Histopathology of Phakopsora euvitis on Vitis vinifera

  • Barbara Ludwig Navarro
  • João Paulo Rodrigues Marques
  • Beatriz Appezzato-da- Glória
  • Marcel Bellato SpósitoEmail author


Rust (Phakopsora euvitis) is an important fungal disease in grapevines grown in tropical and subtropical regions. Epidemiological works have been conducted on plant disease resistance, however, little is known about defense mechanisms of resistance to the disease. Leaves of Vitis vinifera cv. Moscato Giallo were inoculated with P. euvitis and lesions were formed with pustules surrounded by water-soaked halo 17 days after inoculation. Foliar tissue of injured and sound material was fixed and submitted to histological techniques. Emergence of pustules from stomata was observed. In water-soaked halo, hyphae of fungus were not observed. In this region, foliar blade presented mesophyll modified by cell hypertrophy with reduction of intercellular spaces and accumulation of pectic compounds. Hypertrophied cells showed parietal thickenings in the cellulose and pectin layers. In the areas delimited by water-soaked halo in the pustule region, the fungus grew vigorously in intercellular spaces of chlorophyll parenchyma; however, vascular bundles also restricted the advance of fungus where sheath cells present parietal pectic thickenings. Therefore, although Vitis vinifera cv. Moscato showed rust symptoms on leaves, pathogen colonization was limited by the formation of water-soaked haloes and vascular bundles, which resulted in minor injuries along the foliar limbo.


Anatomy Fungal infection Grapevine rust Hipertrophy Pectin Resistance mechanisms 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP Proc: 2013/24003-9). We thank the Center of Support in Electron Microscopy Applied to Agriculture, ESALQ, USP, at the laboratory of Plant Anatomy of ESALQ (LanVeg) for the use of equipment. We also thank Msc. Marli Kasue Missake Soares for helping in material preparation for the anatomical analysis. BLN thanks Dr. Antonio F. Nogueira Jr. for his comments to the manuscript.


  1. Adaskaveg, J. E. (1992). Defense mechanisms in leaves and fruit of trees to fungal infection. In R. A. Blanchette & A. R. Biggs (Eds.), Defense mechanisms of woody plants against fungi (pp. 207–245). New York: Sping-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrios, G. N. (2005). Plant pathology (5th ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Albersheim, P., Darvil, A., Roberts, K., Sederoff, R., & Staehelin, A. (2011). Plant cell walls. From chemistry to biology (430p). New York: Garland Science.Google Scholar
  4. Amorim, L., Spósito, M. B., & Kuniyuki, H. (2016). Doenças da videira. In L. Amorim, J. A. M. Rezende, A. Bergamin Filho, & L. E. A. Camargo (Eds.), Manual de Fitopatologia: Doenças das plantas cultivadas (pp. 745–585). Ouro Fino- MG: Agronômica Ceres.Google Scholar
  5. Angelotti, F., Scapin, C. R., Tessmann, D. J., Vida, J. B., Vieira, R. A., & Souto, E. R. (2008). Resistência de genótipos de videira à ferrugem. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 43(9), 1129–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angelotti, F., Scapin, C. R., Tessmann, D. J., Vida, J. B., & Canteri, M. G. (2014). The effect of temperature, leaf wetness and light on development of grapevine rust. Australasian Plant Pathology, 43(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Appezzato-da-Glória, B., Bron, I. U., & Machado, S. R. (2004). Lanosidade em cultivares de pêssego (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch): estudos anatômicos e ultra-estruturais. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, 27(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
  8. Bellincampi, D., Cervone, F., & Lionetti, V. (2014). Plant cell wall dynamics and wall-related susceptibility in plant-pathogen interactions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5(228), 1–8.Google Scholar
  9. Candolfi-Vasconcelos, M. C., & Koblet, W. (1990). Yield, fruit quality, bud fertility and starch reserves of the wood as a function of leaf removal in Vitis vinifera - evidence of compensation and stress recovering. Vitis, 29, 199–221.Google Scholar
  10. Chamberlain, C. J. (1932). Methods in plant histology (5th ed.p. 416). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chatasiri, S., & Ono, Y. (2008). Phylogeny and taxonomy of the Asian grapevine leaf rust fungus, Phakopsora euvitis, and its allies (Uredinales). Mycoscience, 49, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chowdhury, J., Henderson, M., Schweizer, P., Burtonm, R. A., Fincher, G. B., & Little, A. (2014). Differential accumulation of callose, arabinoxylan and cellulose in nonpenetrated versus penetrated papillae on leaves of barley infected with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. New Phytologist, 204(3), 650–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAOSTAT, 2017. <>. Acessed in 10/09/2017.
  14. Greenspan, P., Mayer, E. P., & Fowler, S. D. (1985). Nile red Ba selective fluorescent stain for intracellular lipid droplets. Journal of Cell Biology, 100, 965–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hennessy, C. R., Daly, A. M., & Hearnden, M. N. (2007). Assessment of grapevine 214 cultivars for resistance to Phakopsora euvitis. Australasian Plant Pathology, 36(4), 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hinch, J. M., & Clarke, A. E. (1982). Callose formation in Zea mays as a response to infection with Phytophthora cinnamomi. Physiological Plant Pathology, 21, 121–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horridge, G. A., & Tamm, S. L. (1969). Critical point drying for scanning electron microscopy study of cilliar motion. Science, 3869, 871–818.Google Scholar
  18. Hückelhoven, R. (2007). Cell Wall –associated mechamisms of disease resistance and susceptibility. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 45, 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hughes, J., & McCully, M. E. (1975). The use os brithtener in study of plant structure. Stain Technology, 50, 319–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johansen, D. A. (1940). Plant microtechnique. New York: McGraw-Hill Company Inc..Google Scholar
  21. Karabourniotis, G., Borman, J. F., & Liakoura, V. (1999). Different leaf surface characteristics of three grape cultivars affect leaf optical properties as measured with fibre optics: Possible implication in stress tolerance. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 26, 47–53.Google Scholar
  22. Karnovsky, M. J. (1965). A formaldehyde–glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology, 27, 137–138.Google Scholar
  23. Keogh, R. C., Deverall, B. J., & Mc Leod, S. (1980). Comparison of histological and physiological responses to Phakopsora pachyrhizi in resistant and susceptible soybean. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 74(2), 329–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lionetti, V., Cervone, F., & Bellincampi, D. (2012). Methyl esterification of pectin plays a role during plant-pathogen interactions and affects plant resistance to diseases. Plant Physiology, 169(16), 1623–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marques, J. P. R., Hoy, J. W., Appezzato-da-Glória, B., Viveros, A. F. G., Vieria, M. L. C., & Baisakh, N. (2018). Sugarcane cell wall-associated defense responses to infection by Sponsorium scitameneum. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nogueira Júnior, A. F., Ribeiro, R. V., Appezzato-da-Glória, B., Soares, M. K. M., Rasera, J. B., & Amorim, L. (2017). Phakopsora euvitis causes unusual damage to leaves and modifies carbohydrate metabolism in grapevine. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Brien, T. P., Feder, N., & McCully, M. E. (1964). Polychromatic staining of plant cell walls by toluidine blue. Protoplasma, 59, 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peaucell, A., Braybrook, S., & Herman-Höfte, H. (2012). Cell wall mechanics and growth control in plants: the role of pectins revisited.
  29. Platero, M., & Tejerina, G. (1976). Calcium nutrition in Phaseolus vulgaris in relation to its resistance to Erwinia carotovora. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift, 85, 314–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Primiano, I. V., Loehrer, M., Amorim, L., & Schaffrath, U. (2017). Asian grapevine leaf rust caused by Phakopsora euvitis: An important disease in Brazil. Plant Pathology, 66, 691–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tessmann, D. J., Dianese, J. C., Gent, W., Vida, J. B., & May-de-Mio, L. L. (2004). Grape rust caused by Phakopsora euvitis, a new disease for Brazil. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 29(3), 338–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Unger, S., Büche, C., Boso, S., & Kassemeyer, H-H. (2007). The course of colonization of two different genotypes by indicates compatible and incompatible host-pathogen interactions. Phytopathology, 97(7), 780–786.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Ludwig Navarro
    • 1
    • 2
  • João Paulo Rodrigues Marques
    • 3
  • Beatriz Appezzato-da- Glória
    • 4
  • Marcel Bellato Spósito
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Plant Pathology and NematologyUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Crop Science, Division Plant Pathology and Crop ProtectionGeorge-August-University GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  3. 3.Laboratory of Nuclear Instrumentation, Center of Nuclear Energy to AgricultureUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  4. 4.Department of Biological ScienceUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  5. 5.Department of Crop ScienceUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations