European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 114, Issue 3, pp 329–341 | Cite as

Biological Control of Plant Diseases: The European Situation

  • Claude Alabouvette
  • Chantal Olivain
  • Christian Steinberg
Review

Abstract

The most common approach to biological control consists of selecting antagonistic microorganisms, studying their modes of action and developing a biological control product. Despite progress made in the knowledge of the modes of action of these biological control agents (BCAs), practical application often fails to control disease in the fields. One of the reasons explaining this failure is that the bio-control product is used the same way as a chemical product. Being biological these products have to be applied in accordance with their ecological requirements. Another approach consists of induction of plant defence reactions. This can be done by application of natural substances produced by or extracted from microorganisms, plants, or algae. Since they do not aim at killing the pathogens, these methods of disease control are totally different from chemical control. Although promising, these methods have not been sufficiently implemented under field conditions. A third approach consists of choosing cultural practices that might decrease the incidence or severity of diseases. These methods include the choice of an appropriate crop rotation with management of the crop residues, application of organic amendments and the use of new technology such as the biological disinfestation of soils. Biological control practices need an integrative approach, and more knowledge than chemical control.

Keywords

biofumigation compost amendments cultural practices microbial antagonism natural products systemic induced resistance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, PB, Fravel, DR 1993

    Dynamics of Sporidesmium, a naturally occuring fungal mycoparasite

    Lumsden, RDVaughn, JL eds. Pest Management: Biologically based TechnologiesAmerican Chemical SocietyWashington, DC189195
    Google Scholar
  2. Alabouvette, C 1986Fusarium-wilt suppressive soils from the Châteaurenard region: review of a 10-year studyAgronomie6273284Google Scholar
  3. Alabouvette, C, Backhouse, D, Steinberg, C, Donovan, NJ, Edel-Hermann, V, Burgess, LW 2004

    Microbial diversity in soil – effects on crop health

    Schonning, PEmholt, SChristensen, BT eds. Managing Soil Quality. Challenges in Modern AgricultureCABI PublishingWallingford, U.K121138
    Google Scholar
  4. Arnault, IN, Mondy, S, Diwo, , Auger, J 2004Soil behaviour of sulfur natural fumigants used as methyl bromide substitutesInternational Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry847582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, KF, Snyder, WC 1965Ecology of Soil-borne Plant Pathogens, Prelude to Biological ControlUniversity of California PressBerkeley, Los Angeles571Google Scholar
  6. Bakker, PAHM, Peer, R, Schippers, B 1991

    Suppression of soil-borne plant pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads: mechanisms and prospects

    Beemster, ABRBollen, GJGerlach, MRuissen, MASchippers, BTempel, A eds. Development in Agriculturally Managed Forest EcologyElsevierAmsterdam217230
    Google Scholar
  7. Biles, CL, Martyn, RD 1989Local and systemic resistance induced in watermelons by formae speciales of Fusarium oxysporumPhytopathology79856860Google Scholar
  8. Blok, WJ, Lamers, JG, Termorhuizen, AJ, Bollen, AJ 2000Control of soilborne plant pathogens by incorporating fresh organic amendments followed by tarpingPhytopathology30253259Google Scholar
  9. Bollen, GJ 1985a

    The fate of plant pathogens during composting of crop residues

    Gasser, JKR eds. Composting of Agricultural and Other WastesElsevier Applied Science PublishersBarking, UK282290
    Google Scholar
  10. Bollen, GJ 1985b

    Lethal temperatures of soil fungi

    Parker, CARovira, ADMoore, KJWong, PTW eds. Ecology and Management of Soilborne Plant PathogensElsevier Applied Science PublishersBarking, UK191193
    Google Scholar
  11. Bolwerk, A, Lagopodi, AL, Wijfjes, AH, Lamers, GE, Chin-A-Woeng, TFC, Lugtenberg, BJJ, Bloemberg, GV 2003Interactions in the tomato rhizosphere of two Pseudomonas biocontrol strains with the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersiciMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions11983993Google Scholar
  12. Bouhot, D 1997A two-level bioassay for the study of soil sickness. Its application to the study of celeriac root necrosisAnnales de Phytopathologie1195109Google Scholar
  13. Burges, HD 1998Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides: Beneficial Microorganisms, Nematodes and Seed TreatmentsKluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht412Google Scholar
  14. Chet, I, Baker, R 1981Isolation and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma harmatum from soil naturally suppressive to Rhizoctonia solaniPhytopathology71286290Google Scholar
  15. Cook, R, Baker, KF 1983The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant PathogensAmerican Phytopathological SocietySt Paul, Minnesota539Google Scholar
  16. Cotxarrera, L, Trillas-Gay, MI, Steinberg, C, Alabouvette, C 2002Use of sewage sludge compost and Trichoderma asperellum isolates to suppress Fusarium wilt of tomatoSoil Biology and Biochemistry34467476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Couteaudier, Y, Alabouvette, C 1990Quantitative comparison of Fusarium oxysporum competitiveness in relation with carbon utilizationFEMS Microbiology Ecology74261268Google Scholar
  18. Coventry, E, Fayolle, L, Aimé, S, Alabouvette, C, Noble, R, Whipps, J 2004Eradication of plant pathogens and pests from composting wastes and their use in disease suppressionIOBC/wprs Bulletin27265270Google Scholar
  19. Défago, G, Haas, D 1990

    Pseudomonads as antagonists of soilborne plant pathogens: modes of action and genetic analysis

    Bollag, JMStotsky, G eds. Soil BiochemistryMarcel Dekker IncNew York249291
    Google Scholar
  20. DeVay, JE 1995Solarization: an environmental-friendly technology for pest managementArabic Journal Plant Protection135661Google Scholar
  21. DeVay JE, Stapleton JJ and Elmore CL (1991) Soil solarization. In Proceedings, First International Conference on Soil Solarization, Amman, Jordanie. Plant Production and Protection Paper 109, FAO, Rome, ItalieGoogle Scholar
  22. Erhart, E, Burian, K, Hartl, W, Stich, K 1999Suppression of Pythium ultimum by biowaste composts in relation to compost microbial biomass, activity and content of phenolic compoundsJournal of Phytopathology147299305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuchs, JG, Moënne-Loccoz, Y, Défago, G 1997Nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum strain Fo47 induces resistance to fusarium wilt in tomatoPlant Disease81492496Google Scholar
  24. Fokkema, NJ 1996Biological control on aerial plant surfacesFood and Fertilizer Technology Center for the ASPAC Region Book Series424148Google Scholar
  25. Fravel, D 1988Role of antibiosis in the biocontrol of plant diseasesAnnual Review of Phytopathology267591Google Scholar
  26. Guillemaut C (2003) Identification et étude de l’écologie de Rhizoctonia solani, responsable de la maladie de pourriture brune de la betterave sucrière. PhD Thesis Université Claude Bernard Lyon. 90 pGoogle Scholar
  27. Harman, GE, Petzoldt, R, Comis, A, Chen, J 2004aInteractions between Trichoderma harzianum strain T22 and maize inbred line Mo17 and effects of these interactions on diseases caused by Pythium ultimum and Colletotrichum graminicolaPhytopathology94147153Google Scholar
  28. Harman, GE, Howell, CR, Viterbo, A, Chet, I, Lorito, M 2004bTrichoderma species – opportunistic, avirulent plant symbiontsNature Reviews Microbiology24356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoitink, HAJ 1980Composted bark, a lightweight growth medium with fungicidal propertiesPlant Disease66142147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoitink, HAJ, Boehm, MJ 1999Biocontrol within the context of soil microbial communities: a substrate-dependent phenomenonAnnual Review of Phytopathology37427446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hornby, D 1998Take all Disease of Cereals: A Regional PerspectiveCAB InternationalWallingford384Google Scholar
  32. Howell, CR 1998

    The role of antibiosis in biocontrol

    Harman, GEKubieck, CP eds. Trichoderma & Gliocladium. Volume 2, Enzymes, Biological Control and Commercial ApplicationTaylor & Francis LTDLondon173180
    Google Scholar
  33. Jones, EE, Mead, A, Whipps, JM 2004aEffect of inoculum type and timing of application of Coniothyrium minitans on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: control of sclerotinia disease in glasshouse lettucePlant Pathology53611620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, EE, Clarkson, JP, Mead, A, Whipps, JM 2004bEffect of inoculum type and timing of application of Coniothyrium minitans on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: influence on apothecial productionPlant Pathology53621628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Katan, T 1996

    Soil solarization: integrated control aspects

    Hall, R eds. Principle and Practice of Managing Soilborne Plant PathogensThe American Phytopathological SocietySt Paul, Minnesota250278
    Google Scholar
  36. Kirkegaard, JA, Sarwar, M, Matthiessen, JN 1998Assessing the biofumigation potential of crucifersActa Horticulturae459105111Google Scholar
  37. Kloepper, JW, Tuzun, S, Liu, L, Wei, G 1993

    Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as inducers of systemic disease resistance

    Lumsden, RDVaugh, JL eds. Pest Management: Biologically based technologiesAmerican chemical SocietyWashington, USA156165
    Google Scholar
  38. Kroon, BA, Scheffer, RJ, Elgersma, DM 1992Induced resistance in tomato plants against fusarium wilt involved by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. dianthiNetherlands Journal of Plant Pathology97401408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kubicek, CP, Penttilä, ME 1998

    Regulation of production of plant polysaccharide degrading enzymes by Trichoderma

    Harman, GEKubicek, CP eds. Trichoderma & Gliocladium. Volume 2, Enzymes, Biological Control and Commercial ApplicationTaylor & FrancisLondon UK4967
    Google Scholar
  40. Kuc, J 1987

    Plant immunization and its applicability for disease control

    Chet I,  eds. Innovative Approaches to Plant Disease ControlJohn Wiley and SonsNew York255274
    Google Scholar
  41. Lamers, J, Wanten, P, Blok, W 2004Biological soil disinfestation: a safe and effective approach for controlling soilborne pests and diseasesAgroindustria3289291Google Scholar
  42. Larkin, RP, Fravel, DR 1999Mechanisms of action and dose-response relationships governing biological control of Fusarium wilt of tomato by nonpathogenic Fusarium sppPhytopathology8911521161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lawrence, L, Matthiessen, J 2004Biofumigation-using Brassica rotations to manage soil-borne pests and diseasesOutlooks on Pest Management154243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lemanceau, P, Alabouvette, C 1991Biological control of Fusarium diseases by fluorescent Pseudomonas and non-pathogenic FusariumCrop Protection10279286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lemanceau, P, Alabouvette, C 1993Suppression of Fusarium-wilts by fluorescent pseudomonads: mechanisms and applicationsBiocontrol Science and Technology3219234Google Scholar
  46. Lemanceau, P, Bakker, PAHM, Kogel, WJ, Alabouvette, C, Schippers, B 1992Effect of pseudobactin 358 production by Pseudomonads putida WCS358 on suppression of Fusarium wilt of carnations by nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum Fo47Applied Environmental Microbiology5829782982Google Scholar
  47. Lockwood, JL 1977Fungistasis in soilsBiological Review52143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Loper, JE, Lindow, SE 1993

    Roles of competition and antibiosis in suppression of plant diseases by bacterial biological control agents

    Lumsden, DVaugh, JL eds. Pest Management: Biologically Bases TechnologiesAmerican Chemical SocietyWashington DC144155
    Google Scholar
  49. Loper, JE, Henkels, MD 1997Availability of iron to Pseudomonas fluorescens in rhizosphere and bulk soil evaluated with an ice nucleation reporter geneApplied and Environmental Microbiology6399105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lopez-Escudero, FJ, Blanco-Lopez, MA 2001Effect of a single or double soil solarization to control Verticillium wilt in established olive orchards in SpainPlant Disease85489496Google Scholar
  51. Lorito, M 1998

    Chitinolytic enzymes and their genes

    Harman, GEKubicek, CP eds. Trichoderma & Gliocladium. Volume 2, Enzymes, Biological Control and Commercial ApplicationTaylor & FrancisLondon, UK7392
    Google Scholar
  52. Lumsden, RD, Lewis, J.A., Millner, PD 1983Effect of composted sewage sludge on several soilborne pathogens and diseasesPhytopathology7315431548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mandeel, Q, Baker, R 1991Mechanisms involved in biological control of Fusarium wilt of cucumber with strains of nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporumPhytopathology81462469Google Scholar
  54. Milgroom, MG, Cortesi, P 2004Biological control of chestnut blight with hypovirulense: a critical analysisAnnual Review of Phytopathology42331638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nicot PC, Decognet V, Fruit L, Bardin M and Trottin Y (2002) Combined effect of microclimate and dose of application on the efficacy of biocontrol agents for the protection of pruning wounds on tomatoes against Botrytis cinerea. Bulletin IOBC/SROP 25: 73–76Google Scholar
  56. Olivain, C, Steinberg, C, Alabouvette, C 1995

    Evidence of induced resistance in tomato inoculated by nonpathogenic strains of Fusarium oxysporum

