Specification and execution of composite trading activities
- 102 Downloads
With the growing number of trading opportunities available online, software tools designed to act on behalf of human traders are increasingly being used to automate trading activities. The next logical step in this evolution is the automation of composite trading activities designed to fulfill complex user goals and requirements. In this paper, we describe a model for specifying composite trading activities involving concurrent and interrelated negotiations with multiple parties and heterogeneous protocols. The model supports the specification of several types of constraints, such as the number of required successful negotiations, the limit price for the items to be traded, and the temporal constraints imposed by all trading parties. In order to guide the execution of the trading activities, we describe a novel planning and execution model for composite trading activities which is designed to maximize the expected utility of the user.
KeywordsTrading activities Negotiation protocols Concurrent negotiations Negotiation plans Expected utility
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Auction Sentry. (2005). http://www.auction-sentry.com. Accessed 8 May 2005.
- 2.Auction Sniper. (2005). http://www.auctionsniper.com. Accessed 8 May 2005.
- 3.eSnipe. (2005). http://www.esnipe.com. Accessed 8 May 2005.
- 4.Proxy bidding. (2005). http://pages.ebay.com/help/buy/proxy-bidding.html. Accessed 8 May 2005.
- 6.Byde, A., Preist, C., & Jennings, N. R. (2002). Decision procedures for multiple auctions. In Proceedings of the 1st international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (pp. 613–620), Bologna, Italy, July 2002. Google Scholar
- 7.Dumas, M., Aldred, L., Governatori, G., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., & Russell, N. (2002). A probabilistic approach to automated bidding in alternative auctions. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on the World Wide Web (WWW) (pp. 99–108), Honolulu, HI, USA, May 2002. New York: ACM. Google Scholar
- 8.Dunn, P. C. (1989). Package trading. In W. H. Wagner (Ed.), The complete guide to securities transactions, enhancing investment performance and controlling costs (pp. 171–184), New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
- 9.Gimenez-Funes, E., Godo, L., Rodrguez-Aguilar, J. A., & Garcia-Calves, P. (1998). Designing bidding strategies for trading agents in electronic auctions. In Y. Demazeau (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on multi-agent systems (ICMAS’98) Paris, France. New York: IEEE. Google Scholar
- 11.Hull, J. (1995). Introduction to futures and options markets (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall International. Google Scholar
- 12.Iverson, K. E. (1962). A programming language. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
- 15.Lomuscio, A. R., Woodridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (2001). A classification scheme for negotiation in electronic commerce. In F. Dignum, & C. Sierra (Eds.), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence: vol. 1991. Agent-mediated electronic commerce: the European AgentLink perspective (pp. 19–33). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
- 18.Milgrom, P. (1989). Auctions and bidding: A primer. Journal of Economics Perspectives, 3(3), 3–22. Google Scholar
- 19.Nguyen, T. D., & Jennings, N. R. (2004). Coordinating multiple concurrent negotiations. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS) (pp. 1064–1071), New York, USA, July 2004. Google Scholar
- 20.Ockenfels, A., & Roth, A. E. (2002). The timing of bids in Internet auctions: market design, bidder behavior, and artificial agents. AI Magazine 23(3), 79–88. Google Scholar
- 22.Rahwan, I., Kowalczyk, R., & Pham, H. H. (2002). Intelligent agents for automated one-to-many e-commerce negotiation. In Proceedings of the 25th Australasian computer science conference (ACSC2002) (pp. 197–204), Melbourne, Australia, January 2002. Google Scholar
- 23.Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
- 24.Rosenschein, J. S., & Zlotkin, G. (1994). Rules of encounter: designing conventions for automated negotiation among computers. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- 26.Sandholm, T. W. (1999). An algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. In T. Dean (Ed.), Proceedings of the 16th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-99) (pp. 542–547). Stockholm: Kaufmann. Google Scholar
- 27.Sandholm, T. W. (1999). Distributed rational decision making. In Weiss, G. (Ed.), Multi-agent systems: a modern introduction to distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 201–258). Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- 29.Si, Y.-W., Edmond, D., Dumas, M., & ter Hofstede, A. H. M. (2005). Specification and execution of composite trading activities (Technical Report FIT-TR-2003-08). Centre for Information Technology Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, December 2003. Available from http://www.bpm.fit.qut.edu.au/about/docs/CompositeTradingActivities.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2005.
- 30.Si, Y.-W., Edmond, D., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., & Dumas, M. (2003). A model for the configurable composition and synchronisation of complex trading activities. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on applied computing (pp. 595–602), Melbourne, FL, USA, March 2003. New York: ACM. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Si, Y.-W., Edmond, D., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., & Dumas, M. (2003). Property propagation rules for prioritising and synchronising trading activities. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE conference on e-commerce (CEC’03) (pp. 246–255), Newport Beach, CA, USA, June 2003. New York: IEEE. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Si, Y.-W., Edmond, D., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., Dumas, M., & Chong, C. U. (2005). Specification of composite trading activities in supply chain management. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on e-technology, e-commerce and e-service 2005 (EEE-05) (pp. 315–322), Hong Kong, China, March 2005. New York: IEEE. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Tate, C. (1990). Understanding options trading in Australia. Information Australia. Google Scholar
- 35.Wellman, M. P., Greenwald, A., Stone, P., & Wurman, P. R. (2002). The 2001 trading agent competition. In Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on innovative applications of artificial intelligence (IAAI-02) (pp. 935–941), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Google Scholar
- 36.Winoto, P., McCalla, G., & Vassileva, J. (2002). An extended alternating-offers bargaining protocol for automated negotiation in multi-agent systems. In R. Meersman, & Z. Tari (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science : Vol. 2519. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on cooperative information systems (CoopIS’2002) (pp. 179–194). Irvine: Springer. Google Scholar