European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 129, Issue 4, pp 507–510 | Cite as

Divergent effects of PVY-infected potato plant on aphids

  • Sébastien BoquelEmail author
  • Philippe Giordanengo
  • Arnaud Ameline


Host plant selection by aphids can be positively or negatively affected when plants are infected by phytoviruses. Potato plants infected by Potato virus Y (PVY), a non-persistent virus, are reported to affect settling behaviour and growth parameters of Myzus persicae Sulzer and Macrosiphum euphorbiae Thomas. Using the Electrical penetration graph system (EPG), we demonstrated that PVY-infection of potato plants influences the feeding behaviour of these two aphid species. Myzus persicae exhibited increased phloem sap ingestion and reduced non-probing duration. Macrosiphum euphorbiae showed delayed stylet insertion, reduced activity in the phloem vessels and an enhanced non-probing duration. In addition, we showed that these two species exhibited different transmission rates. The opposite effects of PVY-infected potato plant on these two aphids are discussed in terms of PVY spreading in the field.


Virus infection Potato virus Y Feeding behaviour Macrosiphum euphorbiae Myzus persicae 



This work was supported by the “Comité Nord Plants de Pommes de Terre”. We thank the “Service Régional de la Protection des Végétaux du Nord Pas-de-Calais”, the UMR203 INRA-INSA Villeurbanne for providing aphids, and the “Comité Nord Plants de Pommes de Terre” for providing potato tubers. Andrew Roots is thanked for critical reading of the manuscript especially concerning the English language.


  1. Alvarez, A., Garzo, E., Verbeek, M., Vosman, B., Dicke, M., & Tjallingii, W. F. (2007). Infection of potato plants with Potato leafroll virus changes attraction and feeding behaviour of Myzus persicae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 125, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunissen, L., Cherqui, A., Pelletier, Y., Vincent, C., & Giordanengo, P. (2009). Host-plant mediated interactions between two aphid species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 132, 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castle, S. J., & Berger, P. H. (1993). Rates of growth and increase of Myzus persicae on virus-infected potatoes according to type of virus-vector relationship. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 69, 51–60.Google Scholar
  4. Castle, S. J., Mowry, T. M., & Berger, P. H. (1998). Differential settling by Myzus persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae) on various virus infected host plants. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 91, 661–667.Google Scholar
  5. Eigenbrode, S. D., Ding, H., Shiel, P., & Berger, P. H. (2002). Volatiles from potato plants infected with Potato leafroll virus attract and arrest the virus vector, Myzus persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269, 455–460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Felton, G. W., Korth, K. L., Bi, J. L., Wesley, S. V., Huhman, D. V., Mathews, M. C., et al. (1999). Inverse relationship between systemic resistance of plants to microorganisms and to insect herbivory. Current Biology, 9, 317–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fereres, A., & Moreno, A. (2009). Behavioural aspects influencing plant virus transmission by homopteran insects. Virus Research, 141, 158–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fereres, A., Lister, R. M., Araya, J. E., & Foster, J. E. (1989). Development and reproduction of the English grain aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) on wheat cultivars infected with Barley yellow dwarf virus. Environmental Entomology, 18, 388–393.Google Scholar
  9. Giordanengo, P. (2009). EPG-Calc : A PHP program to evaluate EPG parameters. Retrieved April 14, 2007, from Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Web site :
  10. Glais, L., Tribodet, M., & Kerlan, C. (2005). Specific detection of the PVYN-W variant of Potato virus Y. Journal of Virological Methods, 125, 131–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hatcher, P. E., Moore, J., Taylor, J. E., Tinney, G. W., & Paul, N. D. (2004). Phytohormones and plant-herbivore-pathogen interactions: integrating the molecular with the ecological. Ecology, 85, 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Markkula, M., & Laurema, S. (1964). Changes in the concentration of free amino acids in plants induced by virus diseases and the reproduction of aphids. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae, 3, 265–271.Google Scholar
  13. Pescod, K. V., Quick, W. P., & Douglas, A. E. (2007). Aphid responses to plants with genetically manipulated phloem nutrient levels. Physiological Entomology, 32, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Srinivasan, R., & Alvarez, J. M. (2007). Effect of mixed viral infections (Potato virus YPotato leafroll virus) on biology and preference of vectors Myzus persicae and Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 100, 646–655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tjallingii, W. F. (1978). Electronic recording of penetration behaviour by aphids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 24, 521–530.Google Scholar
  16. Tjallingii, W. F. (1988). Electrical recording of stylet penetration activities. In A. K. Minks & P. Harrewijn (Eds.), Aphids, their biology, natural enemies and control vol. 2B (pp. 95–108). Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© KNPV 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sébastien Boquel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Philippe Giordanengo
    • 1
  • Arnaud Ameline
    • 1
  1. 1.Biologie des Plantes et Contrôle des Insectes Ravageurs (UPRES EA 3900), Laboratoire de Biologie des EntomophagesUniversité de Picardie Jules VerneAmiens CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations