Journal of Elasticity

, Volume 129, Issue 1–2, pp 49–68 | Cite as

On Fiber Dispersion Models: Exclusion of Compressed Fibers and Spurious Model Comparisons

Article

Abstract

Fiber dispersion in collagenous soft tissues has an important influence on the mechanical response, and the modeling of the collagen fiber architecture and its mechanics has developed significantly over the last few years. The purpose of this paper is twofold, first to develop a method for excluding compressed fibers within a dispersion for the generalized structure tensor (GST) model, which several times in the literature has been claimed not to be possible, and second to draw attention to several erroneous and misleading statements in the literature concerning the relative values of the GST and the angular integration (AI) models. For the GST model we develop a rather simple method involving a deformation dependent dispersion parameter that allows the mechanical influence of compressed fibers within a dispersion to be excluded. The theory is illustrated by application to simple extension and simple shear in order to highlight the effect of exclusion. By means of two examples we also show that the GST and the AI models have equivalent predictive power, contrary to some claims in the literature. We conclude that from the theoretical point of view neither of these two models is superior to the other. However, as is well known and as we now emphasize, the GST model has proved to be very successful in modeling the data from experiments on a wide range of tissues, and it is easier to analyze and simpler to implement than the AI approach, and the related computational effort is much lower.

Keywords

Fiber dispersion model Generalized structure tensor Angular integration model Fibrous tissue Exclusion of compressed fibers 

Mathematics Subject Classification

74B20 74E10 74L15 

References

  1. 1.
    Schriefl, A.J., Wolinski, H., Regitnig, P., Kohlwein, S.D., Holzapfel, G.A.: An automated approach for 3D quantification of fibrillar structures in optically cleared soft biological tissues. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20120760 (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pierce, D.M., Trobin, W., Raya, J.G., Trattnig, S., Bischof, H., Glaser, Ch., Holzapfel, G.A.: DT-MRI based computation of collagen fiber deformation in human articular cartilage: a feasibility study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38, 2447–2463 (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lanir, Y.: Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J. Biomech. 16, 1–12 (1983) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gasser, T.C., Ogden, R.W., Holzapfel, G.A.: Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 15–35 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holzapfel, G.A., Niestrawska, J.A., Ogden, R.W., Reinisch, A.J., Schriefl, A.J.: Modelling non-symmetric collagen fibre dispersion in arterial walls. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20150188 (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Federico, S., Herzog, W.: Towards an analytical model of soft biological tissues. J. Biomech. 41, 3309–3313 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cortes, D.H., Lake, S.P., Kadlowec, J.A., Soslowsky, L.J., Elliot, D.M.: Characterizing the mechanical contribution of fiber angular distribution in connective tissue: comparison of two modeling approaches. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 9, 651–658 (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pandolfi, A., Vasta, M.: Fiber distributed hyperelastic modeling of biological tissues. Mech. Mater. 44, 151–162 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lanir, Y., Namani, R.: Reliability of structure tensors in representing soft tissues structure. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 46, 222–228 (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holzapfel, G.A., Ogden, R.W.: On the tension–compression switch in soft fibrous solids. Eur. J. Mech. A, Solids 49, 561–569 (2015) ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, K., Ogden, R.W., Holzapfel, G.A.: Computational method for excluding fibers under compression in modeling soft fibrous solids. Eur. J. Mech. A, Solids 57, 178–193 (2016) ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melnik, A.V., Borja Da Rocha, H., Goriely, A.: On the modeling of fiber dispersion in fiber-reinforced elastic materials. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 75, 92–106 (2015) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gizzi, A., Pandolfi, A., Vasta, M.: Statistical characterization of the anisotropic strain energy in soft materials with distributed fibers. Mech. Mater. 92, 119–138 (2016) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolfram Research, Inc. Mathematica, Version 10.4. Champaign, Illinois (2016) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ogden, R.W.: Nonlinear continuum mechanics and modelling the elasticity of soft biological tissues with a focus on artery walls. In: Holzapfel, G.A., Ogden, R.W. (eds.) Lecture Notes from the Summer School “Biomechanics: Trends in Modeling and Simulation”, Graz, Austria, September, 2014. Springer, Heidelberg (2016) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weisbecker, H., Pierce, D.M., Regitnig, P., Holzapfel, G.A.: Layer-specific damage experiments and modeling of human thoracic and abdominal aortas with non-atherosclerotic intimal thickening. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 12, 93–106 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fereidoonnezhad, B., Naghdabadi, R., Holzapfel, G.A.: Stress softening and permanent deformation in human aortas: continuum and computational modeling with application to arterial clamping. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 61, 600–616 (2016) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of BiomechanicsGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering Science and TechnologyNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  3. 3.School of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations