European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 124, Issue 2, pp 331–335 | Cite as

Evaluation of glyphosate-tolerant soybean cultivars for resistance to bacterial pustule

  • Lopa Goradia
  • Glen L. Hartman
  • Steven L. DanielEmail author


Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines causes bacterial pustule of soybean, which is a common disease in many soybean-growing areas of the world and is controlled by a single recessive gene (rxp gene) commonly found in many conventional glyphosate-sensitive soybean cultivars. Since glyphosate-tolerant cultivars are commonly planted today, there has been no information about whether these new cultivars have bacterial pustule resistance. The goal of this study was to screen glyphosate-tolerant soybean cultivars for resistance to X. axonopodis pv. glycines. Three experiments were completed to evaluate resistance. In experiment 1, 525 commercial glyphosate-tolerant cultivars from 2001 were inoculated with X. axonopodis pv. glycines strain UIUC-1. Following inoculation, many of the cultivars were resistant (developed no detectable pustule symptoms) although 152 (~29%) developed bacterial pustule. In experiment 2, the aggressiveness of three strains (UIUC-1, UIUC-2, and ATCC 17915) of X. axonopodis pv. glycines were compared on three bacterial pustule-susceptible, glyphosate-tolerant cultivars. One strain (UIUC-1) was less aggressive than the other two (UIUC-2 and ATCC 17915) on all three cultivars examined. In experiment 3, 45 cultivars from 2005 (all different from 2001) were inoculated with X. axonopodis pv. glycines ATCC 17915. A range of disease severities developed with five cultivars (11%) having disease severity ratings as high as or higher than those on a susceptible check cultivar. Overall, these results suggested that resistance to bacterial pustule occurs in glyphosate-tolerant soybean cultivars, but not at 100% frequency, which means bacterial pustule outbreaks could occur when a susceptible cultivar is planted and conditions are conducive for bacterial pustule development.


Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines Roundup Ready® soybeans Foliar bacterial pathogen 



A portion of this work was done during a sabbatical leave (S. L. Daniel) at the National Soybean Research Centre at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. We express our appreciation to Andrea Pabon, Curt Hill, Ron Warsaw, and Theresa Herman for their help on this project. Funding for this project was provided by the Illinois Soybean Association and the Tiffany Graduate Fund at Eastern Illinois University.


  1. Ansari, M. M. (2005). Variability in Indian isolates of Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycines, the incitant of bacterial pustule of soybean (Glycine max). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 75, 117–119.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, R. L., & Lindahl, D. A. (1972). Registration of Williams soybean. Crop Science, 12, 716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerdeira, A. L., & Duke, S. O. (2006). The current status and environmental impacts of glyphospate-resistant crops: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, 1633–1658. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chamberlain, D. W. (1962). Reaction of resistant and susceptible soybeans to Xanthomonas phaseoli var. sojensis. Plant Disease Reporter, 46, 707–709.Google Scholar
  5. Duke, S. O., & Cerdeira, A. L. (2007). Risks and benefits of glyphosate-resistant crops. ISB News Reports, January, 1–5. Retrieved August 24, 2008 from
  6. Groth, D. E., & Braun, E. J. (1989). Survival, seed transmission, and epiphytic development of Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycines in the north-central United States. Plant Disease, 73, 326–330. doi: 10.1094/PD-73-0326.Google Scholar
  7. Hartman, G. L., & Wang, T. C. (1997). Bacterial pustule development and associated yield loss on nine soybean lines. Proceedings from the World Soybean Research Conference V, 21–27. February, 1994, Chiang Mai, Thailand (pp. 194–196).Google Scholar
  8. Hartwig, E. E., & Lehman, S. G. (1951). Inheritance of resistance to the bacterial pustule disease in soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 43, 226–229.Google Scholar
  9. Kaewnum, S., Prathuangwong, S., & Burr, T. J. (2005). Aggressiveness of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines isolates to soybean and hypersensitivity responses by other plants. Plant Pathology, 54, 409–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01176.x.Google Scholar
  10. Manjaya, J. G., & Pawar, S. E. (1999). New genes for resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycines in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and their inheritance. Euphytica, 106, 205–208. doi: 10.1023/A:1003560402719.Google Scholar
  11. Narvel, J. M., Jakkula, L. R., Phillips, D. V., Wang, T., Lee, S.-H., & Boerma, H. R. (2001). Molecular mapping of Rxp conditioning reaction to bacterial pustule in soybean. The Journal of Heredity, 92, 267–270. doi: 10.1093/jhered/92.3.267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sharma, A., Nair, P. M., & Pawar, S. E. (1993). Identification of soybean strains resistant to Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycines. Euphytica, 67, 95–99. doi: 10.1007/BF00022730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sinclair, J. B. (1999). Bacterial pustule. In G. L. Hartman, J. B. Sinclair, & J. C. Rupe (Eds.), Compendium of Soybean Diseases (pp. 6–7). St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: American Phytopathological Society.Google Scholar
  14. USDA (2007). National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved August 24, 2008 from
  15. Vauterin, L., Hoste, B., Kersters, K., & Swings, J. (1995). Reclassification of Xanthomonas. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 45, 472–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vauterin, L., Rademaker, J., & Swings, J. (2000). Synopsis on the taxonomy of the genus Xanthomonas. Phytopathology, 90, 677–682. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.7.677.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wrather, J. A., & Koenning, S. R. (2006). Estimates of disease effects on soybean yields in the United States 2003–2005. Journal of Nematology, 38, 173–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wrather, J. A., Anderson, T. R., Arsyad, D. M., Tan, Y., Ploper, L. D., Porta-Puglia, A., et al. (2001a). Soybean disease loss estimates for the top ten soybean-producing countries in 1998. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 23, 115–121.Google Scholar
  19. Wrather, J. A., Stienstra, W. C., & Koenning, S. R. (2001b). Soybean disease loss estimates for the United States from 1996 to 1998. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 23, 122–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© KNPV 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lopa Goradia
    • 1
  • Glen L. Hartman
    • 2
  • Steven L. Daniel
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesEastern Illinois UniversityCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.USDA-ARS, Department of Crop Sciences, National Soybean Research CenterUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations