Control of Leveillula taurica in Tomato by Acremonium alternatum is by Induction of Resistance, not Hyperparasitism
Spores of the hyperparasite Acremonium alternatum reduced powdery mildew infection by Leveillula taurica on greenhouse tomato. The effect was slightly increased when spores were applied killed, and therefore not due to direct parasitism. The effect was systemic, protecting untreated leaves above the treated ones. Spores killed by heat had more effect than when killed by UV, so the effect was presumably due to induction of host resistance by substances released when cells were heat killed. The size of the effect depended upon leaf age and level of infection. Effects on primary infection and expansion of successful infections appear to be under independent control.
Key wordsbiocontrol hyperparasite induced resistance powdery mildew tomato systemic
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Belanger RR, Labbe C (2002) Control of powdery mildews without chemicals: Prophylactic and biological alternatives for horticultural crops. In: Belanger RR, Bushnell WR, Dik AJ, Carver TLW, (eds) The Powdery Mildews. A Comprehensive Treatise. APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota, 256–257Google Scholar
- Cerkauskas RF, Leopold L, Ferguson G (2000) Control of powdery mildew in greenhouse cucumbers, peppers, and tomatoes (Abstract)Phytopathology 90: S12Google Scholar
- Guzman-Plazola RA (1997) Development of a spray forecast model for tomato powdery mildew (Leveillula taurica) (Lev.) Arn. PhD Thesis, University of California, Davis, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Malathrakis NE, (1985) The fungus Acremonium alternatum Linc:Fr., a hyperparasite of the cucubits powdery mildew pathogen Sphaerotheca fuligineaZeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz 92:509–515Google Scholar
- Mead R, Curnow RN, Hasted AM, (2003) Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Ozeretskovskaya (1995) Induced resistance. In: Hammerschmidt R, Kuc J (eds) Induced Resistance to Disease in Plants (pp. 31–62). Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar