Advertisement

Genetic diversity of Fusarium graminearum isolated from weeds

  • D. Sneideris
  • A. Ivanauskas
  • S. Suproniene
  • G. Kadziene
  • S. Sakalauskas
Article
First Online:
Accepted:

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a devastating disease of cereals worldwide. The primary hosts of this pathogen are wheat and barley, but it also can survive and spread in segetal plants. Data on Fusarium graminearum subpopulations in weeds is lacking. We collected isolates of F. graminearum sensu stricto from segetal plants growing in six separate crop fields and used variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) markers to gain insights into the diversity of its subpopulations. Ten primer pairs of VNTR markers were tested on 57 F. graminearum isolates obtained from 415 sampled plants representing 52 species. High genetic diversity was found, even in this relatively small number of isolates.

Keywords

FHB Fusarium graminearum VNTR Genotypic diversity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Lithuanian Research Council through the National Research Program “Sustainability of agro, forest and water ecosystems”. Grant number – SIT-05/2015.

Funding

This study was funded by the Lithuanian Research Council (grant number: SIT-05/20015).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Not applicable, the research does not involve humans or animals.

Informed consent

Not applicable, the research does not involve human participants.

References

  1. Aamot, H. U., Ward, T. J., Brodal, G., Vralstad, T., Larsen, G. B., Klemsdal, S. S., Elameen, A., Uhlig, S., & Hofgaard, I. S. (2015). Genetic and phenotypic diversity within the Fusarium graminearum species complex in Norway. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 142, 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki, T., Ward, T. J., Kistler, H. C., & O’Donnell, K. (2012). Systematics, phylogeny and trichothecene mycotoxin potential of Fusarium head blight cereal pathogens. Mycotoxins, 62, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boutigny, A. L., Ward, T. J., Ballois, N., Iancu, G., & Ioos, R. (2014). Diversity of the Fusarium graminearum species complex on French cereals. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 138, 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jennings, P., Coates, M. E., Turner, J. A., Chandler, E. A., & Nicholson, P. (2004). Determination of deoxynivalenol and nivalenol chemotypes of Fusarium culmorum isolates from England and Wales by PCR assay. Plant Pathology, 53, 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Leslie, J. F., & Summerell, B. A. (2006). The Fusarium laboratory manual. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mathur, S. B., & Kongsdal, O. (2003). Common laboratory seed health testing methods of detecting fungi. Bassersdorf, Switzerland: International Seed Testing Association (ISTA).Google Scholar
  7. Mourelos, C. A., Malbrán, I., Balatti, P. A., Ghiringhelli, P. D., & Lori, G. A. (2014). Gramineous and non-gramineous weed species as alternative hosts of Fusarium graminearum, causal agent of Fusarium head blight of wheat, in Argentina. Crop Protection, 65, 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nicholson, P., Simpson, D. R., Weston, G., Rezanoor, H. N., Lees, A. K., Parry, D. W., & Joyce, D. (1998). Detection and quantification of Fusarium culmorum and Fusarium graminearum in cereals using PCR assays. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 53, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sakalauskas, S., Stumbriene, K., Suproniene, S., & Svegzda, P. (2014). Changes in Fusarium link species composition from Lithuanian wheat grain in years 2005‑2007 to 2011‑2013. Proceedings of the Latvia University of Agriculture, 32, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schothorst, R. C., & van Egmond, H. P. (2004). Report from SCOOP task 3.2.10 “collection of occurrence data of Fusarium toxins in food and assessment of dietary intake by the population of EU member states”, Subtask: trichothecenes. Toxicology Letters, 153, 133–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Somma, S., Petruzzella, A., Logrieco, A., Meca, G., Cacciola, O., & Moretti, A. (2014). Phylogenetic analyses of Fusarium graminearum strains from cereals in Italy, and characterization of their molecular and chemical chemotypes. Crop & Pasture Science, 65(1), 52–60.Google Scholar
  12. Suga, H., Gale, L. R., & Kistler, C. (2004). Development of VNTR markers for two Fusarium graminearum clade species. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 468–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang, J. H., Ndoye, M., Zhang, J. B., Li, H. P., & Liao, Y. C. (2011). Population structure and genetic diversity of the Fusarium graminearum species complex. Toxins, 3, 1020–1037.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang, L., van der Lee, T., Yang, X., Yu, D., & Waalwijk, C. (2008). Fusarium populations on Chinese barley show a dramatic gradient in mycotoxin profiles. Phytopathology, 98(6), 719–727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nature Research Centre, Laboratory of Plant PathologyVilniusLithuania
  2. 2.Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and ForestryKėdainiai distrLithuania

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options