Gender-specific on-line shopping preferences
- First Online:
- 768 Downloads
This study approaches the question of whether on-line shopping preferences differ from a gender perspective. Data is collected by the means of an on-line survey (n=170) in which male and female on-line shoppers rank the importance of various features that have an impact on their shopping experience. The results show no gender differences at the construct level. However, when comparing the ranking of individual features some statistically significant differences exist. Males, for example, rank accurate description of products and fair pricing significantly more important than females. Females on the other hand consider return labels significantly more important than their male counterparts. The implications for research are twofold. First, the study provides additional insights into on-line shopping preferences from a gender perspective. Second, the study demonstrates that significant differences might not show on the construct level but only when features are individually compared with each other. The implication for practice is to help businesses enhance their on-line shopping platforms to better consider the particular needs of male and female on-line shoppers.
KeywordsB2C E-commerce Gender On-line shopping User perspective User satisfaction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1996). Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(2), 59–88. Google Scholar
- 7.Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. Google Scholar
- 8.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2004). Measuring e-commerce success: applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 31–47. Google Scholar
- 10.Schaupp, L. C., Bélanger, F., & Fan, W. (2009). Examining the success of websites beyond e-commerce: an extension of the IS success model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(4), 42–52. Google Scholar
- 11.Simon, S. J. (2001). The impact of culture and gender on web sites: an empirical study. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 32(1), 18–37. Google Scholar
- 14.Reichheld, F. F., & Schefter, P. (2000). E-loyalty: your secret weapon on the Web. Harvard Business Review, 78(4). Google Scholar
- 15.Reichheld, F. F., & Sasser, W. E. J. (1990). Zero defections: quality comes to services. Harvard Business Review, 68(5), 105–111. Google Scholar
- 16.Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E. J., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 164–174. Google Scholar
- 17.Chow, S., & Holden, R. (1997). Toward an understanding of loyalty: the moderating role of trust. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 275–298. Google Scholar
- 19.Schubert, P. (2002). Extended Web assessment method (EWAM): evaluation of electronic commerce applications from the customer’s viewpoint. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(2), 51–80. Google Scholar
- 23.Schaupp, L. C., Fan, W., & Bélanger, F. (2006). Determining success for different website goals. In 39th Haiwaii international conference on systems sciences. Google Scholar
- 24.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. Google Scholar
- 27.Au, N., Ngai, E. W. T., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2008). Extending the understanding of end user information systems satisfaction formation: an equitable needs fulfillment model approach. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 43–66. Google Scholar
- 30.Van Slyke, C., Bélanger, F., Johnson, R. D., & Hightower, R. (2010). Gender-based differences in consumer e-commerce adoption. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26, 17–34. Google Scholar
- 32.Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
- 34.Schubert, P. & Selz, D. (1999). Web assessment: Measuring the effectiveness of electronic e-commerce sites going beyond traditional marketing paradigms. In 32nd Haiwaii international conference on systems sciences, Hawaii. Google Scholar
- 35.Dholakia, R. R., & Chiang, K.-P. (2003). Shoppers in cyberspace: are they from Venus or Mars, and does it matter? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1/2), 171–176. Google Scholar
- 36.Smith, S. M., & Whitlark, D. B. (2001). Men and women online: what makes them click? Marketing Research, 13(2), 20–25. Google Scholar
- 41.U.S. Census Bureau (2009). E-Stats. http://www.census.gov/econ/estats/2007/2007reportfinal.pdf. Accessed December 24 2009.
- 42.U.S. Census Bureau (2009). 2006–2008 American community survey: age and sex. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&-qr_name=ACS_2008_3YR_G00_S0101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_3YR_G00_. Accessed December 24 2009.