    Manka, M eds. Environmental Biotic Factors in Integrated Plant Disease ControlThe Polish Phytopathological SocietyPoznan Pologne427430
    Google Scholar
  57. Olivain, C, Trouvelot, S, Binet, M-N, Cordier, C, Pugin, A, Alabouvette, C 2003Colonization of flax roots and early physiological responses of flax cells inoculated with pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of Fusarium oxysporumApplied and Environmental Microbiology6954535462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olivain, C, Alabouvette, C, Steinberg, C 2004Production of a mixed inoculum of Fusarium oxysporum Fo47 and Pseudomonas fluorescens C7 to control Fusarium diseasesBiocontrol Science and Technology14227238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Olivain C, Humbert C, Nahalkova J, Fatehi J, L’Haridon F and Alabouvette C (2006) Colonization of tomato roots by pathogenic and non-pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum together and separately in the soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology (in press)Google Scholar
  60. Oyarzum, PJ, Gerlagh, M, Zadoks, JC 1998Factors associated with soil receptivity to some fungal root rot pathogens of peasApplied Soil Ecology10151169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pérez-Piqueres A, Edel-Hermann V, Alabouvette C and Steinberg C (2005) Response of soil microbial communities to compost amendments. Soil Biology & Biochemistry (in press)Google Scholar
  62. Roget, DK, Neate, SM, Rovira, AD 1996Effect of sowing point design and tillage practice on the incidence of Rhizoctonia root rot, take-all and cereal cyst nematode in wheat and barleyAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture36683693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schisler, DA, Slininger, PJ, Hanson, LE, Loria, R. 2000Potato cultivar, pathogen isolate and antagonist cultivation medium influence the efficacy and ranking of bacterial antagonists of Fusarium dry rotBiocontrol Science and Technology10267279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Serra-Wittling, C, Houot, S, Alabouvette, C 1996Increased soil suppressiveness to fusarium wilt of flax after addition of municipal solid waste compostSoil Biology & Biochemistry2812071214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schippers, B, Bakker, AW, Bakker, PAHM 1987Interactions of deleterious and beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms and the effect of cropping practicesAnnual Review of Phytopathology25339358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sivasithamparam K and Ghisalberti EL (1998) Secondary metabolism in Trichoderma and Gliocladium. In: Harman GE and Kubicek CP (eds.) Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Volume 1, Basic Biology, Taxonomy and Genetics (pp. 139–192) Taylor and Francis, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  67. Steinberg C, Edel V, Guillemaut C, Perez A, Singh P and Alabouvette C (2004) Impact of organic amendments on soil suppressiveness to diseases. In: Sikora RA, Gowen S, Hauschild R and Kiewnick S (eds.) Multitrophic Interactions in Soil and Integrated Control (pp. 259–266) IOBC wprs BulletinGoogle Scholar
  68. Thomashow, LS, Weller, DM 1988Role of a phenazine antibiotic from Pseudomonas fluorescens in biological control of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. triticiJournal of Bacteriology17034993508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomashow, LS, Weller, DM 1996

    Molecular basis of pathogen suppression by antibiosis in the rhizosphere

    Hall, R eds. Principles and Practice of Managing Soilborne Plant PathogensAmerican Phytopathological SocietySaint-Paul, MN, USA80103
    Google Scholar
  70. Tilston, EL, Pitt, D, Groenhof, AC 2002Composted recycled organic matter suppresses soil-borne diseases of field cropsNew Phytologist154731740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Trottin-Caudal Y, Fournier C, Leyre J M, Decognet V, Romiti C, Nicot P and Bardin M (2003) Efficiency of plant extract from Reynoutria sachalinensis (Milsana) to control powdery mildew on tomato (Oidium neolycopersici). In: Roche L, Edin M, Mathieu V and Laurens F (eds.) Colloque international tomate sous abri, protection intégrée - agriculture biologique (pp. 11–15) CTIFL, Avignon, France, 17–18 et 19 septembre 2003Google Scholar
  72. Loon, JC 2000

    Induced resistance

    Slusarenko, AJFraser, RSSLoon, JC eds. Mechanisms of Resistance to Plant DiseasesKluwer Academic publishersDordrecht, NL521574
    Google Scholar
  73. Loon, JC, Bakker, PAHM, Pieterse, CMJ 1998Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteriaAnnual Review of Phytopathology36453483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weller, DM, Thomashow, LS 1993

    Microbial metabolites with␣biological activity

    Lumsden, DVaugh, JL eds. Pest Management: Biologically Based TechnologiesAmerican Chemical SocietyWashington, USA173180
    Google Scholar
  75. Widmer, TL, Mitkowski, NA, Abawi, GS 2002Soil organic matter and management of plant-parasitic nematodesJournal of Nematology34289295PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claude Alabouvette
    • 1
  • Chantal Olivain
    • 1
  • Christian Steinberg
    • 1
  1. 1.INRA, UMR Microbiologie Géochimie des SolsDijon CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations