Application of pathogen surveys, disease nurseries and varietal resistance characteristics in an IPM approach for the control of wheat yellow rust

  • Mogens S. Hovmøller
  • Karen E. Henriksen


The present paper presents the rationale for the use of pathogen surveys, inoculated and non-inoculated disease nurseries and varietal resistance characteristics in an integrated approach to control wheat yellow rust in Denmark. The non-inoculated disease observation plots, which gave valuable information about yellow rust at the year, site and variety level, served as the primary sample source for the pathogen survey revealing pathogen virulence dynamics. This survey was also the main source for isolates of new pathotypes, a prerequisite for the assessment of the resistance characteristics of varieties and breeding lines in inoculated nurseries, and the postulation of race-specific resistance genes. A simple grouping of varieties into four categories with respect to resistance to the current yellow rust population proved robust, and this grouping was used as a determinant in a web-based decision support system for pesticide applications in cereals, Crop Protection On-line (CPO). The interplay between the different research and survey activities in the integrated pest management (IPM) approach demonstrated the need for a coherent and long-term involvement at all stages from plant breeding to the official variety approval system, extension service and research in disease epidemiology and resistance genetics.


Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici Integrated pest management Disease resistance Pathotype 



Access to high quality disease assessments from disease observation plots across multiple locations and years by S. Sindberg and colleagues, The Danish Plant Directorate, Tystofte, is greatly acknowledged, as well as valuable comments from L. N. Jørgensen, Flakkebjerg, on the Danish Pesticide Action Plan and the CPO-threshold values.


  1. Anonymous (2007a). The official list of varieties. The Danish Gazette for Plant Varieties, 26, 42. Retrieved October 2, 2007 from
  2. Anonymous (2007b). Vejledning i bedømmelser i Landsforsøgene. Århus: Dansk Landbrugsrådgivning, Landscentret.Google Scholar
  3. Bayles, R. A., Flath, K., Hovmøller, M. S., & Vallavielle-Pope, C. (2000). Break-down of the Yr17 resistance to yellow rust of wheat in northern Europe. Agronomie, 20, 805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayles, R. A., Hubbard, A. J., & Slater, S. E. (2004). Yellow rust of wheat. Annual report 2003, UKPVSC, 11–20.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J. K. M. (2003). Little else but parasites. Science, 299, 1680–1681.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruil, A. A. M., Verhaar, M. A., Vandenbosch, F., Hoogkamer, W., & Zadoks, J. C. (1989). Effect of cultivar mixtures on the wave velocity of expanding yellow stripe rust foci in winter wheat. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 37(1), 75–78.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, X. M. (2005). Epidemiology and control of stripe rust [Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici] on wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 27, 314–337.Google Scholar
  8. Christiansen, M. J., Feenstra, B., Skovgaard, I. M., & Andersen, S. B. (2006). Genetic analysis of resistance to yellow rust in hexaploid wheat using a mixture model for multiple crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 112, 581–591.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Enjalbert, J., Duan, X., Leconte, M., Hovmøller, M. S., & de Vallavieille-Pope, C. (2005). Genetic evidence of local adaptation of wheat yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) within France. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2065–2073.Google Scholar
  10. Eriksson, J., & Henning, E. (1896). Die Getreidenroste. Stockholm: Norstedt & Söner.Google Scholar
  11. Flor, H. (1971). Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 9, 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagelskjær, L., & Jørgensen, L. N. (2003). A web-based decision support system for integrated management of cereal pests. EPPO Bulletin, 33, 467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hermansen, J. E. (1968). Studies on the spread and survival of cereal rust and mildew diseases in Denmark. Dr Science thesis, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural College Copenhagen. Fresia, 8(3), 1–206.Google Scholar
  14. Hovmøller, M. S. (2001). Disease severity and pathotype dynamics of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in Denmark. Plant Pathology, 50, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hovmøller, M. S. (2007). Sources of seedling and adult plant resistance to P. striiformis f. sp. tritici in European wheats. Plant Breeding, 126, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hovmøller, M. S., & Justesen, A. F. (2007). Appearance of atypical Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici phenotypes in north-western Europe. Australian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 58, 518–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, R. (1984). A critical analysis of durable resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 22, 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, R. (1992). Past, present and future opportunities in breeding for disease resistance, with examples from wheat. Euphytica, 63, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, R., Stubbs, R. W., Fuchs, E., & Chamberlain, N. H. (1972). Nomenclature for physiologic races of Puccinia striiformis infecting wheat. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 58, 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jørgensen, L. N. (Ed.) (2006). Pesticidafprøvning 2006. DJF-rapport Markbrug 129, 136 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Jørgensen, L. N., Hagelskjær, L., & Nielsen, G. C. (2003). Adjusting the fungicide input in winter wheat depending on variety resistance. Proceedings of BCPC Conference on Crop Science and Technology (pp. 1115–1120). Glasgow, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Jørgensen, L. N., & Kudsk P. (2006). Twenty years’ experience with reduced agrochemical inputs: Effect on farm economics, water quality, biodiversity and environment. (Paper presented at the HGCA conference, Grantham UK).Google Scholar
  23. Jørgensen, L. N., Noe, E., Langvad, A. M., Jensen, J. E., Ørum, J. E., & Rydahl, P. (2007). Decision support systems: Barriers and farmers’ need for support. EPPO Bulletin, 37, 374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manners, J. G. (1988). Puccinia striiformis, yellow rust (stripe rust) of cereals and grasses. Advanced Plant Pathology, 6, 373–387.Google Scholar
  25. McNeal, F. H., Konzak, C. F., Smith, E. P., Tate, W., & Russel, T. S. (1971). A uniform system for recording and processing cereal research data. US Agricultural Research Service, 42, 34–121.Google Scholar
  26. Pinnschmidt, H., Hovmøller, M. S., & Østergård, H. (2006). Approaches for field assessment of resistance to leaf pathogens in spring barley varieties. Plant Breeding, 125(2), 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Priestley, R. H., Bayles, R. A., & Thomas, J. E. (1984). Identification of specific resistances against Puccinia striiformis (yellow rut) in winter wheat varieties. I. Establishment of a set of type varieties for adult plant tests. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany, 16, 469–476.Google Scholar
  28. Schmidt, K. (2003). Ergebnisse der Meldungen für Pflanzenschutzmittel und Wirkstoffe nach § 19 des Pflanzenschutzgesetzes für die Jahre 1999, 2000 und 2001 in Vergleich zu 1998. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes, 55, 121–133.Google Scholar
  29. Stubbs, R. W. (1985). Stripe rust. In A. P. Roelfs, & W. R. Bushnell (Eds.) The cereal rusts volume 2: Diseases, distribution, epidemiology and control (pp. 61–101). London: Academic .Google Scholar
  30. Wellings, C. R. (2007). Puccinia striiformis in Australia: A review of the incursion, evolution, and adaption of stripe rust in the period 1979–2006. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 58, 567–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zadoks, J. C. (1961). Yellow rust on wheat: Studies in epidemiology and physiologic specialisation. Tijdschrift over Planteziekten, 67, 69–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KNPV 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Integrated Pest ManagementUniversity of AarhusSlagelseDenmark

Personalised recommendations