Host response of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes is determined by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolate type
- 83 Downloads
Studies were undertaken to characterise the interactions of eight Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolates/pathotypes on leaves of intact plants of 17 Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. For lesion diameter and lesion incidence, there were significant (P ≤ 0.001) effects of pathogen isolates, A. thaliana ecotypes, and a significant interaction between isolates and ecotypes in all three experiments. Resistance to S. sclerotiorum infection across the ecotypes ranged from highly susceptible through to resistant and the bioassay was sensitive enough to allow assessment of small differences in partial relative resistances across the ecotypes. While some A. thaliana ecotypes, such as Sha, Bay-0, Ws-1 and Ws-2, were found to be highly susceptible to all S. sclerotiorum isolates tested, others, such as Er-0, Jea and Cvi-0, showed a consistent level of resistance, and of these latter, Er-0 showed the highest and most consistent expression of resistance. In contrast, Col-0, Nd-0 and Oy-0 responses ranged from relative resistant to highly susceptible, depending upon the isolate being tested. Some isolates, such as MBRS1, elicited a wide range of resistance responses across the ecotypes, making these isolates most useful for screening the full range of A. thaliana ecotypes for their responses to S. sclerotiorum. In contrast, other isolates such as ‘Cabbage’ only generated lesions over a very narrow size range of host resistance response and hence could limit the ability of such isolates to differentiate resistances across diverse A. thaliana populations. Increasing the number of ecotypes tested increased the capacity to differentiate both the levels of relative resistance amongst test ecotypes and the varying levels of aggressiveness between different isolates. This is the first known study to demonstrate how Arabidopsis resistance responses can be expressed or compromised by variation in aggressiveness amongst different S. sclerotiorum isolates and/or pathotypes.
KeywordsSclerotinia sclerotiorum Sclerotinia rot Arabidopsis thaliana Brassicaceae Crucifer Brassica Host resistance
Xintian Ge was the recipient of an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship, The University of Western Australia, a scholarship from Kunming Floral World Bio-Tech Co. Ltd., Kunming, Peoples Republic of China, and ‘top-up’ funding by the Institute of Agriculture at the University of Western Australia. We appreciate the operational funding support for this research provided by the Australia Research Council and the Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia (Project LP100200113, ‘Factors responsible for host resistance to the pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum for developing effective disease management in vegetable Brassicas’); and The University of Western Australia, for additional operational funding this work. We are greatly indebted to Dr. Oliver Berkowitz, Murdoch University, Western Australia for supplying seed of the Arabidopsis ecotypes. Exceptional technical support is acknowledged from Mr. Robert Creasy and Mr. Bill Piasini in the UWA Plant Growth Facilities.
Compliance with ethical standards
Human and animal studies
This research did not involve any animal and/or human participants.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
- Balague´, C., Lin, B., Alcon, C., Flottes, G., Malmstrom, S., Kohler, C., Neuhaus, G., Pelletier, G., Gaymard, F., & Roby, D. (2003). HLM1, an essential signaling component in the hypersensitive response, is a member of the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel ion channel family. Plant Cell, 15, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barbetti, M. J., Banga, S. K., Fu, T. D., Li, Y. C., Singh, D., Liu, S. Y., Ge, X. T., & Banga, S. S. (2014). Comparative genotype reactions to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum within breeding populations of Brassica napus and B. juncea from India and China. Euphytica, 197, 47–59.Google Scholar
- Barbetti, M. J., Li, C. X., Banga, S. S., Banga, S. K., Singh, D., Singh, P. S., Singh, R., Liu, S. Y., & You, M. P. (2015). New host resistances in Brassica napus and B. juncea from Australia, China and India: Key to managing Sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) without fungicides. Crop Protection, 78, 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bert, P. F., Jouan, I., de Labrouhe, T. D., Serre, F., Nicolas, P., & Vear, F. (2002). Comparative genetic analysis of quantitative traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) 1. QTL involved in resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Diaporthe helianthi. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 105, 985–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boccongelli, C., Buzi, A., Chilosi, G., Magro, P., & Bressan, R. A. (2003a). Evaluation of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes for resistance to damping-off caused by Pythium sylvaticum and stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Journal of Plant Pathology, 85, 286.Google Scholar
- Boccongelli, C., Chilosi, G., Magro, P., & Bressan, R. A. (2003b). Isolation of a new Arabidopsis mutant with enhanced disease tolerance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Journal of Plant Pathology, 85, 277.Google Scholar
- Clark, R. M., Schweikert, G., Toomajian, C., Ossowski, S., Zeller, G., Shinn, P., Warthmann, N., Hu, T. T., Fu, G., Hinds, D. A., Chen, H., Frazer, K. A., Huson, D. H., Scholkopf, B., Nordborg, M., Ratsch, G., Ecker, J. R., & Weigel, D. (2007). Common sequence polymorphisms shaping genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science, 317, 338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clarkson, J. P., Warmington, R. J., Walley, P. G., Denton-Giles, M., Barbetti, M. J., Brodal, G., & Nordskog, B. (2017b). Population structure of Sclerotinia subarctica and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in England, Scotland and Norway. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8(490). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00490.
- Delourme, R., Barbetti, M. J., Snowdon, R., Zhao, J., & Manzanares-Dauleux, M. (2011). Genetics and genomics of resistance. In D. Edwards, J. Batley, I. A. P. Parkin, & C. Kole (Eds.), Genetics, genomics and breeding of oilseed brassicas (pp. 276–318). USA: Science Publishers, CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Garg, H., Li, H., Han, S., Sivasithamparam, K., & Barbetti, M. J. (2008). Cotyledon assay as a rapid and reliable method of screening for resistance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Brassica napus genotpes. Australasian Plant Pathology 37, 106–111.Google Scholar
- Ge, X., Li, Y. P., Wan, Z. J., You, M. P., Finnegan, P. M., Banga, S. S., Sandhu, P. S., Garg, H., Salisbury, P. A., & Barbetti, M. J. (2012). Delineation of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum pathotypes using differential resistance responses on Brassica napus and B. juncea genotypes enables identification of resistance to prevailing pathotypes. Field. Crop Research, 127, 248–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glazebrook, J., Rogers, E. E., & Ausubel, F. M. (1996). Isolation of Arabidopsis mutants with enhanced disease susceptibility by direct screening. Genetics, 143, 973–982.Google Scholar
- Li, C. X., Li, H., Sivasithamparam, K., Fu, T. D., Li, Y. C., Liu, S. Y., & Barbetti, M. J. (2006). Expression of field resistance under western Australian conditions to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Chinese and Australian Brassica napus and Brassica juncea germplasm and its relation with stem diameter. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57, 1131–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, C. X., Li, H., Siddique, A. B., Sivasithamparam, K., Salisbury, P., Banga, S. S., Banga, S., Chattopadhyay, C., Kumar, A., Singh, R., Singh, D., Agnihotri, A., Liu, S. Y., Li, Y. C., Tu, J., Fu, T. D., Wang, Y. F., & Barbetti, M. J. (2007). The importance of the type and time of inoculation and assessment in the determination of resistance in Brassica napus and B. juncea to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 58, 1198–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, C. X., Liu, S. Y., Sivasithamparam, K., & Barbetti, M. J. (2009). New sources of resistance to Sclerotinia stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Chinese and Australian Brassica napus and Brassica juncea germplasm screened under Western Australian conditions. Australasian Plant Pathology, 38, 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loudet, O., Chaillou, S., Camilleri, C., Bouchez, D., & Daniel-Vedele, F. (2002). Bay-0 x Shahdara recombinant inbred line population: a powerful tool for the genetic dissection of complex traits in Arabidopsis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104, 11730–1184.Google Scholar
- Mitchell-Olds, T., & Schmitt, J. (2006). Genetic mechanisms and evolutionary significance of natural variation in Arabidopsis. Nature 441, 947–952.Google Scholar
- Perchepied, L., Balagué, C., Riou, C., Claudel-Renard, C., Rivière, N., Grezes-Besset, B., & Roby, D. (2010). Nitric oxide participates in the complex interplay of defense-related signaling pathways controlling disease resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 23, 846–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rana, K., Atri, C., Gupta, M., Akhatar, J., Sandhu, P. S., Kumar, N., Jaswal, R., Barbetti, M. J., & Banga, S. S. (2017). Mapping resistance responses to Sclerotinia infestation in introgression lines of Brassica juncea carrying genomic segments from wild Brassicaceae B. fruticulosa. Scientific Reports, 7, 5904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05992-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singh, D., Singh, R., Salisbury, P., & Barbetti, M. J. (2011). Genetic diversity in Australian, Indian and Chinese oilseed Brassica germplasm against sclerotinia-rot resistance. Proceedings of the International Rapeseed Congress, June 5–9, 2011, Prague, Czech Republic. pp. 665–669.Google Scholar
- Thomma, B., Eggermont, K., Penninckx, I., Mauch-Mani, B., Vogelsang, R., Cammue, B., & Broekaert, W. (1998). Separate jasmonate-dependent and salicylate-dependent defense-response pathways in Arabidopsis are essential for resistance to distinct microbial pathogens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A., 95, 15107–15111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Uloth, M., You, M. P., & Barbetti, M. J. (2016). Host resistance to Sclerotinia stem rot in historic and current Brassica napus and B. juncea varieties: Critical management implications. Crop and Pasture. Science, 66, 841–848.Google Scholar
- Volko, S. M., Boller, T., & Ausubel, F. M. (1998). Isolation of new Arabidopsis mutants with enhanced disease susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae by direct screening. Genetics, 149, 5376–5548.Google Scholar
- You, M. P., Uloth, M. B., Xi, X., Banga, S. S., Banga, S. K., & Barbetti, M. J. (2016). Valuable new resistances ensure improved management of Sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) in horticultural and oilseed Brassica species. Journal of Phytopathology, 164, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhao, J., Udall, J., Quijada, P., Grau, C., Meng, J., & Osborn, T. (2006). Quantitative trait loci for resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and its association with a homeologous non-reciprocal transposition in Brassica napus L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 112, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhou, L. C., Yu, Q., Liu, S. Y., & Zhou, B. W. (1994). Evaluation of Sclerotinia resistance in rapeseed. Chinese Oilseed Crops, 4((suppl.)), 69–72.Google Scholar