Electronic Commerce Research

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 39–56 | Cite as

Property rights, legal issues, and business models in virtual world communities

  • Ian MacInnes


This paper uses a business model framework to help identify the issues that developers of virtual worlds have to address as their enterprises mature. While most virtual worlds have adopted subscription models there is an increasing trend toward selling digital items directly to users. This arises from the emergent markets linking real world currency to items existing on company servers. This practice has resulted in controversial and unresolved legal issues. Communities that arise from virtual worlds can be classified according to level and type of control. Lack of control can lead to a Hobbesian world of predation and vigilantism. Strong developer control can be exerted to protect users but communities adopting shared governance with users are likely to become more common.


Virtual communities Property rights Virtual worlds Online games Item trade EULA 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Au, W.J. (2004). The first warning sign of encroaching capitalism and corporate influence. Available at
  3. [3]
    Blanchard, A., & Horan, T. (1998). Virtual communities and social capital. Science Computer Review, 16, 293–307.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bradley, C., & Froomkin, M. (2003). Virtual worlds, real rules. Telecommunications Policy Research Conference.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bruynseels, K., & Vos, J. (2000). Organisation and visualisation of tacit knowledge in virtual communities. In virtual worlds (Vol. 1834, pp. 24–31).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Buchanan, J.M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Castronova, E. (2003). EverQuest to Launch Casino. Availbale at
  8. [8]
    Castronova, E. (2002). On virtual communities. CESIFO Working Paper, 752.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Castronova, E. (2004). Synthetic world economic Data. Availbale at
  10. [10]
    Castronova, E. (2001). Virtual worlds: A first hand account of market and society on the Cyberian frontier. CESifo Working Paper, 618.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Daniel, B., McCalla, G., & Schwier, R. (2002). A process model for building social capital in virtual learning communities. In International Conference on Computers in Education, Vols. I and II, Proceedings (pp. 574–575).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    De, R. (2003). Social resistance and the self in virtual communities. The Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Dibbell, J. (2003). “Owned!: Intellectual property in the age of dupers, gold farmers, eBayers, and other enemies of the virtual state. The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Dibbell, J. (2003). The unreal estate boom. in wired, vol. 11.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Duh, R., Jamal, K., & Sunder, S. (2001). Control and assurance in e-commerce: Privacy, Integrity and Security at eBay. Sloan Management Review, 43, 17.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Eliasson, G., & Wihlborg, C. (2003). On the macroeconomic effects of establishing tradability in weak property rights. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 607–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Ginsburg, M. (2001). Growing out of its skin: Principles of the evolution and extension of the Internet Chess Club, 1995 to Present. Proceedings of the Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2001).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Hagel, J., & Armstrong, A.G. (1996). The real value of on-line communities. Harvard Business Review May–June, 134–141.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Jansen, W., Steenbakkers, G.C.A., & Jagers, H.P.M. (2000). Knowledge management and virtual communities. In Challenges of information technology management in the 21st century (pp. 984–988).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Kahin, B., & Varian, H.R. (2000). Internet publishing and beyond—The economics of digital information and intellectual property—Introduction. In Internet Publishing and Beyond (pp. 1–5). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Kardaras, D., & Karakostas, B. (2000). Virtual communities in banking: An empirical study. In Bis 2000 (pp. 245–254).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Klang, M., & Olsson, S. (1999). Building communities online. In Proceedings of Fourth International Workshop on Cscw in Design (pp. 43–52).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Lastowka, F.G., & Hunter, D. (2004). The laws of the virtual worlds. California Law Review, 92.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Lawsuit fires up in case of vanishing virtual weapons. Available at
  25. [25]
    Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Lessig, L. (2002). The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Litman, J. (2001). Digital copyright protecting intellectual property on the internet. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Ludlow, P. (2004). Griefers and group formation in Alphaville. Times of London, January 31, 2004.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Lueg, C. (2001). Information dissemination in virtual communities as challenge to real world companies. In Towards the E-Society: E-Commerce, E-Business and E-Government (Vol. 74, pp. 261–270).Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    MacInnes, I. (2002). Business models for interactive entertainment communities. International Telecommunications Society Biennial Conference.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    MacInnes, I. (2005). Dynamic business model framework for emerging technologies. International Journal of Services Technology and Management.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    MacInnes, I., Kongsmak, K., & Heckman, R. (2002). Barriers to digital distribution in the book and software industries. International Conference on Electronic Commerce.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Mueller, M. (2002). Ruling the root: Internet governance and the Taming of cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Ondrejka, C. (2003). Escaping the gilded cage: User created content and building the metaverse. The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Reeves, H.S. (1996). Property in cyberspace. University of Chicago Law Review, 63.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Schlachter, E. (1997). The intellectual property renaissance in cyberspace: why copyright law could be unimportant on the Internet. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 12.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Schroder, D., & Yin, P. (2000). Communications of the ACM, 43.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Schubert, P., & Koch, M. (2002). The power of personalization: Customer collaboration and virtual communities. Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS).Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Sharp, C. (2003). Business integration for games: An introduction to online games and E-business infrastructure. Available at
  41. [41]
    Taylor, T.L. (2002). Whose game is this anyway? Negotiating corporate ownership in a virtual world. Computer Games and Digital Cultures.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Vasilopoulou, K., Pouloudi, N., Patronidou, S., & Poulymenakou, A. (2002). Business models: A proposed framework. e-Business and e-Work Annual Conference.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Wathne, K., & Heide, J. (2001). Choice of supplier in embedded markets: Relationship and marketing program effect. Journal of Marketing, 65, 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Williams, R., & Cothrel, J. (2000). Four smart ways to run online communities. Sloan Management Review, 41, 81–91.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information StudiesSyracuse University, 4-206 Center for Science and TechnologySyracuse

Personalised recommendations