Cohesive Dynamics and Brittle Fracture
- 560 Downloads
We formulate a nonlocal cohesive model for calculating the deformation inside a cracking body. In this model a set of physical properties including elastic and softening behavior are assigned to each point in the medium. We work within the small deformation setting and use the peridynamic formulation. Here strains are calculated as difference quotients. The constitutive relation is given by a nonlocal cohesive law relating force to strain. At each instant of the evolution we identify a process zone where strains lie above a threshold value. Perturbation analysis shows that jump discontinuities within the process zone can become unstable and grow. We derive an explicit inequality that shows that the size of the process zone is controlled by the ratio given by the length scale of nonlocal interaction divided by the characteristic dimension of the sample. The process zone is shown to concentrate on a set of zero volume in the limit where the length scale of nonlocal interaction vanishes with respect to the size of the domain. In this limit the dynamic evolution is seen to have bounded linear elastic energy and Griffith surface energy. The limit dynamics corresponds to the simultaneous evolution of linear elastic displacement and the fracture set across which the displacement is discontinuous. We conclude illustrating how aspects of the approach developed here can be applied to limits of dynamics associated with other energies that \(\varGamma\)-converge to the Griffith fracture energy.
KeywordsPeridynamics Dynamic brittle fracture Fracture toughness Process zone \(\varGamma\)-Convergence
Mathematics Subject Classification34A34 74H55 74R10
The author would like to thank Stewart Silling, Richard Lehoucq and Florin Bobaru for stimulating and fruitful discussions. This research is supported by NSF grant DMS-1211066, AFOSR grant FA9550-05-0008, and NSF EPSCOR Cooperative Agreement No. EPS-1003897 with additional support from the Louisiana Board of Regents.
- 3.Ambrosio, L., Brades, A.: Energies in SBV and variational models in fracture mechanics. In: Cioranescu, D., Damlamian, A., Donato, P. (eds.) Homogenization and Applications to Materials Science 9, pp. 1–22. Gakkotosho, Tokyo (1997) Google Scholar
- 8.Bažant, Z.P., Planas, J.: Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1998) Google Scholar
- 19.Braides, A.: Discrete approximation of functionals with jumps and creases. In: Homogenization. Naples, 2001. Gakuto Internat. Ser. Math. Sci. Appl., vol. 18, pp. 147–153. Gakkotosho, Tokyo (2003) Google Scholar
- 24.Driver, B.: Analysis Tools with Applications. Springer, Berlin (2003). E-book Google Scholar
- 32.Falk, M., Needleman, A., Rice, J.R.: A critical evaluation of cohesive zone models of dynamic fracture. J. Phys. IV 11, 43–50 (2001) Google Scholar
- 51.Matthies, H., Strang, G., Christiansen, E.: The saddle point of a differential program. In: Energy Methods in Finite Element Analysis. Wiley, New York (1979) Google Scholar