents and recommendations do not necessarily reflect the views of the Economic Research Forum. The usual caveats apply.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 197–220. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Angelakopoulos, G., & Mihiotis, A. (2011). E-banking: challenges and opportunities in the Greek banking sector. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(3), 297–319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arab Knowledge Report (2009). Towards productive intercommunication for knowledge. Produced jointly by the Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Foundation, and the United Nations Development Programme. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bayoumi, T., Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1999). R&D spillovers and global growth. Journal of International Economics, 47(2), 399–428. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bilbao-Osorio, B., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2004). From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 35(4), 434–455. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Branstetter, L. G., Fisman, R., & Foley, C. F. (2006). Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from US Firm-level panel data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 321–349. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brewer, D. J., Augustine, C. H., Zellman, G. L., Ryan, G., Goldman, C. A., Stasz, C., & Constant, L. (2007). Education for a new era: design and implementation of K-12 education reform in Qatar, MG-548-QATAR. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruche, G. (2009). The emergence of China and India as new competitors in MNCs’. Innovation Networks. Competition & Change, 13(3), 267–288. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: a survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, Y., & Puttitanun, T. (2005). Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(2), 474–493. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39, 859–887. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Delios, A., & Henisz, W. (2003). Political hazards, experience, and sequential entry strategies: the international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980–1988. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1153–1164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dinopoulos, E., & Segerstrom, P. (2010). Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 92, 13–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duguet, E., & MacGarvie, M. (2005). How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5), 375–393. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dutta, A., & Sharma, S. (2008). Intellectual property rights in developing countries: evidence from India. Washington: The Worldbank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/10/10277990/intellectualproperty-rights-innovation-developing-countries-evidence-india. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fagerberg, J. (1994). Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(3), 1147–1175. Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fontana, R., & Guerzoni, M. (2008). Incentives and uncertainty: an empirical analysis of the impact of demand on innovation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(6), 927–946. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Francis, B., Hasan, I., Sharma, Z., & Huang, Y. (2012). Do banks value innovation? Evidence from financial contracts. Financial Management, 41(1), 159–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation. London: Frances Pinter. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Galbraith, J. (1982). Designing the innovating organization. Organizational Dynamics, 11(3), 5–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Geroski P. (1995). Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation, and appropriability. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, Cambridge: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goel, R. K., & Ram, R. (1994). Research and development expenditures and economic growth: a cross-country study. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 42(2), 403–411. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ginarte, J. C., & Park, W. G. (1997). Determinants of patent rights: a cross-national study. Research Policy, 26, 283–301. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grace-Farfaglia, P., Dekkers, A., Sundararajan, B., Peters, L., & Park, S. (2006). Multinational web uses and gratifications: measuring the social impact of online community participation across national boundaries. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 75–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Graham, M. (2006). How Islam created the modern world. Amana Publication. Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Greene, W. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th edn.). New York: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Griliches, Z. (1980). R&D and the productivity slowdown. American Economic Review, 70(2), 343–348. Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707. Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hagedoorn, J., Cloodt, D., & Van Kranenburg, H. (2004). Intellectual property rights and the governance of international R&D partnerships. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 1–12. Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER working paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Harhoff, D., Hoisl, K., & Webb, C. (2006). European patent citations—how to count and how to interpret them? Mimeo. Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hasan, I., Wachtel, P., & Zhou, M. (2009). Institutional development, deepening and economic growth. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 157–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hasan, I., & Tucci, C. (2011). The innovation–economic growth nexus: global evidence. Research Policy, 39(10), 1264–1276. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lin H.-l., & Lin E.S. (2010). FDI, trade, and product innovation: theory and evidence. Southern Economic Journal, 77(2), 434–464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidence by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1/2), 105–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Javorcik, B. (2004). The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: evidence from transition economies. European Economic Review, 48(1), 39–62. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Khoury, T. A., & Peng, M. W. (2011). Does institutional reform of intellectual property rights lead to more inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of World Business, 46(3), 337–345. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Khoury, T. A., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2007). Intellectual property rights reform, institutions, and patenting. Working paper. Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Krammer, S. M. S. (2009). Drivers of national innovation in transition: evidence from a panel of Eastern European countries. Research Policy, 38(5), 845–860. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kumar, N. (1996). Intellectual property protection, market orientation and location of overseas R&D activities by multinational enterprises. World Development, 24(4), 673–688. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lee, J.-Y., & Mansfield, E. (1996). Intellectual property protection and US foreign direct investment. Review of Economics & Statistics, 78(2), 181–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lerner, J. (2000). 150 years of patent protection. NBER working paper series working paper 7478. Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lyons, J. (2010). House of wisdom-how the Arabs transformed western civilization. Bloomsbury Press. 272 p. Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    MacInnes, I. (2006). Property rights, legal issues, and business models in virtual world communities. Electronic Commerce Research, 6, 39–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Maskus, K. (1998). The international regulation of intellectual property. Review Of World Economics, 134(2), 186–208. Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1389–1403. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nelson, R. (1993). National innovations systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nurmilaakso, J.-M. (2009). ICT solutions and labor productivity: evidence from firm-level data. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(3), 173–181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pudelko, M., & Mendenhall, M. E. (2009). The contingent nature of best practices in national competitiveness: the case of American and Japanese innovation processes. European Management Journal, 27(6), 456–466. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Qui, L., & Yu, H. (2010). Does the protection of foreign intellectual property rights stimulate innovation in the US? Review of International Economics, 18(5), 882–895. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Regner, T., Barria, J., Pitt, J., & Neville, B. (2010). Governance of digital content in the era of mass participation. Electronic Commerce Research, 10(1), 99–110. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers. Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shane, S. A. (1992). Why do some societies invent more than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 29–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Spencer, J. W. (2003). Firms’ knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3), 217–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Spulber, D. (2010). The quality of innovation and the extent of the market. Journal of International Economics, 80(2), 260–270. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tushman, M. I., O’Reilly, C. A. III (1997). Winning through innovation. Boston, Harvard: Business School Press. Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Veliyath, R., & Sambharya, R. (2011). R&D investments of multinational corporations. An examination of shifts in patterns of flows across countries and potential influences. Management International Review, 51(3), 407–428. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Von Braun, C. (1997). The innovation at work. Upper Saddle: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wildson, J. (2007). Islamic innovation is finally on a rising crescent. Financial Times, 19 October 2007. Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wong, P., Ping Ho, Y., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335–350. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wu, H. (2010). Distance to frontier, intellectual property rights, and economic growth. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 19(2), 165–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yang, G., & Maskus, K. (2001). Intellectual property rights and licensing: an econometric investigation. Review of World Economics, 137(1), 58–79. Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Yi, Q. (2007). Do national patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment? A cross-country analysis of pharmaceutical patent protection 1978–2002. Review of Economics & Statistics, 89(3), 436–453. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zhuang, Y., & Lederer, A. (2004). The impact of top management commitment, business process redesign, and IT planning on the business-to-consumer E-commerce site. Electronic Commerce Research, 4(4), 315–333. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessFordham UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Bank of FinlandHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.College of ManagementLong Island UniversityBrookvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations